Skip to main content

notebooks - Can I enter the traditional form for Binomial as input in an expression?


Is there a way to enter the traditional form of a binomial coefficient, i.e. ${n \choose k}$ instead of Binomial[n,k], like I would enter a radical sign $\sqrt{x}$ using Ctrl-Shift-2? I would like to enter it that way in a notebook, and see it in that form in the input as well as output equations, just like the radical. I know that I can use TraditionalForm to convert it on output, but I don't need to do that to see radicals instead of Sqrt.



Answer



You could do it using the following (this is the first version of the answer; don't use it if you want the more complete solution below):


SetOptions[EvaluationNotebook[],InputAliases->{"bn"->
 FormBox[TemplateBox[{"\[SelectionPlaceholder]",
  "\[Placeholder]"},"Binomial"],InputForm]}]

Then enter escbnesc to get a placeholder that you can tab through:


pic



Then enter the numbers and press shift-enter to evaluate.


Edit


To make the output appear formatted without invoking TraditionalForm, you'd have to define a wrapper function and its style. I'll set the keyboard shortcut in a way that doesn't erase previous definitions.


ClearAll[myBinomial]

appearance[x_, y_] := TemplateBox[{x, y}, "myBinomial",
  DisplayFunction :> (RowBox[{"(", "\[NoBreak]", 
       GridBox[{{#1}, {#2}}, RowSpacings -> 1, ColumnSpacings -> 1, 
        RowAlignments -> Baseline, ColumnAlignments -> Center], 
       "\[NoBreak]", ")"}] &), 

  InterpretationFunction :> (RowBox[{"myBinomial", "[", 
       RowBox[{#1, ",", #2}], "]"}] &)
  ]

myBinomial[n_?NumericQ, k_?NumericQ] := Binomial[n, k]

myBinomial /: MakeBoxes[myBinomial[n_, k_], StandardForm] := 
 appearance[ToBoxes[n], ToBoxes[k]]

SetOptions[EvaluationNotebook[], 

 InputAliases -> 
  DeleteDuplicates@
   Join[{"bn" -> 
      appearance["\[SelectionPlaceholder]", "\[Placeholder]"]}, 
    InputAliases /. 
      Quiet[Options[EvaluationNotebook[], InputAliases]] /. 
     InputAliases -> {}]
 ]

Now the template appears as before, but when the function arguments aren't numerical, it's also displayed in 2D form. One could add additional definitions to myBinomial depending on what cases you want the 2D display to apply to. Whenever there is no definition for myBinomial, it is left unevaluated and will be displayed in the formatted style.



Update in response to comment:


Similar templates can also be created for other two-dimensional symbols using other types of brackets. As an example, here are shortcuts for StirlingS1 and StirlingS2 that can be entered as escs1esc and escs2esc:


appearanceS1[x_, y_] := 
 TemplateBox[{x, y}, "myStirlingS1", 
  DisplayFunction :> (StyleBox[
      RowBox[{"[", "\[NoBreak]", 
        GridBox[{{#1}, {#2}}, RowSpacings -> 1, ColumnSpacings -> 1, 
         RowAlignments -> Baseline, ColumnAlignments -> Center], 
        "\[NoBreak]", "]"}], SpanMaxSize -> Infinity] &), 
  InterpretationFunction :> (RowBox[{"myStirlingS1", "[", 

       RowBox[{#1, ",", #2}], "]"}] &)]

myStirlingS1[n_?NumericQ, k_?NumericQ] := StirlingS1[n, k]

myStirlingS1 /: MakeBoxes[myStirlingS1[n_, k_], StandardForm] := 
 appearanceS1[ToBoxes[n], ToBoxes[k]]

appearanceS2[x_, y_] := 
 TemplateBox[{x, y}, "myStirlingS2", 
  DisplayFunction :> (StyleBox[

      RowBox[{"{", "\[NoBreak]", 
        GridBox[{{#1}, {#2}}, RowSpacings -> 1, ColumnSpacings -> 1, 
         RowAlignments -> Baseline, ColumnAlignments -> Center], 
        "\[NoBreak]", "}"}], SpanMaxSize -> Infinity] &), 
  InterpretationFunction :> (RowBox[{"myStirlingS2", "[", 
       RowBox[{#1, ",", #2}], "]"}] &)]

myStirlingS2[n_?NumericQ, k_?NumericQ] := StirlingS2[n, k]

myStirlingS2 /: MakeBoxes[myStirlingS2[n_, k_], StandardForm] := 

 appearanceS2[ToBoxes[n], ToBoxes[k]]

SetOptions[EvaluationNotebook[], 
 InputAliases -> 
  DeleteDuplicates@
   Join[{"s1" -> 
      appearanceS1["\[SelectionPlaceholder]", "\[Placeholder]"], 
     "s2" -> appearanceS2["\[SelectionPlaceholder]", 
       "\[Placeholder]"]}, 
    InputAliases /. 

      Quiet[Options[EvaluationNotebook[], InputAliases]] /. 
     InputAliases -> {}]
 ]

In these definitions, I added one additional ingredient: the square and curly brackets for these symbols are not automatically extensible, so they don't grow like the round brackets used in Binomial. To fix this, I added a StyleBox with option SpanMaxSize -> Infinity.


Also, the shortcuts are be appended to the InputAliases without erasing previous definitions. To make the shortcuts work, this step has to be done after defining the wrapper functions appearance and appearanceS1/S2.


With this, you can get output like this:


s1


for StirlingS1 and


s2



for StirlingS2.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...
Post a Comment
Read more