Skip to main content

programming - How does Needs["foo`"] find the file that defines context "foo`"?



The post's title says it all, but if more detail is needed:


Suppose I have the following in some file /path/to/foo.m:


Begin["foo`"];
hello = Function[{}, Print["Hello world!"]];
End[];

...and in some other file, say, ./client.m, I put the following


Needs["foo`"];
foo`hello[];


Then, when the Needs expression gets evaluated, I get the error


Needs::nocont: Context foo` was not created when Needs was evaluated.

I'm too surprised by this error, since I see no good way for Mathematica to find where foo` is defined.


(BTW, putting /path/to in $Path does not change the results described above.)


What else must I put in ./client.m, besides Needs["foo`"], so that the expression foo`hello[] evaluates properly?




EDIT: I should explain that the reason I'm using Begin instead of BeginPackage is that I want to enforce full qualified names (e.g. foo`hello, rather than plain hello) as the only way to refer to imported functions.



Answer



This post answers specifically the title question:




How does Needs["foo`"] find the file that defines context "foo`"?





Get, Needs, Install, OpenRead, etc. all use FindFile. How FindFile resolves file names is discussed in:





I don't know the full details (it's complicated), but roughly FindFile translates a context to a file path as follows:


FindFile["foo`"] either




  • Looks on $Path for foo.m, foo.wl, foo.mx or directory foo

  • If a paclet declares the context foo` in its Kernel extension, it translates to the corresponding Root directory: See PacletInfo.m documentation project, Kernel extension section.


Then if the result was a directory dir, it continues to look for



  • dir/init.m (or init.wl)

  • dir/Kernel/init.m (or init.wl)


If the result was a directory dir.mx, it continues to look for




  • dir.mx/$SystemID/dir.mx (insert the value of $SystemID)


This is useful because .mx files are not compatible across different platforms.




FindFile["foo"], where foo is not a context,



  • Looks on $Path for foo.


If the result is a directory, then it continues to look for




  • foo/$SystemID/foo


This is useful with Install, when we need a separate executable for each $SystemID, but we want to be able to use the same name to refer to them on any platform.




Notes


The context of a package, i.e. the context given in BeginPackage that will contain the public package symbols, does not play any role in how FindFile resolves a context name to a file path.


However, Needs is different from Get in that it expects the context passed to it to appear in $Packages after the package has been loaded. This is why one needs to use BeginPackage and not merely Begin when writing a package. BeginPackage will permanently add that context both to $ContextPath and $Packages. Needs uses $Packages to determine if a package has already been loaded and avoid double-loading.


In short, the file names and the context of a package don't strictly need to be the same. But if they aren't, Mathematica will sometimes get confused.


The rules described above explain why the standard application directory structure is as described here. There is nothing strictly enforcing this particular structure, but the system is designed in a way that it expects to find this structure in any package.





Some interesting undocumented variables:




  • Internal`$PackageDependencies is updated by BeginPackage based on its second argument




  • $LoadedFiles is updated by Get. To get a more useful list, use Select[$LoadedFiles, Not@StringStartsQ[#, $InstallationDirectory] &]




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.