Skip to main content

import - Difficulties with Importing PDFs in Mathematica


I am trying to import a group of PDFs that I have downloaded (it is in the realm of 1,000+). They are a group of doctoral dissertations that I'm trying to automatically extract bibliographic information from. They open perfectly in Preview and Adobe Acrobat Reader. Unfortunately, when I go to Import[] them, I receive the following errors like so:


Import["1997-01.pdf","Elements"]

Import::general: Expected cross reference table >>
Import::general: Expected cross reference table >>
Import::general: Could not find document trailer >>
General::stop: Further output of Import::general will be suppressed during this calculation. >>


I have never encountered this with Elements before, which is normally my first step in figuring out how to tackle a file. The same holds for Plaintext, etc. If I Import["1997-01.pdf","Text"] it generates a file akin to this:


%PDF-1.2
%BHIL-SC:0014503155,00391,00004,00008,00399,00790,00004,00004,00009,00400,00791,00004,00004,00010,00401,00792,00004 ... etc. etc.

The file itself is downloaded from an online repository, however, but is of high quality.


enter image description here


My end goal is to try TextRecognize[] on it, but I cannot even get to that stage. Does Mathematica offer any workarounds for PDFs like this? FWIW, the PDF claims that I have full permissions to edit, alter, etc., but there is no built-in text layer.


--- Edited to Clarify ---


The PDF is version 1.2. It is an image layer, not a text layer. Hope that this helps!




Answer



If it's really scanned images, then you could try this:


pages = Import["yourfile.pdf", {"PDF", "Images"}]

Otherwise, I'd suggest running the file through ghostscript or another distiller to clean up the potentially malformed PDF code first. The command would look like this:


gs -dSAFER -dBATCH -dNOPAUSE -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -sOutputFile=newfile.pdf badfile.pdf

Edit


Since you mentioned that you're on Mac OS X and also appear to be able to view the PDF file in Preview.app, there is an even simpler way:


If you're on Lion: Open the PDF in Preview, and export it as multipage TIFF. This can be done under the File > Export menu. The resulting file can be imported in Mathematica and yields a list of images.



Another possible approach that works for all OS X versions is to open the PDF in Preview and print it to a file. With that method, you could also select only the pages you really need by highlighting them in the Thumbnail view, and then choosing File > Print Selected Pages.... The PDF-printed file would hopefully have been processed to get rid of the errors.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...
Post a Comment
Read more