Skip to main content

differential equations - WhenEvent error in NDSolve


I’m trying to solve a discontinuous differential equation where there are lost of energy when the trajectory cross the discontinuous manifold. The code I used was


sol1 = NDSolve[{x'[t] == y[t], y'[t] == x[t] - Sign[x[t]], x[0] == 0, y[0] == 0.5, 
WhenEvent[
x[t] == 0, {y[t] -> 0.5*y[t]}]}, {x,

y}, {t, 0, 4}];
ParametricPlot[Evaluate[{x[t], x'[t]} /. sol1], {t, 0, 4}, PlotRange -> {{-0.8, 0.8}, {-1, 1}}]

The function WhenEvent it should realize the lost of energy when trajectory cross discontinuous. But when we use the Sign[x] this not happen. For instance, let take the code


sol2 = NDSolve[{x'[t] == y[t], y'[t] == -x[t], x[0] == 0, y[0] == 0.5, 
WhenEvent[
x[t] == 0, {y[t] -> 0.5*y[t]}]}, {x,
y}, {t, 0, 4}];
ParametricPlot[Evaluate[{x[t], x'[t]} /. sol2], {t, 0, 4}, PlotRange -> {{-0.8, 0.8}, {-1, 1}}]


In this example the WhenEvent work normally. Anyone know what happen?



Answer



The problem is that the "DiscontinuityProcessing" stage of NSolve seems to supersede the WhenEvent. One way is too use use Method -> {"DiscontinuityProcessing" -> False}, but that is highly inefficient. A better way is to prevent Sign from being analyzed by wrapping it in a numeric black box and include a "CrossDiscontinuity" event at x[t] == 0. Both events will be processed. There were some issues (bugs?) I will discuss at the end.


sgn[u_?NumericQ] := Sign[u];
mstep = 0;
nstep = 0;
sol1 = NDSolve[{x'[t] == y[t], y'[t] == x[t] - sgn[x[t]], x[0] == 0,
y[0] == 1/2,
WhenEvent[x[t] == 0, mstep++; "CrossDiscontinuity"],
WhenEvent[x[t] == 0, nstep++; y[t] -> 1/2*y[t]],

WhenEvent[Norm[{x[t], y[t]}] < 1*^-6, "StopIntegration"]
}, {x, y}, {t, 0, 4}(*,WorkingPrecision\[Rule]20*)];
{mstep, nstep}
Evaluate@Flatten[{t, x["Domain"] /. sol1}]
ParametricPlot[Evaluate[{x[t], x'[t]} /. sol1],
Evaluate@Flatten[{t, x["Domain"] /. sol1}],
PlotRange -> {{-0.55, 0.55}, {-0.55, 0.55}}, PlotStyle -> Thick,
ColorFunction -> Function[{x, y, t}, ColorData["Rainbow", t]]]
(*
{18, 18}

{t, 0., 2.11063}
*)

Mathematica graphics


The integration finishes in a finite amount of time (the solutions approaches the origin in finite time). The number of crossings seems to approach infinity, so I included a stopping criterion as an event. The number of crossings detected depends on WorkingPrecision, perhaps because as the solution approaches the origin, more precision is needed. The worst or most mystifying behavior is that the event actions


"CrossSlidingDiscontinuity"          (* simple String *)
Null; "CrossSlidingDiscontinuity" (* CompoundExpression *)

and


y[t] -> 1/2*y[t]                     (* plain Rule *)

Null; y[t] -> 1/2*y[t] (* CompoundExpression *)

produced different results. Indeed, the simpler, first actions, missed many events. The compound expressions seem to catch them all (although issues with precision seem to arise as the solution becomes very small). In the code above, I left some diagnostic step-counters. It seems any CompoundExpression causes all the events to be detected.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...