plotting - How to make frame ticks' labels have same number of digits after decimal point?

I'm making the ticks labels of my plot using the rule:

FrameTicks -> {{N@FindDivisions[{Min@data1, Max@data2}, 6], None},
    {Range[1960, 2015, 10], None}}

This is generating the ticks I want on both axes pretty well. The only problem is that the y-axis ticks vary in the number of decimal places, which I do not want. Is there a way to make all those numbers have the same number of decimal places as the one with the most decimal places?

I wanted to use something like NumberForm[ticks, {∞, n}] with ticks being the N@..., 6] above, but I'm not sure what n should be to just go with the tick mark with the most decimal places.

Thank you!

Answer

First, generate the ticks and their labels with whatever range is desired.

ticks[min_, max_] := Module[{d = FindDivisions[{min, max}, 6], n}, 
    n = Ceiling@Log10@Max@Denominator@d; {#, NumberForm[#, {∞, n}]} & /@ N@d]

For instance,

t = ticks[.01,.03]
(* {{0.01, NumberForm[0.01, {∞, 3}]}, {0.015, NumberForm[0.015, {∞, 3}]}, 

    {0.02, NumberForm[0.02, {∞, 3}]}, {0.025, NumberForm[0.025, {∞, 3}]}, 
    {0.03, NumberForm[0.03, {∞, 3}]}} *)

(The Output actually looks like .)

They can then be used as, for instance,

Plot[x, {x, 0, .04}, Ticks -> {Automatic, t}, AspectRatio -> 1]

Comments

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...

Blog

Search This Blog