Skip to main content

bugs - How can I change the thickness of tick marks in BarLegend?


Bug introduced in 10.1 or earlier and persisting through 11.0.1 or later




This answer explains how to change various undocumented options for BarLegend with Method. In particular, I want to change the style of the ticks (marks and labels) in BarLegend. For example,


BarLegend[{"SunsetColors", {0, 1}}, LabelStyle -> {FontSize -> 12},

Method -> {Frame -> False, TicksStyle -> Directive[Red, AbsoluteThickness[2]]}]

However, in Mathematica 10.2 on Linux, BarLegend refuses to change the thickness of the tick marks. Also, if I do not add the LabelStyle option then the labels don't change color? In Plot this command works,


Plot[Sin[x], {x, 0, 2 Pi},TicksStyle -> Directive[Red, AbsoluteThickness[2]]]

so I would expect that it works for BarLegend as well.


What is going on and is there a workaround to change the thickness of the tick marks? Thanks.



Answer



Somehow the AbsolutThickness you specified gets replaced by a default value of AbsoluteThickness[0.2].


This misbehavior can be corrected by replacing the incorrect value with your specification.



PlotLegends; (*preload definitions*)

Cell[BoxData[
MakeBoxes@
BarLegend[{"SunsetColors", {0, 1}}, LabelStyle -> {FontSize -> 12},
Method -> {Frame -> False, TicksStyle -> Directive[Red, AbsoluteThickness[2]]}] /.
Directive[RGBColor[1, 0, 0], AbsoluteThickness[_]] ->
Directive[RGBColor[1, 0, 0], AbsoluteThickness[2]] // #[[1, 1]] &
], "Output"] // CellPrint


AbsoluteThickness[2]


For opaque ticks:


Cell[BoxData[
MakeBoxes@
BarLegend[{"SunsetColors", {0, 1}}, LabelStyle -> {FontSize -> 12},
Method -> {Frame -> False, TicksStyle -> Directive[Red, AbsoluteThickness[2]]}] /.
Directive[RGBColor[1, 0, 0], AbsoluteThickness[_]] ->
Directive[RGBColor[1, 0, 0], AbsoluteThickness[2], Opacity[1]] // #[[1, 1]] &
], "Output"] // CellPrint


opaque




Correcting the BarLegend of a DensityPlot, using the syntax provided in the answer by Praan :


DensityPlot[Sin[x y], {x, 0, 1}, {y, 0, 1}, 
PlotLegends ->
BarLegend[Automatic, LabelStyle -> {FontSize -> 12},
Method -> {Frame -> False, TicksStyle -> Directive[Red, AbsoluteThickness[2]]}]] /.
Placed[barLegend_BarLegend, args__] :>
Placed[ToExpression[
FrameBox @@ MakeBoxes[barLegend] /.

Directive[Red, AbsoluteThickness[_]] ->
Directive[Red, AbsoluteThickness[2], Opacity[1]]], args]

DensityPlot


The same output can be achieved by using the following LegendFunction


DensityPlot[Sin[x y], {x, 0, 1}, {y, 0, 1}, 
PlotLegends ->
BarLegend[Automatic, LabelStyle -> {FontSize -> 12},
Method -> {Frame -> False,
TicksStyle -> Directive[Red, AbsoluteThickness[2]]},

LegendFunction -> (# /.
Directive[Red, AbsoluteThickness[_]] ->
Directive[Red, AbsoluteThickness[2], Opacity[1]] &)]]



With the answer by Praan and our discussion in the comments it became clear, that a wrong InterpretationFunction inside the TemplateBox created by BarLegend can cause additional problems.
Compare


MakeBoxes[
BarLegend[{"SunsetColors", {0, 1}}, LegendMarkerSize -> 300,
LabelStyle -> {FontSize -> 12},

Method -> {FrameStyle -> Black, AxesStyle -> None,
TicksStyle -> Black}]] /.
AbsoluteThickness[_] ->
AbsoluteThickness[2] /. (InterpretationFunction :>
f_) -> (InterpretationFunction :> (# &)) // ToExpression

corr


with


MakeBoxes[
BarLegend[{"SunsetColors", {0, 1}}, LegendMarkerSize -> 300,

LabelStyle -> {FontSize -> 12},
Method -> {FrameStyle -> Black, AxesStyle -> None,
TicksStyle -> Black}]] /.
AbsoluteThickness[_] -> AbsoluteThickness[2] // ToExpression

false


or just the InterpretationFunction


MakeBoxes[
BarLegend[{"SunsetColors", {0, 1}}, LegendMarkerSize -> 300,
LabelStyle -> {FontSize -> 12},

Method -> {FrameStyle -> Black, AxesStyle -> None,
TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, AbsoluteThickness[2]]}]] /.
AbsoluteThickness[_] ->
AbsoluteThickness[2] // #[[-1, 2, 1]] & // ToExpression

and the first code block in the answer by Praan.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...