Skip to main content

differential equations - Using WhenEvent to Change the Sign of a Constant


I am attempting to change the sign of a constant when a certain condition is met during a numerical integration. Here is the code:


μk = 0.3; g = 9.81; R = 1; ti = 0; m = 0.3;

EOM = -μk (R θ'[t]^2 + g Sin[θ[t]]) +
g Cos[θ[t]] == R θ''[t];
IC1 = θ'[0] == 0; IC2 = θ[0] == 0;


sol = NDSolve[{EOM, IC1, IC2,
WhenEvent[θ'[t] == 0, {μk = -μk; tf = t;
"RestartIntegration"}]}, θ[t], {t, ti, ∞}];

θ = θ[t] /. sol;
θd = D[θ[t] /. sol, t];
Plot[{θ, θd}, {t, ti, tf}]

The problem lies in the fact that it is not dissipating as it should. θ should start to approach Pi/2. Instead it oscillates on to Infinity.



Note: I discovered that I cannot simply use Sign[θ'[t]] since the value is crossing zero. A zero value is undesirable in my case.


Slider System


Here is an image of the system being modeled.



Answer



The code has three issues. First, μk cannot be changed during the computation unless it is designated by DiscreteVariables. Second, the list of actions to be taken by WhenEvent needs to be separated by commas, not semicolons. Third, the upper limit of integration cannot be infinity. With these changes, the code becomes


g = 9.81; R = 1; ti = 0; m = 0.3;

EOM = -μk [t] (R θ'[t]^2 + g Sin[θ[t]]) + g Cos[θ[t]] == R θ''[t];
IC1 = θ'[0] == 0; IC2 = θ[0] == 0;


sol = NDSolve[{EOM, IC1, IC2, μk [0] == 0.3,
WhenEvent[θ'[t] == 0, {μk[t] -> -μk[t], tf = t, "RestartIntegration"}]},
{θ[t], θ'[t], μk[t]}, {t, ti, 10}, DiscreteVariables -> μk];

tmax = Flatten[θ[t] /. sol /. t -> "Domain"] // Last;
Plot[Evaluate[{θ[t], θ'[t], μk[t]} /. sol], {t, ti, tmax}, ImageSize -> Large]

enter image description here


Note that the computation terminates with a NDSolve::ndsz error. Basically, the computation has become unstable. Method -> "StiffnessSwitching" does not help. Incidentally, "RestartIntegration" has no substantive effect in this computation and can be omitted.


Improved Solution



Based on additional information provided by the OP in comments below and in the question itself, a better approach is


g = 981/100; R = 1; ti = 0; m = 3/10; μ = 3/10;

EOM = -μ Sign[θ'[t]] (R θ'[t]^2 + g Sin[θ[t]]) + g Cos[θ[t]] == R θ''[t];
IC1 = θ'[0] == 0; IC2 = θ[0] == 0;

sol = NDSolve[{EOM, IC1, IC2}, {θ[t], θ'[t]}, {t, ti, 10}, WorkingPrecision -> 30];

Plot[Evaluate[{θ[t], θ'[t], μ Sign[θ'[t]]} /. sol], {t, ti, tmax}, ImageSize -> Large]


enter image description here


The two solutions are identical until θ'[t] == 0 at t == 2.062520756856687159564857914. In the earlier computation, WhenEvent causes μk to reverse sign, even though θ'[t] does not, thereby introducing negative friction. I have tried numerous WhenEvent options, as well as WorkingPrecision as high as 60 to resolve this issue, but without success. In conclusion, only the second solution is credible physically.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...