Skip to main content

graphics - create an (almost) hexagonal mesh on an ellipsoid



EDIT I edited the question in order to take into @Kuba's comment.


I want to create this figure with Mathematica (in particular an almost hexagonal mesh on an ellipsoid; thanks to @Kuba I know this is not 100% possible).


enter image description here


I use the function hexTile defined by @R.M. as his reply in 39879.


hexTile[n_, m_] := 
 With[{hex = Polygon[Table[{Cos[2 Pi k/6] + #, Sin[2 Pi k/6] + #2},
         {k, 6}]] &},       
  Table[hex[3 i + 3 ((-1)^j + 1)/4, Sqrt[3]/2 j], {i, n}, {j, m}] /. 
               {x_?NumericQ, y_?NumericQ} :> 
    2 \[Pi] {x/(3 m), 2 y/(n Sqrt[3])}]


E.g.


ht = With[{ell = {7 Cos[#1] Sin[#2], 5 Sin[#1] Sin[#2], 3 Cos[#2]} &},
   Graphics3D[
   hexTile[20, 20] /. Polygon[l_List] :> Polygon[ell @@@ l], 
   Boxed -> False]]

enter image description here


How can we modify the function so that the distribution of hexagons and pentagons resembles closely that of the first image?


Thanks.




Answer



If we compute the dual polyhedron of an appropriate triangularization of a surface we can get another polygonal mesh. This is pretty much the same as Kuba's approach except the code below computes the dual polyhedron more efficiently.


The basic function iDual computes the dual of a polyhedron given by a list of coordinates and lists of faces (by the indices of their vertices in the coordinate list). (Technically, the function assumes some approximate regularity of the polyhedron and that it can be considered centered at the origin. The mean of the vertices of a face serve as the "midpoint" of the face and form the vertices of the dual. Polyhedra with folds in them are probably not going to work.) The user-level function dual translates graphics and regions into input for iDual. While there is combinatorial data for determining the ordering of vertices about a face of the dual, doing it numerically with sortvertices is both easier and faster.


ClearAll[dual, iDual, sortvertices];

sortvertices[coords_, normal_, face_] :=
  With[{proj = DeleteCases[
       Orthogonalize[
        Join[{normal}, N@IdentityMatrix[3]]
        ], {0., 0., 0.}][[2 ;; 3]]},

   SortBy[face, ArcTan @@ (proj.coords[[#]]) &]
   ];

iDual[coords_?MatrixQ, faces : {{__Integer} ..}] := 
  With[{nvertices = Max@faces, nfaces = Length@faces},
   With[{mat = SparseArray@ Flatten@Table[{v, f} -> 1, {f, nfaces}, {v, faces[[f]]}],
     dualcoords = Mean[coords[[#]]] & /@ faces},
    With[{dualfaces = mat["AdjacencyLists"]},
     Graphics3D@ GraphicsComplex[
       dualcoords,

       Polygon[
        Table[
         sortvertices[dualcoords, coords[[v]], dualfaces[[v]]],
         {v, Length@dualfaces}]]
       ]
     ]]];

(* user-level functions *)
dual[polyhedron : Graphics3D@GraphicsComplex[coords_, Polygon[faces_]]] := 
  iDual[coords, faces];

dual[polyhedron_?MeshRegionQ /; 
    RegionDimension[polyhedron] == 2 && RegionEmbeddingDimension[polyhedron] == 3] := 
  iDual[MeshCoordinates[polyhedron], MeshCells[polyhedron, 2] /. Polygon -> Sequence];
dual[polyhedron_?BoundaryMeshRegionQ /; RegionDimension[polyhedron] == 3] := 
  iDual[MeshCoordinates[polyhedron], MeshCells[polyhedron, 2] /. Polygon -> Sequence];

Here is Kuba's example, with the dual vertices projected back onto the ellipsoid:


dual@DiscretizeRegion[Sphere[], MaxCellMeasure -> .02] /. 
 GraphicsComplex[pts_, stuff___] :> 
  GraphicsComplex[(Normalize /@ pts).DiagonalMatrix[{1, 2, 3}], stuff]


Mathematica graphics


Note region functions do not always produce an appropriate triangularization:


dual@ DiscretizeRegion[Sphere[]]
dual@ DiscretizeRegion[Sphere[], MaxCellMeasure -> {"Area" -> 0.01}]

Mathematica graphics Mathematica graphics


% /. GraphicsComplex[pts_, stuff___] :> 
  GraphicsComplex[(Normalize /@ pts).DiagonalMatrix[{1, 2, 3}], stuff]


Mathematica graphics


It seems impossible to use region functions directly on Ellipsoid:


dual@ BoundaryDiscretizeRegion[Ellipsoid[{0, 0, 0}, {1, 2, 3}], MaxCellMeasure -> .5]
dual@ BoundaryDiscretizeRegion[Ellipsoid[{0, 0, 0}, {1, 2, 3}], 
  MaxCellMeasure -> {"Area" -> 0.03}]

Mathematica graphics Mathematica graphics


It works on other polyhedra, too.


GraphicsRow[{#, dual@#}] &@ PolyhedronData@ "TruncatedDodecahedron"


Mathematica graphics


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...
Post a Comment
Read more