Skip to main content

compile - List of compilable functions


Is there somewhere a list on the functions that Compile can compile, or the cases in which a particular function can be compiled that I haven't found? I'd be glad even with a list of some of them which surprisingly aren't compilable, and how to do without them.


I am not happy every time I have to rewrite or redesign code because it seems to make external calls for functions I didn't expect. I'd like to know how you handle all that, what you keep in mind.



Answer



Yes, but this only exists in version 8 onwards and is undocumented:


Compile`CompilerFunctions[] // Sort

giving, for reference:


{Abs, AddTo, And, Append, AppendTo, Apply, ArcCos, ArcCosh, ArcCot, ArcCoth, ArcCsc,
ArcCsch, ArcSec, ArcSech, ArcSin, ArcSinh, ArcTan, ArcTanh, Arg, Array, ArrayDepth,

Internal`Bag, Internal`BagPart, BitAnd, BitNot, BitOr, BitXor, Block, BlockRandom, Boole,
Break, Cases, Catch, Ceiling, Chop, Internal`CompileError, System`Private`CompileSymbol,
Complement, ComposeList, CompoundExpression, Conjugate, ConjugateTranspose, Continue,
Cos, Cosh, Cot, Coth, Count, Csc, Csch, Decrement, Delete, DeleteCases, Dimensions,
Divide, DivideBy, Do, Dot, Drop, Equal, Erf, Erfc, EvenQ, Exp, Fibonacci, First,
FixedPoint, FixedPointList, Flatten, NDSolve`FEM`FlattenAll, Floor, Fold, FoldList, For,
FractionalPart, FreeQ, Compile`GetElement, Goto, Greater, GreaterEqual, Gudermannian,
Haversine, If, Im, Implies, Increment, Inequality, Compile`InnerDo, Insert,
IntegerDigits, IntegerPart, Intersection, InverseGudermannian, InverseHaversine,
Compile`IteratorCount, Join, Label, Last, Length, Less, LessEqual, List, Log, Log10,

Log2, LucasL, Map, MapAll, MapAt, MapIndexed, MapThread, NDSolve`FEM`MapThreadDot,
MatrixQ, Max, MemberQ, Min, Minus, Mod, Compile`Mod1, Module, Most, N, Negative, Nest,
NestList, NonNegative, Not, OddQ, Or, OrderedQ, Out, Outer, Part, Partition, Piecewise,
Plus, Position, Positive, Power, PreDecrement, PreIncrement, Prepend, PrependTo, Product,
Quotient, Random, RandomChoice, RandomComplex, RandomInteger, RandomReal, RandomSample,
RandomVariate, Range, Re, ReplacePart, Rest, Return, Reverse, RotateLeft, RotateRight,
Round, RuleCondition, SameQ, Scan, Sec, Sech, SeedRandom, Select, Set, SetDelayed,
Compile`SetIterate, Sign, Sin, Sinc, Sinh, Sort, Sqrt, Internal`Square, Internal`StuffBag,
Subtract, SubtractFrom, Sum, Switch, Table, Take, Tan, Tanh, TensorRank, Throw, Times,
TimesBy, Tr, Transpose, Unequal, Union, Unitize, UnitStep, UnsameQ, VectorQ, Which,

While, With, Xor}

As of Mathematica 10.0.2, there are also the following functions:


{Gamma, Indexed, LogGamma, LogisticSigmoid, Internal`ReciprocalSqrt}

As of Mathematica 11, there are also the following functions:


{Internal`Expm1, Internal`Log1p, Ramp}

As of Mathematica 11.2, there are also the following functions:


{RealAbs, RealSign}


About Tr:


Please note that Tr appears in this list, but cannot actually be compiled without a call to MainEvaluate[]. It is unclear if this is deliberate or a bug.




Edit: additional functions


I have just discovered the symbol Internal`CompileValues, which provides various definitions and function calls needed to compile further functions not in the list above. Using the following code,


Internal`CompileValues[]; (* to trigger auto-load *)
ClearAttributes[Internal`CompileValues, ReadProtected];
syms = DownValues[Internal`CompileValues] /.
HoldPattern[Verbatim[HoldPattern][Internal`CompileValues[sym_]] :> _] :>

sym;
Complement[syms, Compile`CompilerFunctions[]]

we get some more compilable functions as follows:


{Accumulate, ConstantArray, Cross, Depth, Det, DiagonalMatrix,
Differences, NDSolve`FEM`FEMDot, NDSolve`FEM`FEMHold,
NDSolve`FEM`FEMInverse, NDSolve`FEM`FEMPart, NDSolve`FEM`FEMTDot,
NDSolve`FEM`FEMTotalTimes, NDSolve`FEM`FEMZeroMatrix, FromDigits,
Identity, IdentityMatrix, Inverse, LinearSolve, Mean, Median, Nand,
NestWhile, NestWhileList, Nor, Norm, Ordering, PadLeft, PadRight,

Permutations, Ratios, Signature, SquareWave, StandardDeviation,
Tally, Total, TrueQ, Variance}

Looking at the definition of Internal`CompileValues[sym] for sym in the list above will provide some additional information about how these functions are compiled. This can range from type information (for e.g. Inverse), through to an implementation in terms of lower-level functions (e.g. NestWhileList). One can presumably also make one's own implementations of non-compilable functions using this mechanism, giving Compile the ability to compile a wider range of functions than it usually would be able to.


As of Mathematica 10.3, there are also the following functions:


{DeleteDuplicates, Region`Mesh`SmallMatrixRank,
Region`Mesh`SmallQRSolve, Region`Mesh`SmallSingularValues,
Region`Mesh`SmallSingularValueSystem, Region`Mesh`SmallSVDSolve,
NDSolve`SwitchingVariable}


As of Mathematica 11, there are also the following functions:


{NearestFunction, RegionDistanceFunction, RegionMemberFunction, RegionNearestFunction}



Edit 2: the meaning of the second list


In response to a recent question, I want to be clear that the presence of a function in the second list given above does not necessarily mean it can be compiled into a form free of MainEvaluate calls. If a top-level function is already highly optimized (as e.g. LinearSolve is), the purpose of Internal`CompileValues[func] may be solely to provide type information on the return value, assuming that this can be inferred from the types of the arguments or some other salient information. This mechanism allows more complex functions that call these highly-optimized top-level functions to be compiled more completely since there is no longer any question of what the return type may be and so further unnecessary MainEvaluate calls may be avoided. It does not imply that the use of MainEvaluate is unnecessary to call the function itself.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...