Skip to main content

equation solving - How to find a tangent line with 2 points of tangency for a curve?


Say I have a function like this:


f[x_] := 4 x^4 - 9 x^3 - x^2 + 10;
Plot[f[x], {x, -1, 2}]


enter image description here


It's obvious that there's a tangent line with 2 points of tangency here:


enter image description here


The problem is, how can I find this line programmatically for any such curve given?




UPDATE: Sorry, I lied. My function is actually f[\[CurlyPhi]_] := 1.100955 \[CurlyPhi] (1 - \[CurlyPhi]) + \[CurlyPhi]/9.99968* Log[\[CurlyPhi]] + (1 - \[CurlyPhi]) Log[1 - \[CurlyPhi]], which, even with a "Rationalize" at the head, yields a error message as follows:



This system cannot be solved with the methods available to Reduce.




What can I do about this?



Answer



Introduction:


We are looking for two distinct values of $x$ for which a generic line and your function have 1) the same $y$ value (i.e. the line touches the curve) and 2) the same derivative (i.e. the line is tangent to the curve).


We can set up the following system of equations spelling out these conditions:


y[x_] := a x + b                      (* a generic line *)
f[x_] := 4 x^4 - 9 x^3 - x^2 + 10; (* your function *)

sol = List@ToRules@Reduce[
{y[x1] == f[x1],

y'[x1] == f'[x1],
y[x2] == f[x2],
y'[x2] == f'[x2],
x2 != x1},
{x1, x2}
]

solutions


Notice that Solve wouldn't work here, because there are no general solutions valid for all values of the parameters (indeed, Solve will return the empty set). Reduce will generate conditions valid for some values of the parameters $a$ and $b$, which is what we are looking for. Reduce returns equations as results, but I converted those to substitution rules for plotting.


Plot[

{f[x], y[x] /. sol}, {x, -1, 2},
Epilog -> {PointSize[0.015], Point[{{x1, f[x1]}, {x2, f[x2]}}] //. sol}
]

plot


A self-contained function:


We can package this in a function:


Clear[doubleTangent]
doubleTangent[f_, range_ /; VectorQ[range, NumericQ] && Dimensions[range] == {2}] :=
Module[

{x1, x2, a, b, y, sol},
y[x_] := a x + b;
sol = Solve[{
f[x1] == y[x1], f[x2] == y[x2],
f'[x1] == y'[x1], f'[x2] == y'[x2], x1 != x2},
{x1, x2, a, b}, Reals
];
Plot[
{f[x], y[x] /. sol},
Evaluate@Flatten@{x, range},

PlotLegends -> {"function", "tangent"},
Epilog -> {
ReplaceRepeated[
{
PointSize[0.02],
Tooltip[Point[{#, f[#]}], Round[{#, f[#]}, 0.01]] & /@ {x1, x2}
},
N@sol
],
Inset[

"a = " <> ToString[N[a /. First@sol]] <> "\nb = " <> ToString[N[b /. First@sol]],
Scaled[{0.9, 0.9}], Alignment -> Left
]
}
]
]

This function will return the same result found above, with annotations, when used as follows:


doubleTangent[4 #^4 - 9 #^3 - #^2 + 10 &, {-1, 2}]


old example with doubleTangent


Yet another case:


doubleTangent[3 #^4 - 12 #^2 + 5 # + 9 &, {-3, 3}]

another example


Using a numerical solver for non-polynomial functions:


Here is a version relying on a numerical solver (FindRoot) to solve the system of equations in those cases in which Solve or Reduce are unable to provide a solution. Of course, the method is quite a bit more brittle, and initial (even rough) estimates must be provided of the positions of the points of tangency. It is fiddly, but it works nonetheless :-)


Clear[doubleTangentNumeric]

doubleTangentNumeric[

f_,
range_ /; VectorQ[range, NumericQ] && Dimensions[range] == {2},
initval_ /; VectorQ[initval, NumericQ] && Dimensions[initval] == {2}
] := Module[
{x1, x2, a, b, y, sol},
y[x_] := a x + b;
(* This is the BIG CHANGE; using a numerical solver rather than Solve or Reduce *)
sol = FindRoot[
{f[x1] == y[x1],
f[x2] == y[x2],

f'[x1] == y'[x1],
f'[x2] == y'[x2]},
{{x1, initval[[1]]},
{x2, initval[[2]]},
{a, 1}, {b, 1}},
WorkingPrecision -> 30, MaxIterations -> 1000
];
Plot[
{f[x], y[x] /. sol},
Evaluate@Flatten@{x, range},

PlotLegends -> {"function", "tangent"},

(* Replaced First@sol with sol, since only one solution is returned by FindRoot *)
Epilog -> {
ReplaceRepeated[{PointSize[0.02],
Tooltip[Point[{#, f[#]}], Round[{#, f[#]}, 0.01]] & /@ {x1, x2}}, N@sol],
Inset[
"a = " <> ToString[N[a /. sol]] <> "\nb = " <> ToString[N[b /. sol]],
Scaled[{0.8, 0.8}], Alignment -> Left]
}

]
]

We can now try it on the function from your comment:


f = Log[1 - #1] (1 - #1) + (3125 Log[#1] #1)/31249 + (73666 (1 - #1) #1)/66911 &;

doubleTangentNumeric[f, {0, 1}, {0.1, 0.9}]

numerical results


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Adding a thick curve to a regionplot

Suppose we have the following simple RegionPlot: f[x_] := 1 - x^2 g[x_] := 1 - 0.5 x^2 RegionPlot[{y < f[x], f[x] < y < g[x], y > g[x]}, {x, 0, 2}, {y, 0, 2}] Now I'm trying to change the curve defined by $y=g[x]$ into a thick black curve, while leaving all other boundaries in the plot unchanged. I've tried adding the region $y=g[x]$ and playing with the plotstyle, which didn't work, and I've tried BoundaryStyle, which changed all the boundaries in the plot. Now I'm kinda out of ideas... Any help would be appreciated! Answer With f[x_] := 1 - x^2 g[x_] := 1 - 0.5 x^2 You can use Epilog to add the thick line: RegionPlot[{y < f[x], f[x] < y < g[x], y > g[x]}, {x, 0, 2}, {y, 0, 2}, PlotPoints -> 50, Epilog -> (Plot[g[x], {x, 0, 2}, PlotStyle -> {Black, Thick}][[1]]), PlotStyle -> {Directive[Yellow, Opacity[0.4]], Directive[Pink, Opacity[0.4]],