Skip to main content

programming - How does Needs["foo`"] find the file that defines context "foo`"?



The post's title says it all, but if more detail is needed:


Suppose I have the following in some file /path/to/foo.m:


Begin["foo`"];
hello = Function[{}, Print["Hello world!"]];
End[];

...and in some other file, say, ./client.m, I put the following


Needs["foo`"];
foo`hello[];


Then, when the Needs expression gets evaluated, I get the error


Needs::nocont: Context foo` was not created when Needs was evaluated.

I'm too surprised by this error, since I see no good way for Mathematica to find where foo` is defined.


(BTW, putting /path/to in $Path does not change the results described above.)


What else must I put in ./client.m, besides Needs["foo`"], so that the expression foo`hello[] evaluates properly?




EDIT: I should explain that the reason I'm using Begin instead of BeginPackage is that I want to enforce full qualified names (e.g. foo`hello, rather than plain hello) as the only way to refer to imported functions.



Answer



This post answers specifically the title question:




How does Needs["foo`"] find the file that defines context "foo`"?





Get, Needs, Install, OpenRead, etc. all use FindFile. How FindFile resolves file names is discussed in:





I don't know the full details (it's complicated), but roughly FindFile translates a context to a file path as follows:


FindFile["foo`"] either




  • Looks on $Path for foo.m, foo.wl, foo.mx or directory foo

  • If a paclet declares the context foo` in its Kernel extension, it translates to the corresponding Root directory: See PacletInfo.m documentation project, Kernel extension section.


Then if the result was a directory dir, it continues to look for



  • dir/init.m (or init.wl)

  • dir/Kernel/init.m (or init.wl)


If the result was a directory dir.mx, it continues to look for




  • dir.mx/$SystemID/dir.mx (insert the value of $SystemID)


This is useful because .mx files are not compatible across different platforms.




FindFile["foo"], where foo is not a context,



  • Looks on $Path for foo.


If the result is a directory, then it continues to look for




  • foo/$SystemID/foo


This is useful with Install, when we need a separate executable for each $SystemID, but we want to be able to use the same name to refer to them on any platform.




Notes


The context of a package, i.e. the context given in BeginPackage that will contain the public package symbols, does not play any role in how FindFile resolves a context name to a file path.


However, Needs is different from Get in that it expects the context passed to it to appear in $Packages after the package has been loaded. This is why one needs to use BeginPackage and not merely Begin when writing a package. BeginPackage will permanently add that context both to $ContextPath and $Packages. Needs uses $Packages to determine if a package has already been loaded and avoid double-loading.


In short, the file names and the context of a package don't strictly need to be the same. But if they aren't, Mathematica will sometimes get confused.


The rules described above explain why the standard application directory structure is as described here. There is nothing strictly enforcing this particular structure, but the system is designed in a way that it expects to find this structure in any package.





Some interesting undocumented variables:




  • Internal`$PackageDependencies is updated by BeginPackage based on its second argument




  • $LoadedFiles is updated by Get. To get a more useful list, use Select[$LoadedFiles, Not@StringStartsQ[#, $InstallationDirectory] &]




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...