Skip to main content

numerics - Does Mathematica get Pi wrong?


I happened to watch a Youtube video on Pi. According to the video, the 1 millionth digit of Pi is 1. And here is another page of the first 1 million digits of Pi.


You can get the same answer from WolframAlpha.


However, if you let Mathematica to calculate the digits you will get:


N[Pi, 1000005]
....65200102821**3**0222`1000005.


You will notice the 1 millionth digit of Pi in Mathematica is 3, not 1. Is anything wrong here?


Actually, if you move back 32 digits, you can see the exact digits as in the video.


**5779458151**309275628320845315846520010282130222`1000005.

Updates:


According to the answers, you can obtain the correct digits by following commands:




  1. Command from answer of @m_goldberg


    RealDigits[N[Pi, 1000001]][[1, -10 ;; -1]]





  2. Similarly, you can convert the number to string, which is the answer of @Daniel_Lichtblau


    str = ToString[N[Pi, 1000001], InputForm];
    Characters[str][[1000002 - 9 ;; 1000002]]




  3. RealDigits can extract specific digits as in the answer of @Mr.Wizard


    RealDigits[Pi, 10, 10, 9 - 1*^6]





The last one is much faster than others:


In[334]:= Timing[RealDigits[Pi, 10, 10, 9 - 1*^6]]

Out[334]= {0.036622, {{5, 7, 7, 9, 4, 5, 8, 1, 5, 1}, -999990}}

In[335]:= Timing[RealDigits[N[Pi, 1000001]][[1, -10 ;; -1]]]

Out[335]= {0.229211, {5, 7, 7, 9, 4, 5, 8, 1, 5, 1}}


If this problem is generalized to obtain 1 million digits after decimal mark, the first two commands may provide wrong results. As is mentioned in the answer of @Mr.Wizard, the result provided by RealDigits[Pi, 10, 10, 9 - 1*^6] is the 999,991 to 1,000,000 digits behind decimal mark, nevertheless how many digits before the decimal mark. But for the first two method these digits should be counted and subtracted from the result. For the second method, the decimal mark takes one character, which should be included in the calculation.


The first method can be modified to following codes to consider the digits before decimal mark, but enough digits must be obtained in the first command:


num = RealDigits @ N[Pi, 1000010];   
num[[1,999991+num[[2]];;1000000+num[[2]]]]

Conclusions




  1. Command N does not guarantee to output exactly number of digits as the command requiring. Moreover, different results may be obtained in different version of Mathematica.





  2. RealDigits with four arguments is the most efficient way to extract specific digits in a number.




  3. Converting number to InputForm is another possible way to obtain the digits without RealDigits command.





Answer



You have selected the wrong digit. Mathematica gets the digit in the million-th decimal place right if the calculation is performed correctly.


 q = N[Pi, 1000010];

RealDigits[q][[1, 1000001]]


1

I take the 1000001-th digit because RealDigits includes the integer part, 3.


Update


It is really important to use RealDigits to decide this question. Looking at the displayed full form number is not reliable because it shows extra digits added in the working precision needed to get the specified real precision. Consider


N[Pi, 20] // FullForm



  3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749`20.

That's a lot more than the 20 digits asked for. However,


RealDigits @ N[Pi, 20]


{{3, 1, 4, 1, 5, 9, 2, 6, 5, 3, 5, 8, 9, 7, 9, 3, 2, 3, 8, 4}, 1}

gives the actual set of correct digits.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

calculus and analysis - Integral of the Sinc product

Let us consider the following integral $$ B_n = \int_0^\infty \prod_{k=1,3,5,\dots}^n\frac{\sin (x/k)}{x/k}dx $$ By definition, Sinc[x] == Sin[x]/x , therefore B[n_?OddQ] := Integrate[Product[Sinc[x/k], {k, 1, n, 2}], {x, 0, Infinity}] B /@ Range[1, 13, 2] {Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2} OK, everything is fine. But... B[15] 467807924713440738696537864469 Pi/935615849440640907310521750000 What's going on? Answer As Eckhard wrote in comments B[n] is the n-th Borwein integral . (The letter B was not accidental :) ) This funny properties of Borwein integrals is related to the Fourier transform of Sinc function FourierTransform[Sinc[x], x, k] 1/2 Sqrt[Pi/2] (Sign[1 - k] + Sign[1 + k]) Plot[%, {k, -2, 2}, Filling -> 0] which is the box function. The result is $\pi/2$ while the sum $$ 1/3+1/5+\dots+1/n $$ B_n = \frac{\pi}{2} - \pi \bigg(\sum_{k=3,5,\ldots}^n\frac{1}{k} -1\biggr)^\frac{n-1}{2}\prod_{k=3,5,\dots}^n\frac{k}{k-1}. $$ For $n=15$ it is equal to $$ \frac{46780...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...