Skip to main content

programming - Detecting patterns of black and white stones on a 2D board


I'm writing a program to play a game of Pente, and I'm struggling with the following question:



What's the best way to detect patterns on a two-dimensional board?



For example, in Pente a pair of neighboring stones of the same color can be captured when they are flanked from both sides by an opponent; how can we find all the stones that can be captured with the next move for the following board?


sample board



Below I show one possible straightforward solution, but with a defect: it's hard to extend it for other interesting patterns, i.e. three stones of the same color in a row surrounded by empty spaces, or four stones of the same color in a row which are flanked from one side but open from another, etc.



I'm wondering whether there is a way to define a DSL for detecting 2-dimensional structures like that on a board - sort of a 2D pattern matching.



P.S. I would also appreciate any advice on how to simplify the code below and make it more idiomatic - for example, I don't really like the way how sortStones is defined.


Straightforward solution


Here is one way to solve this problem (see below for graphics primitives to generate and display random boards):



  • Enumerate all subsets of 3 stones from the board above

  • Select those that form an AABE or ABBE pattern, where E denotes an unoccupied space



Lets store the board as a list of black and white stones,


a = {black[2, 1], black[4, 3], black[2, 5], black[4, 2], black[5, 3], 
black[1, 2], black[1, 3], black[5, 4], black[1, 5], white[3, 1],
white[4, 1], white[4, 4], white[3, 5], white[3, 4], white[5, 1],
white[5, 2], white[3, 3], white[1, 1]}

First, we define isTriple which checks whether three stones sorted by their x and y coordinates are in the same row next to each other and follow an ABB or AAB pattern:


isTriple[{a_, b_, c_}] := And[
(* A A B or A B B *)

Head[a] != Head[c] /. {black -> 1, white -> 0},
(* x and y coordinates are equally spaced *)
a[[1]] - b[[1]] == b[[1]] - c[[1]],
a[[2]] - b[[2]] == b[[2]] - c[[2]],
(* and are next to each other *)
Abs[a[[1]] - b[[1]]] <= 1,
Abs[a[[2]] - b[[2]]] <= 1]

Next, we determine the coordinates and the color of the stone that will kill the pair:


killerStone[{a_, b_, c_}] := 

If[Head[a] == Head[b] /. {black -> 1, white -> 0},
Head[c][2 a[[1]] - b[[1]], 2 a[[2]] - b[[2]]],
Head[a][2 c[[1]] - b[[1]], 2 c[[2]] - b[[2]]]]

Finally, we only select those triples where killer stone's space is not already occupied:


sortStones[l_] := 
Sort[l, OrderedQ[{#1, #2} /. {black -> List, white -> List}] &]

triplesToKill[board_] := Module[
{triples = Select[sortStones /@ Subsets[board, {3}], isTriple]},

Select[triples,
Block[
{ks = killerStone[#]},
FreeQ[board, _[ks[[1]], ks[[2]]]]] &]]

displayBoard[a, #] & /@ triplesToKill[a] //
Partition[#, 3, 3, {1, 1}, {}] & // GraphicsGrid

straightforward solution


Graphics primitives



randomPoints[n_] := RandomSample[Block[{nn = Ceiling[Sqrt[n]]},
Flatten[Table[{i, j}, {i, 1, nn}, {j, 1, nn}], 1]], n];
(* n is number of moves = 2 * number of points *)
randomBoard[n_] := Module[
{points = randomPoints[2 n]},
Join[
Take[points, n] /. {x_, y_} -> black[x, y],
Take[points, -n] /. {x_, y_} -> white[x, y]
]]


grid[minX_, minY_, maxX_, maxY_] :=
Line[Join[
Table[{{minX - 1.5, y}, {maxX + 1.5, y}}, {y, minY - 1.5, maxY + 1.5,
1}],
Table[{{x, minY - 1.5}, {x, maxY + 1.5}}, {x, minX - 1.5, maxX + 1.5,
1}]]];

displayBoard[board_] := Module[
{minX = Min[First /@ board], maxX = Max[First /@ board],
minY = Min[#[[2]] & /@ board], maxY = Max[#[[2]] & /@ board], n},

Graphics[{
grid[minX, minY, maxX, maxY],
board /. {
black[n__] -> {Black, Disk[{n}, .4]},
white[n__] -> {Thick, Circle[{n}, .4], White, Disk[{n}, .4]}
}}, ImageSize -> Small, Frame -> True]];

displayBoard[board_, points_] := Show[
displayBoard[board],
Graphics[

Map[{Red, Disk[{#[[1]], #[[2]]}, .2]} &, points]]]

Answer



One function comes to mind that already implements matching of multidimensonal rules: CellularAutomaton. Allow me to represent your board data like this:


board = SparseArray[
a /. h_[x_, y_] :> ({-y - 1, x + 1} -> h) /. {black -> ●, white -> ○}, {7, 7}, " "];

For my example I shall show a generic 3x3 rule operation, but this can easily be extended. I know of no built-in way to handle the reflections and translations of your rules, so I will assist with:


variants[x_, y_] := 
Union @@ Outer[
#@{y, x, y} ~Reverse~ #2 &,

{Identity, Transpose},
{{}, 1, 2, {1, 2}},
1
]

expand[h_[x : {_, _, _}, v_]] := variants[x, {_, _, _}] :> v // Thread

I now build the rules. The final rule merely keeps any element that is not at the center of a match unchanged.


rules = Join @@ expand /@ {
{○, ○, ●} -> "Q",

{○, ●, ●} -> "R",
{_, z_, _} :> z
};

Finally I apply them to my board. This shows the original, and after a single transformation:


MatrixForm /@ CellularAutomaton[rules, board, 1]

enter image description here


You can see that any appearance of the patterns in any orthogonal orientation (but not a diagonal) is "marked" by a Q or R at the center accordingly.


This is certainly not a complete implementation of what you requested but I hope that it gives you a reasonable place to start. Another would be ListCorrelate and a kernel large enough to encompass your patters, filled perhaps with unique powers of two, thereby yielding a unique value for each possible "filling" of the overlay.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...