Skip to main content

bugs - Random variables with transformed discrete distributions cannot be applied to Probability[] function?


I have two discrete uniform distributions over same support:


Dx = DiscreteUniformDistribution[{-8, 8}];  
Dy = DiscreteUniformDistribution[{-8, 8}];

I use random variables X ∼ Dx, Y ∼ Dy to model condition in some if-else clause in C code. For example,


if (3 * x + 1 > y) {
   ... 
}


So, I model this condition by random event 3*X + 1 > Y. Then probability I look for is:


Probability[
  x > y, 
  {Distributed[x, TransformedDistribution[3 * x + 1, Distributed[x, Dx]]],
   Distributed[y, Dy]}
]

Unfortunately, Mathematica produces nothing. As for me, this is very strange behavior because Mathematica also cannot compute mean for the product distribution of {X, Y}. Maybe, this problem is caused by different support of X and Y.


How can I compute this probability?




Answer



The following computes the probability you asked for, but I'm at a loss to understand why your notation won't work. It seems correct to me.


Probability[
 3 x + 1 > y, {Distributed[x, Dx], Distributed[y, Dy]}]

(*
==> 147/289
*)

The Probability / Distribution functions are quite young and hence not fully bulletproofed and I have encountered a number of bugs myself. I suppose/hope that in the next release they will be solved. I suggest you contact Wolfram support (support@wolfram.com). But perhaps someone else here may find out what's wrong.



A few of mine:


No random variates from PDFs that stem from multivariate distributions:


dist = ProbabilityDistribution[
   PDF[BinormalDistribution[{0, 0}, {1, 1}, 0]][{x, 
     y}], {x, -Infinity, Infinity}, {y, -Infinity, Infinity}];
RandomVariate[dist]

This works for 3, but not for 5 (and higher):


Expectation[x,x\[Distributed] OrderDistribution[{GeometricDistribution[0.1], 3}, 3]]
Expectation[x,x\[Distributed] OrderDistribution[{GeometricDistribution[0.1], 5}, 5]]


The following crashes the kernel after a minute or so (so, DO NOT EXECUTE):


PDF[TransformedDistribution[Sin[u], u \[Distributed] NormalDistribution[0, 1]], 0]

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more