Since upgrading to Mathematica 10 on Mac OSX I have come across a number of instances of this error, which occurs using Probit and Logit model fit.
A bit of googling show this is something to do with the estimation algorithm.
But the issue is more complex. When I estimate the model straight from this dataset I get the error, but when I first take the values of the data, then fit the model, I get the expected result.
Here's an example
var = {age, gender, photo6};
mTest = SemanticImport[
"https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3997716/test.csv"];
testFit =
mTest[ProbitModelFit[#, var,
var] &, {#age, #gender, #photo6, #rawM} &]
testFit2 =
ProbitModelFit[#, var,
var] &@(mTest[All, {"age", "gender", "photo6", "rawM"}] //
Normal // Values)
Output of this is
Why the two different results for the same calculation? Is there a workaround that allows the estimation to proceed when directly using the dataset?
Answer
I believe that this is a bug. The rest of this response speculates as to the possible cause.
We start by observing that the test can be made to work by suppressing MissingBehaviour
:
mTest[
ProbitModelFit[#, var, var] &
, {#age, #gender, #photo6, #rawM} &
, MissingBehavior -> None
]
It also works if FailureAction -> None
is specified instead, but then the exhibited error message about non-real values is produced (along with the correct result).
As noted elsewhere MissingBehavior
is implemented by Dataset`WithOverrides
. ??Dataset`WithOverrides
reveals that this function temporarily alters the definitions of a number of symbols, namely those in this list:
Dataset`Overrides`PackagePrivate`$AllChangedSymbols
(* { Commonest,First,InterquartileRange,Kurtosis,Last,Mean,Median,Missing,Most,
Quartiles,Rest,RootMeanSquare,Skewness,StandardDeviation,Total,Variance }
*)
It so happens that ProbitModelFit
uses Total
. We can verify that fact like this:
$data = mTest[All, {#age, #gender, #photo6, #rawM} &];
On @@ Dataset`Overrides`PackagePrivate`$AllChangedSymbols
ProbitModelFit[$data // Normal, {age, gender, photo6}, {age, gender, photo6}]
Off[]
(* ... produces many trace messages containing Total ... *)
It would appear that the patching performed by Dataset`WithOverrides
is interfering with the operation of ProbitModelFit
. We can simulate this by engaging in some patching of our own:
Internal`InheritedBlock[{Total}
, Unprotect @ Total
; Total[n___] /; False := Null
; ProbitModelFit[$data // Normal,{age,gender,photo6},{age,gender,photo6}]
]
This patch is even less invasive than the one installed by Dataset`WithOverrides
, and yet it generates the same error message (and the same correct output). It would seem that ProbitModelFit
is expecting Total
to operate exactly as it is shipped -- nothing more, nothing less.
Conclusion
ProbitModelFit
does not function properly within a query with default missing- and failure-handling. The missing-handling alters the definition of Total
in a manner that causes ProbitModelFit
to issue a warning message. The failure-handling sees that message and, by default, fails the whole query operation. Correct operation can be restored by either disabling the missing-handling, the failure-handling, or both.
The missing-handling is implemented by monkey-patching various low-level system components. This patching implements the proper Query
semantics, at the cost of disturbing normal non-query system behaviour. Such disturbances are a frequent consequence of monkey-patching. The patching methodology explains not only the issue under discussion, but a number of other erratic Dataset
behaviours logged on this site.
Comments
Post a Comment