Skip to main content

list manipulation - Finding all length-n words on an alphabet that have a specified number of each letter


For example, I might want to generate all length n=6 words on the alphabet {A, B, C} that have one A, three B's and two C's. An example of such a word is: 'ABBBCC'. I'd like to generate all such words.


I've already tried generating all permutations of a particular string (like 'ABBBCC') and deleting all duplicates. This is too slow for my purposes.



Answer



Permutations is already duplicate-aware:


Permutations[{"A", "A", "B"}]


{{"A", "A", "B"}, {"A", "B", "A"}, {"B", "A", "A"}}


Perhaps you are looking for combinations of a particular length (which can then be permuted). One way to get those is this:


f[k_, {}, c__] := If[+c == k, {{c}}, {}]

f[k_, {x_, r___}, c___] := Join @@ (f[k, {r}, c, #] & /@ 0~Range~Min[x, k - +c])

Use:


f[4, {1, 3, 2}]


{{0, 2, 2}, {0, 3, 1}, {1, 1, 2}, {1, 2, 1}, {1, 3, 0}}


These represent the words of length 4 for a list with unique items repeated, 1, 3, and 2 times at most.


You can then construct the actual words from these lists, e.g.:


char = {"A", "B", "C"};

StringJoin@MapThread[ConstantArray, {char, #}] & /@ f[4, {1, 3, 2}]


{"BBCC", "BBBC", "ABCC", "ABBC", "ABBB"}


Or:


Inner[#2 ~Table~ {#} &, f[4, {1, 3, 2}], char, StringJoin]


{"BBCC", "BBBC", "ABCC", "ABBC", "ABBB"}

And with permutations:


Inner[#2 ~Table~ {#} &, f[4, {1, 3, 2}], char, Join]

Permutations /@ %



{{B,B,C,C},{B,B,B,C},{A,B,C,C},{A,B,B,C},{A,B,B,B}}

{{{B,B,C,C},{B,C,B,C},{B,C,C,B},{C,B,B,C},{C,B,C,B},{C,C,B,B}}, . . . }

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...