Skip to main content

interpolation - How does ListInterpolation work?


ListInterpolation takes an array of data and interpolates between the entries. Let us interpolate between the elements of the identity matrix. For reference, this is what the identity matrix looks like:


MatrixPlot[IdentityMatrix[5]]

plot of identity matrix


Now let's interpolate, and request first order interpolation:



if = ListInterpolation[IdentityMatrix[5], {{0, 1}, {0, 1}}, InterpolationOrder -> 1];
Plot[if[x, x], {x, 0, 1}]

plot of interpolating function


The result is a piecewise function as expected, but not a piecewise linear function! Why? What does first order interpolation mean here?



The kind of linear interpolation I am familiar with is what ListDensityPlot does:


ListDensityPlot[IdentityMatrix[5], DataRange -> {{0, 1}, {0, 1}}, Mesh -> All]

ListDensityPlot result



Construct a Delaunay triangulation of the data and interpolate on each triangle.


This is not what ListInterpolation does (or even Interpolation when the data is strictly on a square grid). What does ListInterpolation do, then?



Inspired by this question:




Answer



I'll just treat the simplest case of interpolating across four noncoplanar points. The extension to general grids is straightforward (one just joins multiple pieces appropriately).


Consider the following bivariate interpolating polynomial:


ip[x_, y_] = InterpolatingPolynomial[{{{0, 0}, 1}, {{0, 1}, -1/2},
                                      {{2, 0}, 1/2}, {{2, 1}, 0}}, {x, y}];


and the following InterpolatingFunction[]:


if = ListInterpolation[{{1, -1/2}, {1/2, 0}}, {{0, 2}, {0, 1}}, InterpolationOrder -> 1];

They are the same:


Plot3D[ip[x, y] - if[x, y] // Chop, {x, 0, 2}, {y, 0, 1}]

flat as a pancake


Let's have a look at what ip[] looks like:


Expand[ip[x, y]]

   1 - x/4 - (3 y)/2 + (x y)/2

Huh. That last term certainly isn't linear. What gives?


In a bilinear interpolation such as this one, although the procedure is something along the lines of "linearly interpolate for each grid line in one direction, and then linearly interpolate those results", the result is inevitably quadratic. This should come as no surprise to people familiar with the hyperbolic paraboloid, which is one of the simplest examples of a ruled surface, or a surface formed by sweeping out a line in space. In fact, z == 1 - x/4 - (3 y)/2 + (x y)/2 is indeed a hyperbolic paraboloid.


{Plot3D[ip[x, y], {x, 0, 2}, {y, 0, 1}, MeshFunctions -> {#1 - #2 &}], 
 Plot[ip[x, x], {x, 0, 1}]} // GraphicsRow

hyperbolic paraboloid and a cross section


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more