Skip to main content

programming - A pre-parsed HoldForm


HoldForm holds an expression's parsed form not its actual "inputted form" e.g.


 SetAttributes[AttemptedRespect, HoldAll];

AttemptedRespect[x_] := ExpressionCell[HoldForm@x, "Input"]

(assoc = <|f@x -> (x // g)|>) // AttemptedRespect


assoc = Association[f[x] -> g[x]]



where the held short forms/notation of Association/f/g are no longer respected.


To instigate respect:


 FleetingRespect[expr_] :=

(Unprotect@Association;
Format[Association[x__]] := <|x|>;
Format[f[x_]] := Prefix[f@x];
Format[g[x_]] := Postfix[x // g];
ExpressionCell[HoldForm@expr, "Input"])

and:


(assoc = <|f@x -> (x // g)|>) // FleetingRespect



assoc = <|f@x -> (x // g)|>



which is, of course, indeed fleeting:


(assoc = Association[(x // f) -> (g@x)]) // FleetingRespect


assoc = <|f@x -> (x // g)|>



Is there a way to cajole HoldForm into more faithfully respecting what she wraps?


In other words - a function PermanentRespect such that:



(assoc = <|f@x -> (x // g)|>) // PermanentRespect


assoc = <|f@x -> (x // g)|>



and


(assoc = Association[(x // f) -> (g@x)]) // PermanentRespect


assoc = Association[(x // f) -> (g@x)]




Yoh - Respect.


Answer: The final effort in Simon Rochester's answer almost creates a pre-parsed HoldForm (without touching $PreRead) and it certainly meets the use-case requirements that originally motivated the question. Essentially I wanted to programmatically generate the "natural input shortforms" with normal output form (without using any frontend manipulations).


MakeExpression[
RowBox@{"hf", "[", expr_, "]"} |
RowBox@{"hf", "@", expr_} |
RowBox@{expr_, "//", "hf"}, StandardForm] := HoldComplete@RawBoxes@expr;

SetAttributes[IOCells, HoldAll];


IOCells[expr_] := Grid[{
{ExpressionCell[expr, "Input", ShowStringCharacters -> True]},
{ExpressionCell[ToExpression@First@expr, "Output"]}},
Frame -> True,
Alignment -> Left,
Background -> {None, {1 -> GrayLevel[.9], 2 -> White}}];

and now both examples


Grid[{
{hf[assoc = <|f@x -> (x // g)|>],

hf[assoc = Association[(x // f) -> (g@x)]]}
}] // (Map[IOCells, #, {3}] &)

enter image description here


preserve input forms, respectively.



Answer



I think $PreRead may be your only hope (but see below). You can set it up with


$PreRead = (# /. 
RowBox@{"PermanentRespect", "[", expr_, "]"} |
RowBox@{"PermanentRespect", "@", expr_} |

RowBox@{expr_, "//", "PermanentRespect"} :>
RowBox@{"RawBoxes", "[", MakeBoxes@expr, "]"}
) &;

LoseRespect[expr_] := expr /. RawBoxes -> ToExpression

Now you can do


(assoc = <|f@x -> (x // g)|>) // PermanentRespect



(assoc = <|f@x -> (x // g)|>)



or


expr = PermanentRespect[(assoc = <|f@x -> (x // g)|>)]


(assoc = <|f@x -> (x // g)|>)



The expression hasn't been evaluated:


assoc



assoc



Evaluate it with LoseRespect:


LoseRespect[expr]


<|f[x] -> g[x]|>






Despite what I said above, I think $PreRead may not be your only hope. Here's another solution that uses NotebookRead to get the box representation of the currently evaluating cell. It then looks through those boxes to find the box representation of the call to itself, and returns that wrapped in RawBoxes.


(First clear $PreRead with $PreRead =. if the definition above is still active.)


Define PermanentRespect:


SetAttributes[PermanentRespect, HoldAll]

PermanentRespect[expr_] :=
First@Cases[
NotebookRead[EvaluationCell[]],
RowBox@{"PermanentRespect", "[", boxes_, "]"} |

RowBox@{"PermanentRespect", "@", boxes_} |
RowBox@{boxes_, "//", "PermanentRespect"} /;
MakeExpression[boxes, StandardForm] == HoldComplete[expr] :> RawBoxes[boxes],
Infinity
]

Now PermanentRespect gives the same results as obtained above.




I'm getting more wrong by the minute about $PreRead -- here's a third solution that employs a custom definition for MakeExpression, which is used whenever boxes are converted to expressions by the front end:


ClearAll[PermanentRespect]


MakeExpression[
RowBox@{"PermanentRespect", "[", expr_, "]"} |
RowBox@{"PermanentRespect", "@", expr_} |
RowBox@{expr_, "//", "PermanentRespect"},
StandardForm
] := HoldComplete@RawBoxes@expr

This also gives the same results as above.





Also, any of the above methods can be used with .m package files, if the package file is evaluated as a notebook instead of using Get. You can define


myGet[file_] := Module[{obj},
obj = NotebookOpen[file, Visible -> False];
NotebookEvaluate[obj];
NotebookClose[obj]
]

Then if the package file is loaded with myGet["package.m"], the PermanentRespect function calls inside the package will behave as above.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....