Skip to main content

symbols - TeXForm and Symbolize


I would like to use TeXForm to generate LaTeX output as usual. However, I use subscripted variables such as c_t. Unfortunately, when using Symbolize from the package Notation for this end, TeXForm does not work as expected. While I expected output such as c_t, I receive:


Needs["Notation`"];
Symbolize[ParsedBoxWrapper[SubscriptBox["_", "_"]]];
TeXForm[c_t]

\text{c$\mathsym{\UnderBracket}$Subscript$\mathsym{\UnderBracket}$t}.


Can anyone think of a better solution?


Thanks.



Answer




When you load Notation` package it automatically assigns definitions to MakeExpression and MakeBoxes function. Those definitions call NotationMakeExpression and NotationMakeBoxes functions respectively.


After symbolizing expression with a pattern, special definition is assigned to NotationMakeExpression function. This definition forces Mathematica to perform some tasks when expression, matching symbolized pattern, is encountered. A symbol, with name reflecting symbolized expression, is constructed, then special rules for this symbol are assigned to NotationMakeBoxes. These rules tell Mathematica what is box representation of constructed symbol in StandardForm.


Since only definitions for StandardForm are added, specially constructed symbol looks like symbolized expression in StandardForm and possibly other forms that use StandardForm boxes, but not in other forms.


TeXForm uses boxes from TraditionalForm not StandardForm. To solve your problem in general way for all symbolized subscripted expressions you could inspect NotationMakeBoxes definition and assign correct TraditionalForm to all symbols that have SubscriptBox assigned to StandardForm.


Let's define some functions that will do this automatically. We start with function that converts boxes in StandardForm to boxes in TraditionalForm:



SetAttributes[standardToTraditionalBoxes, HoldAllComplete]
standardToTraditionalBoxes[boxes_] :=
Function[expr, MakeBoxes[expr, TraditionalForm], HoldAllComplete] @@
MakeExpression[boxes, StandardForm]

Now a function converting NotationMakeBoxes down value to proper MakeBoxes definition for TraditionalForm:


addSubscriptTraditionalForm[
Verbatim[HoldPattern][
Verbatim[Condition][
Notation`NotationMakeBoxes[sym_Symbol, StandardForm],

_
]
] :>
SubscriptBox[x_, y_]
] := (
sym /: MakeBoxes[sym, TraditionalForm] =
SubscriptBox[standardToTraditionalBoxes[x],standardToTraditionalBoxes[y]]
)

And final function traversing down values:



updateSubscriptTraditionalForm[] := 
Scan[addSubscriptTraditionalForm, DownValues[Notation`NotationMakeBoxes]]

updateSubscriptTraditionalForm function should be evaluated after all symbolized expressions were read by Mathematica and before using TeXForm.


Small test


Load Notation` and symbolize all expressions with subscripts:


Needs["Notation`"]
Symbolize[ParsedBoxWrapper[SubscriptBox["_", "_"]]]

Now some strange test expression:




f[a + b]Sin[c]



in FullForm gives:


f\[UnderBracket]LeftBracket\[UnderBracket]a\[UnderBracket]Plus\[UnderBracket]b\[UnderBracket]RightBracket\[UnderBracket]Subscript\[UnderBracket]Sin\[UnderBracket]LeftBracket\[UnderBracket]c\[UnderBracket]RightBracket

in TeXForm, before evaluating updateSubscriptTraditionalForm, gives:


\text{f$\mathsym{\UnderBracket}$LeftBracket$\mathsym{\UnderBracket}$a$\mathsym{\UnderBracket}$Plus$\mathsym{\UnderBracket}$b$\mathsym{\UnderBracket}$RightBracket$\mathsym{\UnderBracket}$Subscript$\mathsym{\UnderBracket}$Sin$\mathsym{\UnderBracket}$LeftBracket$\mathsym{\UnderBracket}$c$\mathsym{\UnderBracket}$RightBracket}

and after updateSubscriptTraditionalForm evaluation, TeXForm gives:



f(a+b)_{\sin (c)}




After using Symbolize ct looks in FullForm like this:


c\[UnderBracket]Subscript\[UnderBracket]t

So result you're getting is a "correct" translation to TeX of above expression.


c\[UnderBracket]Subscript\[UnderBracket]t//TeXForm
(* \text{c$\mathsym{\UnderBracket}$Subscript$\mathsym{\UnderBracket}$t} *)


To get desired result you can add formatting rule to this expression using my TeXUtilities package.


Import["https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jkuczm/MathematicaTeXUtilities/master/NoInstall.m"]
Format[c\[UnderBracket]Subscript\[UnderBracket]t, TeXForm] = TeXVerbatim["c_t"];

c\[UnderBracket]Subscript\[UnderBracket]t//TeXForm
(* c_t *)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....