Skip to main content

bugs - Notebook's TaggingRules inherit too much


Bug introduced in V10.4 or earlier and persisting through V12.0



[CASE:3852725] was created


[...] I have forwarded an incident report to our developers with the information you provided. [...]






This small helper function will show us TaggingRules written explicitly to the notebook. (Because Options/CurrentValue show values merged from $FrontEnd/$FrontEndSession too)


nbTR[] :=  TaggingRules /. List @@ Rest @ NotebookGet @ EvaluationNotebook[]

Here is the story:




  • create a new notebook and evaluate:


    CurrentValue[$FrontEndSession, {TaggingRules, "a"}] = 1;



  • now we can check that notebook's TaggingRules are nicely merged even though they are not written explicitly:


    CurrentValue[EvaluationNotebook[], {TaggingRules, "a"}]
    nbTR[]


    1


    TaggingRules






  • Pay attention now! Let's use example from documentation: TaggingRules / Applications


    So we want to have some tagging rules local to the notebook:


    CurrentValue[
    EvaluationNotebook[], {TaggingRules, "InputFieldState"}
    ] = "initial string";


  • And let's check:



     CurrentValue[EvaluationNotebook[], {TaggingRules, "InputFieldState"}]


    "initial string"



    but


    nbTR[]


    {......., "a" -> 1 (??!!), "InputFieldState" -> "initial string"}






So the bottom line is, if the notebook doesn't contain TaggingRules explicitly then it will inherit all you have in $FrontEnd/$FrontEndSession!


And this is a problem because:




  • I didn't modify "a"'s value on a notebook level but it is now localized here and won't inherit external changes:


    CurrentValue[$FrontEndSession, {TaggingRules, "a"}] = 22;
    CurrentValue[$
    FrontEndSession, {TaggingRules, "a"}]

    CurrentValue[EvaluationNotebook[], {TaggingRules, "a"}]


    22


    1 (!!!)





  • Not to mention that you write to file possibly private data without notice.





I consider this a serious flaw. Any suggested prevention measures?



Answer



The only solution I've found is to set empty Tagging rules first:


CurrentValue[EvaluationNotebook[], TaggingRules] = {};

CurrentValue[ EvaluationNotebook[], {TaggingRules, "InputFieldState"}] = "initial string";

Which is fine enough for my purposes but this is ok only if the notebook was just created or you know that there aren't any TaggingRules.





The problem of course appears when you don't know and you don't want to overwrite them with {}. Options / CurrentValue (Absolute or not) will only tell you what is there with already included $FrontEnd values, so to check what is explicitly written you have to call NotebookGet, and it doesn't scale well as notebook size grows.


So to check you can run:


MemberQ[TaggingRules -> _] @ Rest @ NotebookGet[]



p.s. there is an undocumented syntax for CurrentValue so that by using:


CurrentValue[$FrontEndSession, {TaggingRules, "test"}, 2]

we say "give me TaggingRules 'test' value and if it doesn't exist, set it to 2 and return 2. Very convenient. But


CurrentValue[EvaluationNotebook[], TaggingRules, {}]


doesn't work in this case :)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...