functions - How do I override options with my own defaults?

I'm calling a function f from within a function g and would like to pass any valid options for f to g, replacing some (say, optA and optB) with defaults different from those defined for f.

What is the right way to do this?

I can get things to (seemingly) work with

Options[g] = Join[FilterRules[Options[f], Except[optA | optB]], {optA -> 0, optB -> 0}];
g[x, opts : OptionsPattern[]] := 
    f[x, opts, OptA -> OptionValue[OptA], optB -> OptionValue[optB]]

but this looks pretty verbose to me. Is there a better, more idiomatic, way?

Answer

Here is what I do in such cases ([edit from 01/10/2020 - apparently, this technique has been exposed on this site earlier, at least partially, in this nice answer by Mr.Wizard - which I definitely read but must have forgotten at the time of posting my answer]) :

ClearAll[g, f];
Options[f] = {optA -> 1, optB -> 1, optC -> 1};
f[x_, opts : OptionsPattern[]] := 
   {OptionValue[optA], OptionValue[optB], OptionValue[optC]}

Options[g] = {optA -> 0, optB -> 0};
g[x_, opts : OptionsPattern[{g, f}]] := f[x, opts, Sequence @@ Options[g]]

In other words, only define options for g which belong to g, and inherit other options from f via the argument of OptionsPattern. Also, pass all options of g explicitly in the call to f, as in Sequence @@ Options[g]. The fact that they come after opts means that they will be over-ridden by opts, as they should be.

Examples:

g[1]

(* {0, 0, 1} *)

g[1, optA -> 2]

(* {2, 0, 1} *)

The added advantage of this scheme is that it is free from the flaw mentioned by Szabolcs, in that subsequent changes of Options[f] will be picked up in this method automatically.

Comments

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.

Blog

Search This Blog