Skip to main content

functions - How do I override options with my own defaults?


I'm calling a function f from within a function g and would like to pass any valid options for f to g, replacing some (say, optA and optB) with defaults different from those defined for f.


What is the right way to do this?


I can get things to (seemingly) work with


Options[g] = Join[FilterRules[Options[f], Except[optA | optB]], {optA -> 0, optB -> 0}];
g[x, opts : OptionsPattern[]] :=
f[x, opts, OptA -> OptionValue[OptA], optB -> OptionValue[optB]]

but this looks pretty verbose to me. Is there a better, more idiomatic, way?




Answer



Here is what I do in such cases ([edit from 01/10/2020 - apparently, this technique has been exposed on this site earlier, at least partially, in this nice answer by Mr.Wizard - which I definitely read but must have forgotten at the time of posting my answer]) :


ClearAll[g, f];
Options[f] = {optA -> 1, optB -> 1, optC -> 1};
f[x_, opts : OptionsPattern[]] :=
{OptionValue[optA], OptionValue[optB], OptionValue[optC]}

Options[g] = {optA -> 0, optB -> 0};
g[x_, opts : OptionsPattern[{g, f}]] := f[x, opts, Sequence @@ Options[g]]


In other words, only define options for g which belong to g, and inherit other options from f via the argument of OptionsPattern. Also, pass all options of g explicitly in the call to f, as in Sequence @@ Options[g]. The fact that they come after opts means that they will be over-ridden by opts, as they should be.


Examples:


g[1]

(* {0, 0, 1} *)

g[1, optA -> 2]

(* {2, 0, 1} *)


The added advantage of this scheme is that it is free from the flaw mentioned by Szabolcs, in that subsequent changes of Options[f] will be picked up in this method automatically.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...