Skip to main content

equation solving - best way for finding approximate root of monotonic sawtooth like function


First I will generate such kind of monotonic sawtooth like function called func


n = 50;

block = Symmetrize[RandomReal[1., {n, n}], Symmetric[{1, 2}]];
diagF = SparseArray[Band[{1, 1}] -> Normal /@ #] &;
mat = diagF[{block, block, block, block}];
dim = Length@mat;
eigs = Transpose@Sort@Transpose@Eigensystem@mat;
eigsdensity = {eigs[[1]], Abs[eigs[[2]]]^2};
fermiCom =
Compile[{{e, _Real}, {u, _Real}, {t, _Real}},
Module[{tmp}, tmp = Exp[(u - e)/t]; tmp = 1./(1. + tmp);
tmp = 1. - tmp], RuntimeOptions -> "Speed"];

Clear[fermi];
fermi[e_?NumericQ, u_?NumericQ, t_?NumericQ] := fermiCom[e, u, t];
num = Length@Select[eigs[[1]], # < 0 &] + 1;
Clear[func];
func[u_] :=
Total[Sum[
eigsdensity[[2, i]] fermi[eigs[[1, i]], u, 0.0001], {i, 1, dim}]]

The plot of func is like this


Plot[func[u], {u, -3, 3}]


enter image description here


This is what I call monomotic sawtooth like function


Now I want to know at which u value, func[u] is closest to num ( num = Length@Select[eigs[[1]], # < 0 &] + 1)


Normally, FindRoot fastest for this kind of task. However it is not working for this problem


FindRoot[func[u] - num == 0, {u, 0}]

gives error



FindRoot::jsing: Encountered a singular Jacobian at the point {u} = {0.}. Try perturbing the initial point(s). >>




This is because num is a value guaranteed to be between two plateaus (the fermi function is very close to step function, while not exactly the same), so it can't find such a root.


Then, we can transform the problem into a minimization problem. That is to minimize Abs[func[u] - num]


HoweverFindMinimum is also not working.


FindMinimum[Abs[func[u] - num], u]


FindMinimum::fmgz: Encountered a gradient that is effectively zero. The result returned may not be a minimum; it may be a maximum or a saddle point. >>



The only working, I know at the moment is NMinimize



NMinimize[Abs[func[u] - num], u] // AbsoluteTiming
(*{0.934564, {1., {u -> 0.0116856}}}*)

But as you can see NMinimize is really expensive. So I wonder, since the func such a good monotonic property, is there a better way than direct NMinimize?



Answer



From the FindRoot documentation:



FindRoot[lhs == rhs, {x, x0, x1}] searches for a solution using $x_0$ and $x_1$ as the first two values of $x$, avoiding the use of derivatives. ... If you specify two starting values, FindRoot uses a variant of the secant method.



Indeed, that does the job pretty much instantly:



FindRoot[func[u] - num == 0, {u, -3, 3}]
(* {u -> 0.00249415} *)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.