Skip to main content

simplifying expressions - Different outputs for Simplify


In at least one instance, the same Simplify command (without using options) produces very different results on two of my computers, one Windows 7 and the other Windows 10. Here is the code:


sf = Simplify;

r1 = (-1 + (-11 - a^2 + 2 a^4) b^2 + (8 - 3 a^2) b^3 + (-2 + a^2) b^4 - 
     b (-6 - 3 a^2 + a Sqrt[b (2 + (-2 + a^2) b)] + 
        2 a^3 Sqrt[b (2 + (-2 + a^2) b)]) - 
     a (Sqrt[b (2 + (-2 + a^2) b)] - 3 Sqrt[b^5 (2 + (-2 + a^2) b)] + Sqrt[

        b^7 (2 + (-2 + a^2) b)]))/(-1 + b - a^2 b + 
     a Sqrt[b (2 + (-2 + a^2) b)])^2;

This is what I got on one of the computers, the Windows 10 one:


Dr1 = D[r1, b] // sf 

(* (6 + 3 a^2 + 2 (-11 - a^2 + 2 a^4) b + 3 (8 - 3 a^2) b^2 + 
    4 (-2 + a^2) b^3 - (a (1 + (-2 + a^2) b))/Sqrt[b (2 + (-2 + a^2) b)] - (
    a b (1 + (-2 + a^2) b))/Sqrt[b (2 + (-2 + a^2) b)] - (
    2 a^3 b (1 + (-2 + a^2) b))/Sqrt[b (2 + (-2 + a^2) b)] - 

    a Sqrt[b (2 + (-2 + a^2) b)] - 2 a^3 Sqrt[b (2 + (-2 + a^2) b)] + (
    a b^6 (-7 - 4 (-2 + a^2) b))/Sqrt[b^7 (2 + (-2 + a^2) b)] + (
    3 a b^4 (5 + 3 (-2 + a^2) b))/Sqrt[b^5 (2 + (-2 + a^2) b)])/(-1 + b - 
    a^2 b + a Sqrt[
     b (2 + (-2 + a^2) b)])^2 - (2 (1 - a^2 + (a - 2 a b + a^3 b)/Sqrt[
      b (2 + (-2 + a^2) b)]) (-1 + (-11 - a^2 + 2 a^4) b^2 + (8 - 
         3 a^2) b^3 + (-2 + a^2) b^4 - 
      b (-6 - 3 a^2 + a Sqrt[b (2 + (-2 + a^2) b)] + 
         2 a^3 Sqrt[b (2 + (-2 + a^2) b)]) - 
      a (Sqrt[b (2 + (-2 + a^2) b)] - 3 Sqrt[b^5 (2 + (-2 + a^2) b)] + Sqrt[

         b^7 (2 + (-2 + a^2) b)])))/(-1 + b - a^2 b + 
    a Sqrt[b (2 + (-2 + a^2) b)])^3 *)

And this, much better expression is what I got on the other computer, the Windows 7 one:


D[r1, b] // sf

(* (2 (-1 + b)^2 b (4 (-2 + 9 a^2 - 8 a^4 + 2 a^6) b^4 - 
     3 a Sqrt[b (2 + (-2 + a^2) b)] - 
     b (-8 - 11 a^2 + 10 a Sqrt[b (2 + (-2 + a^2) b)] + 
        10 a^3 Sqrt[b (2 + (-2 + a^2) b)]) - 

     b^2 (24 - 14 a^2 - 14 a^4 - 29 a Sqrt[b (2 + (-2 + a^2) b)] + 
        14 a^3 Sqrt[b (2 + (-2 + a^2) b)] + 
        4 a^5 Sqrt[b (2 + (-2 + a^2) b)]) - 
     b^3 (-24 + 61 a^2 - 18 a^4 - 4 a^6 + 16 a Sqrt[b (2 + (-2 + a^2) b)] - 
        24 a^3 Sqrt[b (2 + (-2 + a^2) b)] + 
        8 a^5 Sqrt[b (2 + (-2 + a^2) b)])))/(Sqrt[
   b (2 + (-2 + a^2) b)] (-a b + Sqrt[b (2 + (-2 + a^2) b)])^3 (-1 + b - 
     a^2 b + a Sqrt[b (2 + (-2 + a^2) b)])^2) *)

Can I find the reason for this and make it the same on both computers? If so, how to do this? I may have changed global preferences for Simplify on the Windows 7 computer, but don't remember if or how or what I did concerning that. This behavior occurs both in Mathematica 11.2 and Mathematica 11.1.1.





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...
Post a Comment
Read more