Skip to main content

plotting - Piecewise Integration


I am trying to integrate a piecewise defined function twice. It represents the acceleration of a projectile. I am obtaining it's position as a function of time if it starts from rest at the ground, accelerates upward with a constant acceleration of 2.25 and then falls freely after 21.6 seconds. The code I am using to represent the scenario,


a[t_] := Piecewise[{{2.25, t < 21.6}, {-9.8, t > 21.60}}]
v[t_] := Integrate[a[s], {s, 0, t}]

x[t_] := Integrate[v[x], {x, 0, t}]
Plot[a[t], {t, 0, 30}]
Plot[v[t], {t, 0, 30}]
Plot[x[t], {t, 0, 30}]

Sometimes it will give me all three graphs, but usually it will just give me the first two, without the third. It then tells me,



Integrate::pwrl: Unable to prove that integration limits {0,x} are real. Adding assumptions may help. >>



I noticed that if I usually let Mathematica run long enough it will eventually spit out the last graph. I am just curious what is going on. I imagine it has something to do with an integration constant and Mathematica not able to tell what interval the piecewise function is on, but I am not quite sure if I can pint it down.



Any ideas? Or is there a better way to do what I am trying to do?



Answer



In this case using Set, so that the integrals are evaluated at the time that v and x are defined, instead of SetDelayed helps with the speed, assumming t has no value. If t has a value, one can use Block as shown below to temporarily block the value while a, v, and x are defined. The increase in speed is due to the ability of Mathematica to evaluate the integrals symbolically in the OP's case. The two integrals are evaluated only once, at the time the functions are defined. Using SetDelayed means the integrals will be recalculated at each value of t, so that the integral is done many times.


One still needs to add an assumption that t is real in the integral to prevent the error Integrate::pwrl.


Clear[a, v, x];
Block[{t},
a[t_] = Piecewise[{{2.25, t < 21.6}, {-9.8, t > 21.60}}];
v[t_] = Integrate[a[s], {s, 0, t}, Assumptions -> t \[Element] Reals];
x[t_] = Integrate[v[x], {x, 0, t}, Assumptions -> t \[Element] Reals];
];

Plot[a[t], {t, 0, 30}]
Plot[v[t], {t, 0, 30}]
Plot[x[t], {t, 0, 30}, Exclusions -> None]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...