Skip to main content

computational geometry - Voronoi tessellations on meshed surfaces



Given a meshed surface, on which we can calculate geodesic distances between vertices, how can one calculate the Voronoi tessellation of a set of points located on this surface?


This is somewhat related to the question here, although that question is restricted to a Voronoi tessellation on a unit sphere. See also here for other approaches.



Answer



For this answer, I've slightly streamlined Dunlop's code. As with his routines, the initialization and solving steps are separate; one particular wrinkle in mine is that I wrote special routines for solving the heat equation for the case of multiple points (represented as indices of the associated mesh's vertices), as well as for a single point. The multiple point solver is more efficient than mapping the single point solver across the multiple points.


heatMethodInitialize[mesh_MeshRegion] := 
Module[{acm, ada, adi, adjMat, areas, del, divMat, edges, faces, vertices,
gm1, gm2, gm3, gradOp, nlen, nrms, oped, polys, sa1, sa2, sa3,
tmp, wi1, wi2, wi3},

vertices = MeshCoordinates[mesh];

faces = First /@ MeshCells[mesh, 2];
polys = Map[vertices[[#]] &, faces];

edges = First /@ MeshCells[mesh, 1];
adjMat = AdjacencyMatrix[UndirectedEdge @@@ edges];

tmp = Transpose[polys, {1, 3, 2}];
nrms = MapThread[Dot, {ListConvolve[{{-1, 1}}, #, {{2, -1}}] & /@ tmp,
ListConvolve[{{1, 1}}, #, {{-2, 2}}] & /@ tmp}, 2];
nlen = Norm /@ nrms; nrms /= nlen;


oped = ListCorrelate[{{1}, {-1}}, #, {{3, 1}}] & /@ polys;

wi1 = MapThread[Cross, {nrms, oped[[All, 1]]}];
wi2 = MapThread[Cross, {nrms, oped[[All, 2]]}];
wi3 = MapThread[Cross, {nrms, oped[[All, 3]]}];

sa1 = SparseArray[Flatten[MapThread[Rule,
{MapIndexed[Transpose[PadLeft[{#}, {2, 3}, #2]] &, faces],
Transpose[{wi1[[All, 1]], wi2[[All, 1]], wi3[[All, 1]]}]},

2]]];
sa2 = SparseArray[Flatten[MapThread[Rule,
{MapIndexed[Transpose[PadLeft[{#}, {2, 3}, #2]] &, faces],
Transpose[{wi1[[All, 2]], wi2[[All, 2]], wi3[[All, 2]]}]},
2]]];
sa3 = SparseArray[Flatten[MapThread[Rule,
{MapIndexed[Transpose[PadLeft[{#}, {2, 3}, #2]] &, faces],
Transpose[{wi1[[All, 3]], wi2[[All, 3]], wi3[[All, 3]]}]},
2]]];
adi = SparseArray[Band[{1, 1}] -> 1/nlen];

gm1 = adi.sa1; gm2 = adi.sa2; gm3 = adi.sa3;

gradOp = Transpose[SparseArray[{gm1, gm2, gm3}], {2, 1, 3}];

areas = PropertyValue[{mesh, 2}, MeshCellMeasure];
ada = SparseArray[Band[{1, 1}] -> 2 areas];
divMat = Transpose[#].ada & /@ {gm1, gm2, gm3};
del = divMat[[1]].gm1 + divMat[[2]].gm2 + divMat[[3]].gm3;

With[{spopt = SystemOptions["SparseArrayOptions"]},

Internal`WithLocalSettings[
SetSystemOptions["SparseArrayOptions" -> {"TreatRepeatedEntries" -> 1}],

nlen /= 2;
acm = SparseArray[MapThread[{#1, #1} -> #2 &,
{Flatten[Transpose[faces]],
Flatten[ConstantArray[nlen, 3]]}]],
SetSystemOptions[spopt]]];

{acm, del, gradOp, divMat, adjMat}]


heatSolve[mesh_MeshRegion, acm_, del_,
gradOp_, divMat_][idx_Integer, t : (_?NumericQ | Automatic) : Automatic] :=
Module[{h, tm, u},
tm = If[t === Automatic,
Max[PropertyValue[{mesh, 1}, MeshCellMeasure]]^2, t];
u = LinearSolve[acm + tm del, UnitVector[MeshCellCount[mesh, 0], idx]];
h = Transpose[-Normalize /@ Normal[gradOp.u]];
LinearSolve[del, Total[MapThread[Dot, {divMat, h}]]]]


heatSolve[mesh_MeshRegion, acm_, del_,
gradOp_, divMat_][idx_ /; VectorQ[idx, IntegerQ],
t : (_?NumericQ | Automatic) : Automatic] :=
Module[{h, tm, u},
tm = If[t === Automatic,
Max[PropertyValue[{mesh, 1}, MeshCellMeasure]]^2, t];
u = Transpose[LinearSolve[acm + tm del, Normal[SparseArray[
MapIndexed[Prepend[#2, #1] &, idx] -> 1,
{MeshCellCount[mesh, 0], Length[idx]}]]]];
h = Transpose[-Normalize /@ Normal[gradOp.#]] & /@ u;

h = Transpose[Total[MapThread[Dot, {divMat, #}]] & /@ h];
LinearSolve[del, h]]

With these routines, here's how to generate a(n approximate) Voronoi diagram on the Stanford bunny:


bunny = ExampleData[{"Geometry3D", "StanfordBunny"}, "MeshRegion"];
vertices = MeshCoordinates[bunny]; faces = First /@ MeshCells[bunny, 2];

npoints = 9;
randvertlist = BlockRandom[SeedRandom[42, Method -> "Legacy"]; (* for reproducibility *)
RandomSample[Range[MeshCellCount[bunny, 0]], npoints]];



{am, Δ, gr, dv} = Most @ heatMethodInitialize[bunny];
Φ = heatSolve[bunny, am, Δ, gr, dv][randvertlist, 0.5];

cols = Table[ColorData[61] @ Ordering[v, 1][[1]], {v, Φ}];

Graphics3D[{{Green, Sphere[vertices[[randvertlist]], 0.003]},
GraphicsComplex[vertices, {EdgeForm[], Polygon[faces]},
VertexColors -> cols]},

Boxed -> False, Lighting -> "Neutral"]

Voronoi bunny


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...