Skip to main content

list manipulation - Applying filters to data of the form {{x1,y1},{x2,y2},...}


When working with any kind of measurement data there is (at least) for me always a phase where I have to play around with different filters (such as MedianFilter, MeanFilter, LowpassFilter ...) to figure out how to improve my data in some aspect (filtering noise, detecting outliers, detecting edges...). Two things have always bugged me when using the build-in filter functions:




  1. filters expect simple list like {y1,y2,y3,y4} when (more often than not) measurement data is of the form {{x1,y1}, {x2, y2}, {x3, y3}, {x4, y4}} where xi is some index (e.g. time or frequency) and yi is the respective measurement (e.g. voltage or force)




  2. filters have a syntax of the form someFilter[data, parameters] and not an operator form someFilter[parameters][data]





This leads often to a Kuddelmuddel of [[]] mixed with a bunch of Transpose and/or intermediate (global) variables


What is a stylistically good way to deal with this?



Answer



The answer I came up with is


Clear@applyFilter;
applyFilter[filter_] := Function[data,
Module[{freq, value},
{freq, value} = Transpose@data;

Transpose[{freq, filter@value}]
]
];

applyFilter[filters__] := RightComposition @@ (applyFilter /@ {filters})

applyFilter[{filter_, n_}] := Nest[applyFilter[filter], # , n] &

The features are:





  1. Applying filters in operator form


    applyFilter[MedianFilter[#, 5] &] @ someData


  2. Chaining filters together


    myfilter = applyFilter[
    MedianFilter[#, 5] &,
    MeanFilter[#,2 ] &
    ]

    (*used with myfilter @ someData *)


  3. Multiple filter passes


    applyFilter[{MeanFilter[#, 2] &, numberOfPasses}]


and can be used on some example data


example = Transpose[{Range@100, Accumulate@(RandomVariate[NormalDistribution[0, 1], 100])}]


example data


with for instance a MedianFilter to flatten the peaks/remove outliers


applyFilter[MedianFilter[#, 3] &] @ example

median filter


or a MedianFilter followed up by a MeanFilter (this can be advantageous compared to using only a MeanFilter if there are huge outliers in the data)


applyFilter[MedianFilter[#, 3] &, MeanFilter[#, 2] &] @ example

median filter + mean filter


or multiple passes of some filter (1 pass through MedianFilter and 10 passes through MeanFilter)



applyFilter[MedianFilter[#, 3] &, {MeanFilter[#, 2] &, 10}] @ example

median + 10 passes mean


For me at least, something like applyFilter makes using the build-in filters a lot more user-friendy when experimenting with data.


Manipulate[
ListLinePlot[{
example,
applyFilter[MedianFilter[#, r] &, {MeanFilter[#, r1] &, n}]@example}],

{{r, 0, "Medianfilter radius"}, 0, 10, 1}, Delimiter,

{{n, 0, "Meanfilter passes"}, 0, 10, 1},
{{r1, 0, "Meanfilter radius"}, 0, 10, 1}]

gif


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]