Skip to main content

mathlink or wstp - How to implement LinkLaunch-like functionality with timeout?


tl;dr: What is the best way (and correct sequence of operations) to connect two programs using MathLink while anticipating failures / timeouts?



Launch program and connect, with timeout


I have a program P that I want to connect to a Mathematica kernel K through MathLink/WSTP. P may take a long time to launch, and it may also fail completely (depending on the computer where it is being run).



The expected behaviour is this:



  • K starts up P, and waits for a connection.

  • If P does not connect back within time t, K should fail gracefully and report an error.

  • If P took longer to start than K expected, and at that point it can no longer connect, it should also fail gracefully.

  • They should not leave any broken links behind if the connection process fails. Preferably, no shared memory link names should become unusable in case of failure.


K will use Wolfram Language functions. P will use the C MathLink API.


I believe I should rely on LinkReadyQ for the timeout (see its second argument), but it is not clear what is the correct sequence of operations to perform if robustness is critical.


It is also not clear to me which of K and P should use the Connect and Listen link modes (I think K should use Listen and P should use Connect).




Connect two already running programs


I would also like to implement a second mode of operation for K and P:


Suppose that both K and P are already running. I would like to implement a user-friendly method to connect them together. Ideally, the user would issue a command both in K and P:


connectToP[] (* Issued in K. *)

connectToK[] (* Issued in P.  P is not Mathematica, but for this example, it's okay to pretend it is. *)

Preferably, the order in which these commands are issued should not matter, and the connection would be set up automatically. This is for the sake of user-friendliness. Again, it is preferable to make the commands abortable without bad side effects (or to allow them to time out).


Use case: Connect Mathematica with another scientific computing system. Suppose that you have already done some work in the other system and have a workspace full of variables. You realize that you want to transfer some of these to Mathematica without having to restart the system.



The key question here is if it is possible to implement a robust connection method which does not care about the order in which the commands are issued. Alternatively, there could be a user-friendly error message (and no bad side effects, such as broken links) when the commands are issued in the wrong order.



This is related to Why does LinkRead block when LinkReadyQ returns True?.




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...
Post a Comment
Read more

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?
Post a Comment
Read more

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...
Post a Comment
Read more