Skip to main content

list manipulation - Applying filters to data of the form {{x1,y1},{x2,y2},...}


When working with any kind of measurement data there is (at least) for me always a phase where I have to play around with different filters (such as MedianFilter, MeanFilter, LowpassFilter ...) to figure out how to improve my data in some aspect (filtering noise, detecting outliers, detecting edges...). Two things have always bugged me when using the build-in filter functions:




  1. filters expect simple list like {y1,y2,y3,y4} when (more often than not) measurement data is of the form {{x1,y1}, {x2, y2}, {x3, y3}, {x4, y4}} where $x_i$ is some index (e.g. time or frequency) and $y_i$ is the respective measurement (e.g. voltage or force)




  2. filters have a syntax of the form someFilter[data, parameters] and not an operator form someFilter[parameters][data]





This leads often to a Kuddelmuddel of [[]] mixed with a bunch of Transpose and/or intermediate (global) variables


What is a stylistically good way to deal with this?



Answer



The answer I came up with is


Clear@applyFilter;
applyFilter[filter_] := Function[data,
Module[{freq, value},
{freq, value} = Transpose@data;

Transpose[{freq, filter@value}]
]
];

applyFilter[filters__] := RightComposition @@ (applyFilter /@ {filters})

applyFilter[{filter_, n_}] := Nest[applyFilter[filter], # , n] &

The features are:





  1. Applying filters in operator form


    applyFilter[MedianFilter[#, 5] &] @ someData


  2. Chaining filters together


    myfilter = applyFilter[
    MedianFilter[#, 5] &,
    MeanFilter[#,2 ] &
    ]

    (*used with myfilter @ someData *)


  3. Multiple filter passes


    applyFilter[{MeanFilter[#, 2] &, numberOfPasses}]


and can be used on some example data


example = Transpose[{Range@100, Accumulate@(RandomVariate[NormalDistribution[0, 1], 100])}]


example data


with for instance a MedianFilter to flatten the peaks/remove outliers


applyFilter[MedianFilter[#, 3] &] @ example

median filter


or a MedianFilter followed up by a MeanFilter (this can be advantageous compared to using only a MeanFilter if there are huge outliers in the data)


applyFilter[MedianFilter[#, 3] &, MeanFilter[#, 2] &] @ example

median filter + mean filter


or multiple passes of some filter (1 pass through MedianFilter and 10 passes through MeanFilter)



applyFilter[MedianFilter[#, 3] &, {MeanFilter[#, 2] &, 10}] @ example

median + 10 passes mean


For me at least, something like applyFilter makes using the build-in filters a lot more user-friendy when experimenting with data.


Manipulate[
ListLinePlot[{
example,
applyFilter[MedianFilter[#, r] &, {MeanFilter[#, r1] &, n}]@example}],

{{r, 0, "Medianfilter radius"}, 0, 10, 1}, Delimiter,

{{n, 0, "Meanfilter passes"}, 0, 10, 1},
{{r1, 0, "Meanfilter radius"}, 0, 10, 1}]

gif


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...