Skip to main content

How to export this PDF figure with a small size


I want to export a PDF figure with the following codes, but the size of the PDF is too big, about 1.5M. I hope the size can be around 100k. I have tried for a long time but can not find a good solution. Any help or suggestion will be highly appreciated!



\[Rho]2plus = {{0.2011205485336045077` + 
1.`*^-6 I, -0.017422322154311026` -
0.508770348467936524` I, -0.01627481119236278` -
0.009599125271231317` I,
0.00012377921551508936` -
0.0001037303194895626` I}, {-0.317422322154311026` +
0.008770348467936524` I, 0.5253584399150775` + 1.`*^-6 I,
0.1810835129135062` - 0.050379441418388037` I,
0.012122030783398718` -
0.00011053335415397864` I}, {-0.01627481119236278` +

0.009599125271231317` I,
0.4810835129135062` + 0.050379441418388037` I,
0.07251617971431137` + 1.`*^-6 I,
0.011027619410833644` +
0.00549701145732366` I}, {0.20012377921551508936` +
0.0001037303194895626` I,
0.012122030783398718` + 0.00011053335415397864` I,
0.011027619410833644` - 0.00549701145732366` I,
0.001004831837006529` + 1.`*^-6 I}};


\[Rho]2minus = {{0.005277185010322719` + 1.`*^-6 I,
0.0010040157957586214` +
0.04371079428674348` I, -0.09005650743684472643` -
0.046221573555130006` I, -0.003643884304307673` -
0.001085378855037156` I}, {0.2010040157957586214` -
0.24371079428674348` I,
0.0131515781501287` + 1.`*^-6 I, -0.1857896769310657` +
0.01114973388880884` I,
0.008915832323651186` +
0.03176372686431984` I}, {0.5005650743684472643` +

0.046221573555130006` I, -0.0857896769310657` -
0.01114973388880884` I,
0.07651833701845997` + 1.`*^-6 I, -0.0025963451307736015` -
0.034899274546212444` I}, {-0.003643884304307673` +
0.001085378855037156` I,
0.208915832323651186` -
0.23176372686431984` I, -0.0025963451307736015` +
0.034899274546212444` I, 0.005052899821088675` + 1.`*^-6 I}};




figplus=GraphicsRow[
DiscretePlot3D[#@\[Rho]2plus[[i, j]], {i, 1, 4}, {j, 1, 4},
BoxRatios -> {1., 1., .8}, ExtentSize -> 0.5,
PlotRange -> {{.5, 4.5}, {.5, 4.5}, {-.5, .526}},
ColorFunction -> (Blend[{Hue[2/3], Hue[0]}, #] &),
ExtentElementFunction -> "ProfileCube",
Ticks -> {{{1, "A"}, {2, "B"}, {3, "C"}, {4, "D"}}, {{1,
"E"}, {2, "F"}, {3, "G"}, {4, "H"}}, Automatic},
AxesEdge -> {{-1, -1}, {1, -1}, {1, 1}},

FillingStyle -> Opacity[1],
LabelStyle ->
Directive[FontSize -> 12, FontFamily -> "Helvetica"],
Boxed -> True] & /@ {Re, Im} , ImageSize -> 500 ];



figminus =GraphicsRow[DiscretePlot3D[#@\[Rho]2minus[[i, j]], {i, 1, 4}, {j, 1, 4},
BoxRatios -> {1., 1., .8}, ExtentSize -> 0.5,
PlotRange -> {{.5, 4.5}, {.5, 4.5}, {-.5, .523}},

ColorFunction -> (Blend[{Hue[2/3], Hue[0]}, #] &),
ExtentElementFunction -> "ProfileCube",
Ticks -> {{{1, "A"}, {2, "B"}, {3, "C"}, {4, "D"}}, {{1,
"E"}, {2, "F"}, {3, "G"}, {4, "H"}}, Automatic},
AxesEdge -> {{-1, -1}, {1, -1}, {1, 1}},
FillingStyle -> Opacity[1],
LabelStyle ->
Directive[FontSize -> 12, FontFamily -> "Helvetica"],
Boxed -> True] & /@ {Re, Im} , ImageSize -> 500 ];
gg = Grid[{{figminus}, {figplus}}, Spacings -> {0, 0}]

Export["Fig8.pdf", gg, ImageResolution -> 600]

enter image description here




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...