Skip to main content

numerics - Does Mathematica get Pi wrong?


I happened to watch a Youtube video on Pi. According to the video, the 1 millionth digit of Pi is 1. And here is another page of the first 1 million digits of Pi.


You can get the same answer from WolframAlpha.


However, if you let Mathematica to calculate the digits you will get:


N[Pi, 1000005]
....65200102821**3**0222`1000005.


You will notice the 1 millionth digit of Pi in Mathematica is 3, not 1. Is anything wrong here?


Actually, if you move back 32 digits, you can see the exact digits as in the video.


**5779458151**309275628320845315846520010282130222`1000005.

Updates:


According to the answers, you can obtain the correct digits by following commands:




  1. Command from answer of @m_goldberg


    RealDigits[N[Pi, 1000001]][[1, -10 ;; -1]]





  2. Similarly, you can convert the number to string, which is the answer of @Daniel_Lichtblau


    str = ToString[N[Pi, 1000001], InputForm];
    Characters[str][[1000002 - 9 ;; 1000002]]




  3. RealDigits can extract specific digits as in the answer of @Mr.Wizard


    RealDigits[Pi, 10, 10, 9 - 1*^6]





The last one is much faster than others:


In[334]:= Timing[RealDigits[Pi, 10, 10, 9 - 1*^6]]

Out[334]= {0.036622, {{5, 7, 7, 9, 4, 5, 8, 1, 5, 1}, -999990}}

In[335]:= Timing[RealDigits[N[Pi, 1000001]][[1, -10 ;; -1]]]

Out[335]= {0.229211, {5, 7, 7, 9, 4, 5, 8, 1, 5, 1}}


If this problem is generalized to obtain 1 million digits after decimal mark, the first two commands may provide wrong results. As is mentioned in the answer of @Mr.Wizard, the result provided by RealDigits[Pi, 10, 10, 9 - 1*^6] is the 999,991 to 1,000,000 digits behind decimal mark, nevertheless how many digits before the decimal mark. But for the first two method these digits should be counted and subtracted from the result. For the second method, the decimal mark takes one character, which should be included in the calculation.


The first method can be modified to following codes to consider the digits before decimal mark, but enough digits must be obtained in the first command:


num = RealDigits @ N[Pi, 1000010];   
num[[1,999991+num[[2]];;1000000+num[[2]]]]

Conclusions




  1. Command N does not guarantee to output exactly number of digits as the command requiring. Moreover, different results may be obtained in different version of Mathematica.





  2. RealDigits with four arguments is the most efficient way to extract specific digits in a number.




  3. Converting number to InputForm is another possible way to obtain the digits without RealDigits command.





Answer



You have selected the wrong digit. Mathematica gets the digit in the million-th decimal place right if the calculation is performed correctly.


 q = N[Pi, 1000010];

RealDigits[q][[1, 1000001]]


1

I take the 1000001-th digit because RealDigits includes the integer part, 3.


Update


It is really important to use RealDigits to decide this question. Looking at the displayed full form number is not reliable because it shows extra digits added in the working precision needed to get the specified real precision. Consider


N[Pi, 20] // FullForm



  3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749`20.

That's a lot more than the 20 digits asked for. However,


RealDigits @ N[Pi, 20]


{{3, 1, 4, 1, 5, 9, 2, 6, 5, 3, 5, 8, 9, 7, 9, 3, 2, 3, 8, 4}, 1}

gives the actual set of correct digits.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.