Skip to main content

plotting - Piecewise Integration


I am trying to integrate a piecewise defined function twice. It represents the acceleration of a projectile. I am obtaining it's position as a function of time if it starts from rest at the ground, accelerates upward with a constant acceleration of 2.25 and then falls freely after 21.6 seconds. The code I am using to represent the scenario,


a[t_] := Piecewise[{{2.25, t < 21.6}, {-9.8, t > 21.60}}]
v[t_] := Integrate[a[s], {s, 0, t}]

x[t_] := Integrate[v[x], {x, 0, t}]
Plot[a[t], {t, 0, 30}]
Plot[v[t], {t, 0, 30}]
Plot[x[t], {t, 0, 30}]

Sometimes it will give me all three graphs, but usually it will just give me the first two, without the third. It then tells me,



Integrate::pwrl: Unable to prove that integration limits {0,x} are real. Adding assumptions may help. >>



I noticed that if I usually let Mathematica run long enough it will eventually spit out the last graph. I am just curious what is going on. I imagine it has something to do with an integration constant and Mathematica not able to tell what interval the piecewise function is on, but I am not quite sure if I can pint it down.



Any ideas? Or is there a better way to do what I am trying to do?



Answer



In this case using Set, so that the integrals are evaluated at the time that v and x are defined, instead of SetDelayed helps with the speed, assumming t has no value. If t has a value, one can use Block as shown below to temporarily block the value while a, v, and x are defined. The increase in speed is due to the ability of Mathematica to evaluate the integrals symbolically in the OP's case. The two integrals are evaluated only once, at the time the functions are defined. Using SetDelayed means the integrals will be recalculated at each value of t, so that the integral is done many times.


One still needs to add an assumption that t is real in the integral to prevent the error Integrate::pwrl.


Clear[a, v, x];
Block[{t},
  a[t_] = Piecewise[{{2.25, t < 21.6}, {-9.8, t > 21.60}}];
  v[t_] = Integrate[a[s], {s, 0, t}, Assumptions -> t \[Element] Reals];
  x[t_] = Integrate[v[x], {x, 0, t}, Assumptions -> t \[Element] Reals];
 ];

Plot[a[t], {t, 0, 30}]
Plot[v[t], {t, 0, 30}]
Plot[x[t], {t, 0, 30}, Exclusions -> None]

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...
Post a Comment
Read more