Skip to main content

Possible Bug in ProbitModelFit when used in a Dataset


Since upgrading to Mathematica 10 on Mac OSX I have come across a number of instances of this error, which occurs using Probit and Logit model fit.


enter image description here



A bit of googling show this is something to do with the estimation algorithm.


But the issue is more complex. When I estimate the model straight from this dataset I get the error, but when I first take the values of the data, then fit the model, I get the expected result.


Here's an example


var = {age, gender, photo6};

mTest = SemanticImport[
"https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3997716/test.csv"];

testFit =
mTest[ProbitModelFit[#, var,

var] &, {#age, #gender, #photo6, #rawM} &]

testFit2 =
ProbitModelFit[#, var,
var] &@(mTest[All, {"age", "gender", "photo6", "rawM"}] //
Normal // Values)

Output of this is


enter image description here


Why the two different results for the same calculation? Is there a workaround that allows the estimation to proceed when directly using the dataset?




Answer



I believe that this is a bug. The rest of this response speculates as to the possible cause.


We start by observing that the test can be made to work by suppressing MissingBehaviour:


mTest[
ProbitModelFit[#, var, var] &
, {#age, #gender, #photo6, #rawM} &
, MissingBehavior -> None
]

result screenshot



It also works if FailureAction -> None is specified instead, but then the exhibited error message about non-real values is produced (along with the correct result).


As noted elsewhere MissingBehavior is implemented by Dataset`WithOverrides. ??Dataset`WithOverrides reveals that this function temporarily alters the definitions of a number of symbols, namely those in this list:


Dataset`Overrides`PackagePrivate`$AllChangedSymbols

(* { Commonest,First,InterquartileRange,Kurtosis,Last,Mean,Median,Missing,Most,
Quartiles,Rest,RootMeanSquare,Skewness,StandardDeviation,Total,Variance }
*)

It so happens that ProbitModelFit uses Total. We can verify that fact like this:


$data = mTest[All, {#age, #gender, #photo6, #rawM} &];


On @@ Dataset`Overrides`PackagePrivate`$AllChangedSymbols

ProbitModelFit[$data // Normal, {age, gender, photo6}, {age, gender, photo6}]

Off[]

(* ... produces many trace messages containing Total ... *)

It would appear that the patching performed by Dataset`WithOverrides is interfering with the operation of ProbitModelFit. We can simulate this by engaging in some patching of our own:



Internal`InheritedBlock[{Total}
, Unprotect @ Total
; Total[n___] /; False := Null
; ProbitModelFit[$data // Normal,{age,gender,photo6},{age,gender,photo6}]
]

result screenshot


This patch is even less invasive than the one installed by Dataset`WithOverrides, and yet it generates the same error message (and the same correct output). It would seem that ProbitModelFit is expecting Total to operate exactly as it is shipped -- nothing more, nothing less.


Conclusion


ProbitModelFit does not function properly within a query with default missing- and failure-handling. The missing-handling alters the definition of Total in a manner that causes ProbitModelFit to issue a warning message. The failure-handling sees that message and, by default, fails the whole query operation. Correct operation can be restored by either disabling the missing-handling, the failure-handling, or both.



The missing-handling is implemented by monkey-patching various low-level system components. This patching implements the proper Query semantics, at the cost of disturbing normal non-query system behaviour. Such disturbances are a frequent consequence of monkey-patching. The patching methodology explains not only the issue under discussion, but a number of other erratic Dataset behaviours logged on this site.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.