Skip to main content

notebooks - Can I enter the traditional form for Binomial as input in an expression?


Is there a way to enter the traditional form of a binomial coefficient, i.e. ${n \choose k}$ instead of Binomial[n,k], like I would enter a radical sign $\sqrt{x}$ using Ctrl-Shift-2? I would like to enter it that way in a notebook, and see it in that form in the input as well as output equations, just like the radical. I know that I can use TraditionalForm to convert it on output, but I don't need to do that to see radicals instead of Sqrt.



Answer



You could do it using the following (this is the first version of the answer; don't use it if you want the more complete solution below):


SetOptions[EvaluationNotebook[],InputAliases->{"bn"->
 FormBox[TemplateBox[{"\[SelectionPlaceholder]",
  "\[Placeholder]"},"Binomial"],InputForm]}]

Then enter escbnesc to get a placeholder that you can tab through:


pic



Then enter the numbers and press shift-enter to evaluate.


Edit


To make the output appear formatted without invoking TraditionalForm, you'd have to define a wrapper function and its style. I'll set the keyboard shortcut in a way that doesn't erase previous definitions.


ClearAll[myBinomial]

appearance[x_, y_] := TemplateBox[{x, y}, "myBinomial",
  DisplayFunction :> (RowBox[{"(", "\[NoBreak]", 
       GridBox[{{#1}, {#2}}, RowSpacings -> 1, ColumnSpacings -> 1, 
        RowAlignments -> Baseline, ColumnAlignments -> Center], 
       "\[NoBreak]", ")"}] &), 

  InterpretationFunction :> (RowBox[{"myBinomial", "[", 
       RowBox[{#1, ",", #2}], "]"}] &)
  ]

myBinomial[n_?NumericQ, k_?NumericQ] := Binomial[n, k]

myBinomial /: MakeBoxes[myBinomial[n_, k_], StandardForm] := 
 appearance[ToBoxes[n], ToBoxes[k]]

SetOptions[EvaluationNotebook[], 

 InputAliases -> 
  DeleteDuplicates@
   Join[{"bn" -> 
      appearance["\[SelectionPlaceholder]", "\[Placeholder]"]}, 
    InputAliases /. 
      Quiet[Options[EvaluationNotebook[], InputAliases]] /. 
     InputAliases -> {}]
 ]

Now the template appears as before, but when the function arguments aren't numerical, it's also displayed in 2D form. One could add additional definitions to myBinomial depending on what cases you want the 2D display to apply to. Whenever there is no definition for myBinomial, it is left unevaluated and will be displayed in the formatted style.



Update in response to comment:


Similar templates can also be created for other two-dimensional symbols using other types of brackets. As an example, here are shortcuts for StirlingS1 and StirlingS2 that can be entered as escs1esc and escs2esc:


appearanceS1[x_, y_] := 
 TemplateBox[{x, y}, "myStirlingS1", 
  DisplayFunction :> (StyleBox[
      RowBox[{"[", "\[NoBreak]", 
        GridBox[{{#1}, {#2}}, RowSpacings -> 1, ColumnSpacings -> 1, 
         RowAlignments -> Baseline, ColumnAlignments -> Center], 
        "\[NoBreak]", "]"}], SpanMaxSize -> Infinity] &), 
  InterpretationFunction :> (RowBox[{"myStirlingS1", "[", 

       RowBox[{#1, ",", #2}], "]"}] &)]

myStirlingS1[n_?NumericQ, k_?NumericQ] := StirlingS1[n, k]

myStirlingS1 /: MakeBoxes[myStirlingS1[n_, k_], StandardForm] := 
 appearanceS1[ToBoxes[n], ToBoxes[k]]

appearanceS2[x_, y_] := 
 TemplateBox[{x, y}, "myStirlingS2", 
  DisplayFunction :> (StyleBox[

      RowBox[{"{", "\[NoBreak]", 
        GridBox[{{#1}, {#2}}, RowSpacings -> 1, ColumnSpacings -> 1, 
         RowAlignments -> Baseline, ColumnAlignments -> Center], 
        "\[NoBreak]", "}"}], SpanMaxSize -> Infinity] &), 
  InterpretationFunction :> (RowBox[{"myStirlingS2", "[", 
       RowBox[{#1, ",", #2}], "]"}] &)]

myStirlingS2[n_?NumericQ, k_?NumericQ] := StirlingS2[n, k]

myStirlingS2 /: MakeBoxes[myStirlingS2[n_, k_], StandardForm] := 

 appearanceS2[ToBoxes[n], ToBoxes[k]]

SetOptions[EvaluationNotebook[], 
 InputAliases -> 
  DeleteDuplicates@
   Join[{"s1" -> 
      appearanceS1["\[SelectionPlaceholder]", "\[Placeholder]"], 
     "s2" -> appearanceS2["\[SelectionPlaceholder]", 
       "\[Placeholder]"]}, 
    InputAliases /. 

      Quiet[Options[EvaluationNotebook[], InputAliases]] /. 
     InputAliases -> {}]
 ]

In these definitions, I added one additional ingredient: the square and curly brackets for these symbols are not automatically extensible, so they don't grow like the round brackets used in Binomial. To fix this, I added a StyleBox with option SpanMaxSize -> Infinity.


Also, the shortcuts are be appended to the InputAliases without erasing previous definitions. To make the shortcuts work, this step has to be done after defining the wrapper functions appearance and appearanceS1/S2.


With this, you can get output like this:


s1


for StirlingS1 and


s2



for StirlingS2.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....
Post a Comment
Read more