Skip to main content

graphics - Bresenham's line algorithm


Bresenham's line algorithm is producing discretized line for given two points for purpose of plotting for example.



Like that:


enter image description here


I have to stress that I'm interested in positions, not a plot.


Wikipedia link I've provided includes an algorithm of course. I've just rewritten it thoughtlessly, I don't have time now or special need to work on neat implementation.


But if someone want to improve it (compile e.g.), got it already or know something more, I think this thread may be usefull for future visitors.


Very nice implementation can be found on rossetacode :P, according to that this algorithm should be built in so maybe someone knows how to get it.


Anyway, here's that code:


bresenham[{x1_, y1_}, {x2_, y2_}] := 
Module[{dx, xi, dy, yi, ai, bi, x, y, d},
If[x1 < x2, {xi, dx} = {1, x2 - x1};, {xi, dx} = {-1, x1 - x2};];

If[y1 < y2, {yi, dy} = {1, y2 - y1};, {yi, dy} = {-1, y1 - y2};];
x = x1; y = y1;
Sow[{x, y}];
If[dx > dy,
(ai = 2 (dy - dx); bi = 2 dy; d = bi - dx;
While[
If[d >= 0,
{x, y, d} += {xi, yi, ai},
{x, d} += {xi, bi}];
Sow[{x, y}];

x != x2])
,
(ai = 2 (dx - dy); bi = 2 dx; d = bi - dy;
While[
If[d >= 0,
{x, y, d} += {xi, yi, ai},
{y, d} += {yi, bi}];
Sow[{x, y}];
y != y2])
]] // Reap // Last // First


Answer



Original Bresenham


I guess I can come of with a somewhat shorter implementation without using Reap and Sow. If someone is interested, it follows almost exactly the pseudo-code here


bresenham[p0_, p1_] := Module[{dx, dy, sx, sy, err, newp},
{dx, dy} = Abs[p1 - p0];
{sx, sy} = Sign[p1 - p0];
err = dx - dy;
newp[{x_, y_}] :=
With[{e2 = 2 err}, {If[e2 > -dy, err -= dy; x + sx, x],
If[e2 < dx, err += dx; y + sy, y]}];

NestWhileList[newp, p0, # =!= p1 &, 1]
]

To test this I use the setup given by the comment of Kuba under this answer:


p1 = {17, 1}; p2 = {7, 25}; 
Graphics[{EdgeForm[{Thick, RGBColor[203/255, 5/17, 22/255]}],
FaceForm[RGBColor[131/255, 148/255, 10/17]],
Rectangle /@ (bresenham[p1, p2] - .5), {RGBColor[0, 43/255, 18/85],
Thick, Line[{p1, p2}]}},
GridLines -> {Range[150], Range[150]} - .5]


Mathematica graphics


Exercise implementation


What follows was only a fun project I did with my wife. Actually, this is not the original Bresenham algorithm. The task for this weekend-fun was to re-invent the algorithm (the iterative steps and the required correction steps) on the blackboard.


For simplicity this algorithm only makes correction steps in one direction (meaning the points stay always on one half-plane of the line) and therefore, the final points are not as close to the original line as with the real Bresenham algorithm.


Anyway, this is my Mathematica implementation of what my wife had to do in Python:


bresenham[p1 : {x1_, y1_}, p2 : {x2_, y2_}] := 
Module[{dx, dy, dir, corr, test, side},
{dx, dy} = p2 - p1;
dir = If[Abs[dx] > Abs[dy], {Sign[dx], 0}, {0, Sign[dy]}];

test[{x_, y_}] := dy*x - dx*y + dx*y1 - dy*x1;
side = Sign[test[p1 + dir]];
corr = side*{-1, 1}*Reverse[dir];
NestWhileList[
Block[{new = # + dir}, If[Sign[test[new]] == side, new += corr];
new] &, p1, #1 =!= p2 &, 1, 500]]

Here a small dynamic test whether the calculated points do indeed look like a line:


DynamicModule[{p = {{0, 0}, {50, 40}}},
LocatorPane[Dynamic[p],

Dynamic@
Graphics[{Line[bresenham @@ Round[p]], Red, PointSize[Large],
Dynamic[Point[p]]}, PlotRange -> {{-200, 200}, {-200, 200}},
ImageSize -> 400, Frame -> True, FrameTicks -> False,
GridLines -> True],
Appearance -> None
]
]



Mathematica graphics



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.