Skip to main content

bugs - Numerical Functions Compatible with Regions Fail with MeshRegions and BoundaryMeshRegions


Bug introduced in 10.0.0 and fixed in 10.0.2




Given a MeshRegion:



region = DelaunayMesh[RandomReal[1, {50, 3}]]

Mathematica graphics


We can numerically Integrate over it easily:


NIntegrate[x^2 y^2 z^2, {x, y, z} ∈ region]


0.0169908561



We can also Integrate over its boundary:



NIntegrate[x^2 y^2 z^2, {x, y, z} ∈ RegionBoundary@region]


0.151404597



if you replace DelaunayMesh with ConvexHullMesh, which yields a BoundaryMeshRegion, the same process works fine. This does not come as a surprise as the documentation for NIntegrate suggests that integrating over regions in this way is possible.


Now we turn our attention to NArgMin. We can mimic the built-in RegionNearest as follows:


dist[x_?VectorQ, y_?VectorQ] /; Length[x] == Length[y] := Sqrt @ Total[(x - y)^2]   

regN[region_, point_] := NArgMin[{dist[point, x], x ∈ region}, x]


We can use it as follows:


regN[Disk[], {2, 3}]


{0.55470039, 0.832050166}



regN[Sphere[], {2, 3, 4}]



{0.371392166, 0.557086686, 0.742780105}



Note that Disk[] and Sphere[] are Regions. Let's try our MeshRegion from above:


regN[region, {2, 3, 4}]

Mathematica graphics


So, it looks like while NIntegrate works fine with MeshRegion and BoundaryMeshRegion objects, other functions (NArgMin, NArgMax, NMinValue, NMaxValue, NMinimize, NMaximize etc.) that claim to work over regions fail for both. Is this an omission in documentation or implementation, or am I totally missing something here?



Answer



This has been confirmed by Wolfram Technology Group as a bug.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...