Skip to main content

symbolic - How to decompose a complex expression containing repeated subexpressions?



Suppose I have an expression like


1/8 + 1/8 Sqrt[1 - 28 (2/(3 (Sqrt[4197] - 9)))^(1/3) + 2 (2/3)^(2/3) (Sqrt[4197] - 9)^(1/3)]
- 1/2 Sqrt[1/8 - (1/2 (Sqrt[4197] - 9))^(1/3)/(4 3^(2/3)) + 7/(2 2^(2/3) (3 (Sqrt[4197] - 9))^(1/3))
- 7/(8 Sqrt[1 - 28 (2/(3 (Sqrt[4197] - 9)))^(1/3) + 2 (2/3)^(2/3) (Sqrt[4197] - 9)^(1/3)])]


which contains repeated common subexpressions. I am interested in an algorithm that can decompose it into parts of the minimal (or close to minimal) total complexity. The expected output should be something like this:


(1 + α - Sqrt[3 - β - 14/α]) / 8 
/. α -> Sqrt[β]
/. β -> 1 + 2 γ - 56/(3 γ)
/. γ -> (4 Sqrt[4197]/9 - 4)^(1/3)

(if you ever worked with Maple, this is similar to how it formats complex output expressions)



Answer



I once tried doing something like this myself, and ended up with a semi-manual process.



Clear[branches, tallyBranches];
branches[b_?AtomQ] := {};
branches[b_?NumberQ] := {};
branches[h_[b___]] := Flatten@Append[branches /@ List[b], h[b]];
tallyBranches[e_, k_Integer: 2] :=
TableForm[Reverse /@ Cases[Tally[branches[e]], {_, t_ /; t >= k}]]

Let's take the solution to the cubic as an example:


cube = Solve[a x^3 + b x^2 + c x + d == 0, x];


Generate a table of common branches (with at least 9 occurrences):


tallyBranches[cube, 9]

9 1/a
9 b^2
9 -b^2
9 3 a c
9 -b^2+3 a c
12 b^3
12 -2 b^3

12 9 a b c
12 a^2
12 -27 a^2 d

Then we can manually pick a branch to substitute:


cube2 = cube //. -b^2 + 3 a c -> α;

And then repeat:


tallyBranches[cube2, 6];


Etc..


After three substitutions we end up with something like this:


{{x→−3√2α3a3√γ−b3a+3√γ33√2a},{x→(1+i√3)α3 22/3a3√γ−b3a−(1−i√3)3√γ63√2a},{x→(1−i√3)α3 22/3a3√γ−b3a−(1+i√3)3√γ63√2a}}


where α=3ac−b2, β=−27a2d+9abc−2b3, and γ=√4α3+β2+β.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]