Skip to main content

Fitting points to tilted, off-center ellipse


I have 24 x-y points that are supposed to form an ellipse.


points={{31.4799,432.849},{-195.826,356.419},{210.029,121.779},{76.1586,-4.47992},{26.6061,-6.97711},{160.236,27.0398},{203.248,241.865},{-225.351,218.912},{-159.899,109.93},{-106.465,58.164},{-1.98952*10^-11,442.},{-229.146,324.489},{-31.4799,9.15114},{195.826,85.5807},{-210.029,320.221},{-76.1586,446.48},{-26.6061,448.977},{-160.236,414.96},{-203.248,200.135},{225.351,223.088},{159.899,332.07},{106.465,383.836},{-1.98952*10^-11,1.83076*10^-11},{229.146,117.511}};
points//ListPlot

points


I want to numerically fit an ellipse around those points. I tried to use the NMinimize method with least-square shown in this Q&A but the issue in this problem is that x and y are related parametrically (through t), and not directly like that other problem was. Worse, the ellipse will be off-center and tilted, so I can't use the nice $$\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)^2+\left(\frac{y}{b}\right)^2=1$$ but had to use this equation I found on Wikipedia (surprisingly without citation!):


ellipsewiki



My strategy was to generate 24 X(t) equations and 24 Y(t) equations, or more specifically, X(t1), Y(t1), ..., X(t24), X(t24) with xc, yc, a, b in them. Then, I would use NMinimize to optimize all of the square differences between my points and the ellipse. I would eventually get back xc, yc, a, b, CurlyPhi, and every single t values from t1 to t24. I tried to find a more elegant way of using NMinimized for parametric equations, and I believe the multivariate examples of NMinimized in the documentation are not exactly parametric equations. See also the linked Q&A above for an example.


Here's my code to find xc, yc, a, b, t1, ... , t24:


tList = ToExpression["t" <> ToString[#]] & /@ Range[1, 24];
equations = Join[
MapThread[#1 - xc - a Cos[#2] Cos[φ] +
b Sin[#2] Sin[φ] &, {points[[All, 1]], tList}],
MapThread[#1 - yc - a Cos[#2] Sin[φ] -
b Sin[#2] Cos[φ] &, {points[[All, 2]], tList}]];
solution = NMinimize[
#.# &[equations],

Join[tList, {xc, yc, a, b, φ}]]

equations


And this is what the ellipse looks like:


Show[

(* Tilted ellipse/disk drawn using Disk and Rotate *)
Graphics[
{Yellow,
Rotate[Disk[{xc, yc}, {Abs@a, b}], φ] /.

solution[[2, 25 ;; 29]]}],

(* Starting points *)
points // ListPlot,

(* Ellipse outline plotted by the 2 parametric equations *)
ParametricPlot[{xc + a Cos[t] Cos[φ] -
b Sin[t] Sin[φ],
yc + a Cos[t] Sin[φ] + b Sin[t] Cos[φ]} /.
solution[[2, 25 ;; 29]], {t, 0, 2 π}, PlotStyle -> Red],


(* Point on ellipse corresponding to t1 to t24 *)
ListPlot[{xc + a Cos[#] Cos[φ] - b Sin[#] Sin[φ],
yc + a Cos[#] Sin[φ] + b Sin[#] Cos[φ]} /.
solution[[2, 25 ;; 29]] & /@ solution[[2, 1 ;; 24, 2]],
PlotStyle -> Red],

Axes -> True]

ellipse



Even though I got what I want, I just feel that this is clunky way to solve the problem, not least because I don't need to solve for t1 to t24--I just needed xc, yc, a, and b. Another issue is that for some reason the value of my a (supposed to be the long axis) is negative and smaller in magnitude than the other axis*, and the rotate angle of the ellipse is crazy high (88.7 radian). I tried to apply some constrains to NMinimize (a>0 or 90 ° < φ < 150 °) but kept getting errors.


NMinimized error


*


ellipse wiki reference


Lastly, I'd really appreciate any general comment to make my code better as I'm still a beginner in MMA (you probably could tell by my zeal of pure functions in this example; I've just been reading a chapter about them).



Answer



Here is another approach. It could be improved (I am sure) to properly determined the principle axes and translation (if I get time I will aim to update):


lin = {#1^2, #1, #2, 2 #1 #2, #2^2} & @@@ points;
lm = LinearModelFit[lin, {1, a, b, c, d}, {a, b, c, d}]


Exploring model:


lm["ParameterTable"]

enter image description here


Determining quadric formula:


pa = lm["BestFitParameters"];
w[x_, y_] := pa.{1, x^2, x, y, 2 x y} - y^2;
ContourPlot[w[x, y] == 0, {x, -400, 400}, {y, -200, 500},
Epilog -> Point[points]]


enter image description here


Formula:


TraditionalForm[-w[x, y] == 0]

enter image description here


UPDATE


I post this update to determine the translation from origin, the principle axes and the $a$ and $b$ of the desired form $\frac{x^2}{a^2}+\frac{y^2}{b^2}=1$ and hence assessment of area of ellipse: viz $\pi a b$ etc. The axes can be swapped as desired.


The translation can be derived as follows:


{dx, dy} = 
0.5 Inverse[{{-pa[[2]], -pa[[5]]}, {-pa[[5]], 1}}].{pa[[3]], pa[[4]]}


yielding:


{0.0000180983, 221.}

The axes can be derived from the matrix of quadric form:


mat = {{-pa[[2]], -pa[[5]]}, {-pa[[5]], 1}};
const = (-pa[[2]] dx^2 + dy^2 - 2 pa[[5]] dx dy) - pa[[1]]
trf[x_, y_] := -pa[[2]] (x - dx)^2 -
2 pa[[5]] (x - dx) (y - dy) + (y - dy)^2 - const


Then translating ellipse back to origin:


tran = Simplify@trf[x + dx, y + dy]

yields:


-49550.5 + 1.02504 x^2 + 0.498521 x y + y^2=0


Then looking at the eigensystem of matrix will allow visualization of principal axes:


fun[poly_, a_] := Module[{mat, val, vc, vcn, gr},
mat = {{#1, #2/2}, {#2/2, #3}} & @@ (Coefficient[
poly, {x^2, x y, y^2}]);
{val, vc} = Eigensystem[mat];

vcn = Normalize /@ vc;
gr = Graphics[{Line[{{0, 0}, Sqrt[a] vcn[[1]]/Sqrt[Abs@val[[1]]]}],
Line[{{0, 0}, Sqrt[a] vcn[[2]]/Sqrt[Abs@val[[2]]]}]}];
Show[ContourPlot[poly == a, {x, -500, 500}, {y, -500, 500}], gr]
];

The values of $a$ and $b$ can e derived:


{ev, vec} = Eigensystem[mat];
st = {x^2, y^2}.ev;
{a, b} = Sqrt[1/Coefficient[Expand[st/const], {x^2, y^2}]]


yields:


{198.143, 254.846}

Putting visualizations all together:


cntr = ContourPlot[trf[x, y] == 0, {x, -500, 500}, {y, -200, 500}, 
Epilog -> {Point[points], {Red, PointSize[0.03], Point[{dx, dy}]}}];
axes = fun[1.0250354570455185` x^2 + 0.49852055996040495` x y + y^2,
49550.46446156194`];
norm = ContourPlot[st == const, {x, -500, 500}, {y, -500, 500}];


These graphics and corresponding equations were threaded then exported as an animated gif:


grap = Show[#, PlotRange -> {{-500, 500}, {-500, 500}}] & /@ {cntr, 
axes, norm}
eqns = Style[#, 20] & /@ {TraditionalForm[trf[x, y] == 0],
TraditionalForm[
1.0250354570455185` x^2 + 0.49852055996040495` x y + y^2 ==
49550.46446156194`], TraditionalForm[ell[x, y] == 0]}

enter image description here



The gif cycles through (i) data with fit and red point is {dx,dy} (ii) the second is the ellipse translated to the origin (iii) the ellipse axes are 'aligned' to cartesian axes.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...