Skip to main content

graphics - What is wrong with triangle PlotMarkers in v.10.0.0?



Bug introduced in 10.0.0 and fixed in 10.0.1




In Mathematica 10.0.0 we have built-in graphical triangle PlotMarkers. Let us look closer on them:


ListLinePlot[{{Missing[]}, {{0, 0}}}, PlotTheme -> "Monochrome", 
ImageSize -> 20, Ticks -> False, AxesOrigin -> {0, 0},
BaseStyle -> {Magnification -> 10, Thickness -> Tiny}]

ListLinePlot[{{Missing[]}, {{0, 0}}},
PlotTheme -> {"OpenMarkersThick", "LargeLabels"}, ImageSize -> 20,
Ticks -> False, AxesOrigin -> {0, 0},

BaseStyle -> {Magnification -> 10, Thickness -> Tiny}]


plot1


plot2



It is clear that there is something wrong with the triangles. Is this functionality implemented correctly?



Answer



The triangle plot markers


It is natural to expect that the triangle marker is placed in such a way that its center of mass (center of circumcircle) coincides with the point it marks. That's how it is implemented in all major scientific plotting software, for example Origin:



plot markers in Origin 7.5


Some time ago I published my own implementation of triangle-based plot markers. Let us check how the new markers are implemented:


ListLinePlot[{{Missing[]}, {{0, 0}}}, PlotTheme -> "Monochrome", 
ImageSize -> 10, Ticks -> False, AxesOrigin -> {0, 0},
BaseStyle -> {Magnification -> 10, Thickness -> Tiny}]
%[[1, 2, 2, 2, -1]] // InputForm


screenshot


GeometricTransformation[Inset[Graphics[{<...>

Line[{Offset[{0., 2.7625}],
Offset[{-2.7625, -2.022290355909023}],
Offset[{2.7625, -2.022290355909023}],
Offset[{0., 2.7625}]}]}], {0., 0.}],
{{{0., 0.}}, {{0., 0.}}}]

Apart of the fact that the curve is not closed, the triangle is positioned in a strange way: the "center" is placed on the


2.022290355909023/(2.7625 + 2.022290355909023)



0.4226497308103742



part of the height of the triangle instead of expected 1/3 (the center of circumcircle). So current implementation is clearly wrong and leads to producing incorrect plots. Here is an example of correct implementation:


Graphics[{AbsoluteThickness[1], JoinedCurve[
Line[{Offset[{0, 2}], Offset[{Sqrt[3], -1}],
Offset[{-Sqrt[3], -1}]}], CurveClosed -> True]},
ImageSize -> 10, Axes -> True, Ticks -> False, AxesOrigin -> {0, 0},
BaseStyle -> {Magnification -> 10, Thickness -> Tiny}]



screenshot



The following is correct implementation of both empty and filled triangle plot markers of strictly identical sizes with consistent explicit control over their sizes and thickness:


emptyUpTriangle = 
Graphics[{AbsoluteThickness[absoluteThickness],
JoinedCurve[Line[{Offset[size {0, 2}], Offset[size {Sqrt[3], -1}],
Offset[size {-Sqrt[3], -1}]}], CurveClosed -> True]},
AlignmentPoint -> {0, 0}];
filledUpTriangle =
Graphics[{Triangle[{Offset[size {0, 2} + absoluteThickness {0, 1}],

Offset[size {Sqrt[3], -1} + absoluteThickness {Sqrt[3/4], -1/2}],
Offset[size {-Sqrt[3], -1} + absoluteThickness {-Sqrt[3/4], -1/2}]}]},
AlignmentPoint -> {0, 0}];
{emptyLeftTriangle, filledLeftTriangle, emptyDownTriangle,
filledDownTriangle, emptyRightTriangle, filledRightTriangle} =
Flatten[{emptyUpTriangle, filledUpTriangle} /. {x_?NumericQ, y_?NumericQ} :>
RotationTransform[#][{x, y}] & /@ {Pi/2, Pi/3, -Pi/2}];

SeedRandom[12]
ListLinePlot[Accumulate /@ RandomReal[3, {8, 10}] Range[8],

PlotMarkers -> {emptyUpTriangle, filledUpTriangle, emptyLeftTriangle,
filledLeftTriangle, emptyDownTriangle, filledDownTriangle,
emptyRightTriangle, filledRightTriangle}, AspectRatio -> 1]

plot


And here is an extended version which includes open triangles with white filling:


size = 4; absoluteThickness = 2;

triangle[Up, Empty] =
Graphics[{AbsoluteThickness[absoluteThickness],

JoinedCurve[Line[{Offset[size {0, 2}], Offset[size {Sqrt[3], -1}],
Offset[size {-Sqrt[3], -1}]}], CurveClosed -> True]},
AlignmentPoint -> {0, 0}];
triangle[Up, Filled] =
Graphics[{Triangle[{Offset[size {0, 2} + absoluteThickness {0, 1}],
Offset[size {Sqrt[3], -1} + absoluteThickness {Sqrt[3/4], -1/2}],
Offset[size {-Sqrt[3], -1} + absoluteThickness {-Sqrt[3/4], -1/2}]}]},
AlignmentPoint -> {0, 0}];
triangle[Up, Open] =
Graphics[{{White, Triangle[{Offset[size {0, 2}], Offset[size {Sqrt[3], -1}],

Offset[size {-Sqrt[3], -1}]}]}, {AbsoluteThickness[absoluteThickness],
JoinedCurve[Line[{Offset[size {0, 2}], Offset[size {Sqrt[3], -1}],
Offset[size {-Sqrt[3], -1}]}], CurveClosed -> True]}},
AlignmentPoint -> {0, 0}];
triangle[dir_: {Up, Right, Down, Left}, fill_: {Empty, Filled, Open}] :=
triangle[Up, fill] /. {x_?NumericQ, y_?NumericQ} :>
RotationTransform[dir /. {Right -> -Pi/2, Down -> Pi/3, Left -> Pi/2}][{x, y}]

pl = ListPlot[Flatten[Table[{{n, y}}, {y, Range[2]}, {n, 6}], 1],
PlotMarkers ->

Flatten@Table[triangle[dir, fill],
{dir, {Up, Right, Down, Left}}, {fill, {Empty, Filled, Open}}],
GridLines -> {Range[6], Range[2]},
PlotRange -> {{0, 7}, {0, 3}}, Axes -> False, Frame -> True]

plot2




Other plot markers


Not only triangle plot markers have problems:


ListLinePlot[{{#, 0}} & /@ Range[5], PlotTheme -> "Monochrome", 

ImageSize -> 70, Ticks -> False, Axes -> False, Frame -> True,
BaseStyle -> {Magnification -> 15, Thickness -> Tiny},
PlotRange -> {{0.5, 5.5}, All}, AspectRatio -> 1/10,
FrameTicks -> None, BaselinePosition -> Center,
GridLines -> {Range[5], {0}},
GridLinesStyle -> Directive[{Dashing[None], Gray}],
Method -> {"GridLinesInFront" -> True}]
Cases[%, g_Graphics :>
Show[g, ImageSize -> 8, BaseStyle -> {Magnification -> 16},
BaselinePosition -> Center], Infinity]

Cases[%[[4]], _Line, Infinity]


screenshot


{Line[{Offset[{-2.5, -2.5}],   Offset[{2.125, -2.125}], 
Offset[{2.125, 2.125}], Offset[{-2.125, 2.125}],
Offset[{-2.125, -2.125}]}]}

As one can see, the square starts from the point {-2.5, -2.5} and ends in {-2.125, -2.125}!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...