Skip to main content

graphics - What is wrong with triangle PlotMarkers in v.10.0.0?



Bug introduced in 10.0.0 and fixed in 10.0.1



In Mathematica 10.0.0 we have built-in graphical triangle PlotMarkers. Let us look closer on them:


ListLinePlot[{{Missing[]}, {{0, 0}}}, PlotTheme -> "Monochrome", 
 ImageSize -> 20, Ticks -> False, AxesOrigin -> {0, 0}, 
 BaseStyle -> {Magnification -> 10, Thickness -> Tiny}]

ListLinePlot[{{Missing[]}, {{0, 0}}}, 
 PlotTheme -> {"OpenMarkersThick", "LargeLabels"}, ImageSize -> 20, 
 Ticks -> False, AxesOrigin -> {0, 0}, 

 BaseStyle -> {Magnification -> 10, Thickness -> Tiny}]


plot1


plot2



It is clear that there is something wrong with the triangles. Is this functionality implemented correctly?



Answer



The triangle plot markers


It is natural to expect that the triangle marker is placed in such a way that its center of mass (center of circumcircle) coincides with the point it marks. That's how it is implemented in all major scientific plotting software, for example Origin:



plot markers in Origin 7.5


Some time ago I published my own implementation of triangle-based plot markers. Let us check how the new markers are implemented:


ListLinePlot[{{Missing[]}, {{0, 0}}}, PlotTheme -> "Monochrome", 
 ImageSize -> 10, Ticks -> False, AxesOrigin -> {0, 0}, 
 BaseStyle -> {Magnification -> 10, Thickness -> Tiny}]
%[[1, 2, 2, 2, -1]] // InputForm


screenshot


GeometricTransformation[Inset[Graphics[{<...>

      Line[{Offset[{0., 2.7625}], 
        Offset[{-2.7625, -2.022290355909023}], 
        Offset[{2.7625, -2.022290355909023}], 
        Offset[{0., 2.7625}]}]}], {0., 0.}],
     {{{0., 0.}}, {{0., 0.}}}]

Apart of the fact that the curve is not closed, the triangle is positioned in a strange way: the "center" is placed on the


2.022290355909023/(2.7625 + 2.022290355909023)



0.4226497308103742



part of the height of the triangle instead of expected 1/3 (the center of circumcircle). So current implementation is clearly wrong and leads to producing incorrect plots. Here is an example of correct implementation:


Graphics[{AbsoluteThickness[1], JoinedCurve[
   Line[{Offset[{0, 2}], Offset[{Sqrt[3], -1}], 
     Offset[{-Sqrt[3], -1}]}], CurveClosed -> True]},
 ImageSize -> 10, Axes -> True, Ticks -> False, AxesOrigin -> {0, 0}, 
 BaseStyle -> {Magnification -> 10, Thickness -> Tiny}]



screenshot



The following is correct implementation of both empty and filled triangle plot markers of strictly identical sizes with consistent explicit control over their sizes and thickness:


emptyUpTriangle = 
  Graphics[{AbsoluteThickness[absoluteThickness], 
    JoinedCurve[Line[{Offset[size {0, 2}], Offset[size {Sqrt[3], -1}], 
       Offset[size {-Sqrt[3], -1}]}], CurveClosed -> True]}, 
   AlignmentPoint -> {0, 0}];
filledUpTriangle = 
  Graphics[{Triangle[{Offset[size {0, 2} + absoluteThickness {0, 1}], 

      Offset[size {Sqrt[3], -1} + absoluteThickness {Sqrt[3/4], -1/2}], 
      Offset[size {-Sqrt[3], -1} + absoluteThickness {-Sqrt[3/4], -1/2}]}]}, 
   AlignmentPoint -> {0, 0}];
{emptyLeftTriangle, filledLeftTriangle, emptyDownTriangle, 
   filledDownTriangle, emptyRightTriangle, filledRightTriangle} = 
  Flatten[{emptyUpTriangle, filledUpTriangle} /. {x_?NumericQ, y_?NumericQ} :> 
       RotationTransform[#][{x, y}] & /@ {Pi/2, Pi/3, -Pi/2}];

SeedRandom[12]
ListLinePlot[Accumulate /@ RandomReal[3, {8, 10}] Range[8], 

 PlotMarkers -> {emptyUpTriangle, filledUpTriangle, emptyLeftTriangle,
    filledLeftTriangle, emptyDownTriangle, filledDownTriangle, 
   emptyRightTriangle, filledRightTriangle}, AspectRatio -> 1]

plot


And here is an extended version which includes open triangles with white filling:


size = 4; absoluteThickness = 2;

triangle[Up, Empty] = 
  Graphics[{AbsoluteThickness[absoluteThickness], 

    JoinedCurve[Line[{Offset[size {0, 2}], Offset[size {Sqrt[3], -1}], 
       Offset[size {-Sqrt[3], -1}]}], CurveClosed -> True]}, 
   AlignmentPoint -> {0, 0}];
triangle[Up, Filled] = 
  Graphics[{Triangle[{Offset[size {0, 2} + absoluteThickness {0, 1}], 
      Offset[size {Sqrt[3], -1} + absoluteThickness {Sqrt[3/4], -1/2}], 
      Offset[size {-Sqrt[3], -1} + absoluteThickness {-Sqrt[3/4], -1/2}]}]}, 
   AlignmentPoint -> {0, 0}];
triangle[Up, Open] = 
  Graphics[{{White, Triangle[{Offset[size {0, 2}], Offset[size {Sqrt[3], -1}], 

       Offset[size {-Sqrt[3], -1}]}]}, {AbsoluteThickness[absoluteThickness], 
     JoinedCurve[Line[{Offset[size {0, 2}], Offset[size {Sqrt[3], -1}], 
        Offset[size {-Sqrt[3], -1}]}], CurveClosed -> True]}}, 
   AlignmentPoint -> {0, 0}];
triangle[dir_: {Up, Right, Down, Left}, fill_: {Empty, Filled, Open}] := 
 triangle[Up, fill] /. {x_?NumericQ, y_?NumericQ} :> 
   RotationTransform[dir /. {Right -> -Pi/2, Down -> Pi/3, Left -> Pi/2}][{x, y}]

pl = ListPlot[Flatten[Table[{{n, y}}, {y, Range[2]}, {n, 6}], 1], 
  PlotMarkers -> 

   Flatten@Table[triangle[dir, fill], 
            {dir, {Up, Right, Down, Left}}, {fill, {Empty, Filled, Open}}], 
            GridLines -> {Range[6], Range[2]}, 
  PlotRange -> {{0, 7}, {0, 3}}, Axes -> False, Frame -> True]

plot2



Other plot markers


Not only triangle plot markers have problems:


ListLinePlot[{{#, 0}} & /@ Range[5], PlotTheme -> "Monochrome", 

 ImageSize -> 70, Ticks -> False, Axes -> False, Frame -> True, 
 BaseStyle -> {Magnification -> 15, Thickness -> Tiny}, 
 PlotRange -> {{0.5, 5.5}, All}, AspectRatio -> 1/10, 
 FrameTicks -> None, BaselinePosition -> Center, 
 GridLines -> {Range[5], {0}}, 
 GridLinesStyle -> Directive[{Dashing[None], Gray}], 
 Method -> {"GridLinesInFront" -> True}]
Cases[%, g_Graphics :> 
  Show[g, ImageSize -> 8, BaseStyle -> {Magnification -> 16}, 
   BaselinePosition -> Center], Infinity]

Cases[%[[4]], _Line, Infinity]


screenshot


{Line[{Offset[{-2.5, -2.5}],   Offset[{2.125, -2.125}], 
       Offset[{2.125, 2.125}], Offset[{-2.125, 2.125}], 
       Offset[{-2.125, -2.125}]}]}

As one can see, the square starts from the point {-2.5, -2.5} and ends in {-2.125, -2.125}!


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.
Post a Comment
Read more