Skip to main content

function construction - A question about two ways to use Default


Usually we define a function with default values by the syntax x_:default, but there is another technique to do this by registering a global default value with Default. In the Document, there are three ways to use Default, two of which have confused me.


The document tells that




Default[f,i] gives the default value to use when _. appears as the i-th argument of f



, while



Default[f,i,n] gives the default value for the i-th argument out of a total of n arguments



. Therefore, I have tried the following comparison:


Default[f, 1] = a1;
Default[f, 2] = a2;

Default[f, 3] = a3;
f[x_., y_., z_.] := {x, y, z}
{f[], f[1], f[1, 2], f[1, 2, 3]}

The result is {{a1, a2, a3}, {1, a2, a3}, {1, 2, a3}, {1, 2, 3}}.


ClearAll[f];
Default[f, 1, 3] = a1;
Default[f, 2, 3] = a2;
Default[f, 3, 3] = a3;
f[x_., y_., z_.] := {x, y, z}

{f[], f[1], f[1, 2], f[1, 2, 3]}

This give the same result.


It seems that there is no difference between these two ways to use Default. If there were no difference, why would the document list the two ways?


I'd appreciate it if someone could provide some information.



Answer



The third parameter allows control of Optional behavior for multiple function definitions. It is not attached to the number of actual arguments passed to the function but rather to the number of arguments that appear in the function definition itself. Consider this example:


ClearAll[f];

Default[f, 1, 3] = a1;

Default[f, 2, 3] = a2;
Default[f, 3, 3] = a3;
f[x_., y_., z_.] := {x, y, z}

Default[f, 1, 2] = Q;
Default[f, 2, 2] = R;
f[x_., Optional[y_Symbol]] := foo[x, y]

Now:


{f[], f[1], f[1, 2], f[1, 2, 3]}



{foo[Q, R], foo[1, R], {1, 2, a3}, {1, 2, 3}}

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...