Skip to main content

equation solving - How to find a tangent line with 2 points of tangency for a curve?


Say I have a function like this:


f[x_] := 4 x^4 - 9 x^3 - x^2 + 10;
Plot[f[x], {x, -1, 2}]


enter image description here


It's obvious that there's a tangent line with 2 points of tangency here:


enter image description here


The problem is, how can I find this line programmatically for any such curve given?




UPDATE: Sorry, I lied. My function is actually f[\[CurlyPhi]_] := 1.100955 \[CurlyPhi] (1 - \[CurlyPhi]) + \[CurlyPhi]/9.99968* Log[\[CurlyPhi]] + (1 - \[CurlyPhi]) Log[1 - \[CurlyPhi]], which, even with a "Rationalize" at the head, yields a error message as follows:



This system cannot be solved with the methods available to Reduce.




What can I do about this?



Answer



Introduction:


We are looking for two distinct values of $x$ for which a generic line and your function have 1) the same $y$ value (i.e. the line touches the curve) and 2) the same derivative (i.e. the line is tangent to the curve).


We can set up the following system of equations spelling out these conditions:


y[x_] := a x + b                      (* a generic line *)
f[x_] := 4 x^4 - 9 x^3 - x^2 + 10; (* your function *)

sol = List@ToRules@Reduce[
{y[x1] == f[x1],

y'[x1] == f'[x1],
y[x2] == f[x2],
y'[x2] == f'[x2],
x2 != x1},
{x1, x2}
]

solutions


Notice that Solve wouldn't work here, because there are no general solutions valid for all values of the parameters (indeed, Solve will return the empty set). Reduce will generate conditions valid for some values of the parameters $a$ and $b$, which is what we are looking for. Reduce returns equations as results, but I converted those to substitution rules for plotting.


Plot[

{f[x], y[x] /. sol}, {x, -1, 2},
Epilog -> {PointSize[0.015], Point[{{x1, f[x1]}, {x2, f[x2]}}] //. sol}
]

plot


A self-contained function:


We can package this in a function:


Clear[doubleTangent]
doubleTangent[f_, range_ /; VectorQ[range, NumericQ] && Dimensions[range] == {2}] :=
Module[

{x1, x2, a, b, y, sol},
y[x_] := a x + b;
sol = Solve[{
f[x1] == y[x1], f[x2] == y[x2],
f'[x1] == y'[x1], f'[x2] == y'[x2], x1 != x2},
{x1, x2, a, b}, Reals
];
Plot[
{f[x], y[x] /. sol},
Evaluate@Flatten@{x, range},

PlotLegends -> {"function", "tangent"},
Epilog -> {
ReplaceRepeated[
{
PointSize[0.02],
Tooltip[Point[{#, f[#]}], Round[{#, f[#]}, 0.01]] & /@ {x1, x2}
},
N@sol
],
Inset[

"a = " <> ToString[N[a /. First@sol]] <> "\nb = " <> ToString[N[b /. First@sol]],
Scaled[{0.9, 0.9}], Alignment -> Left
]
}
]
]

This function will return the same result found above, with annotations, when used as follows:


doubleTangent[4 #^4 - 9 #^3 - #^2 + 10 &, {-1, 2}]


old example with doubleTangent


Yet another case:


doubleTangent[3 #^4 - 12 #^2 + 5 # + 9 &, {-3, 3}]

another example


Using a numerical solver for non-polynomial functions:


Here is a version relying on a numerical solver (FindRoot) to solve the system of equations in those cases in which Solve or Reduce are unable to provide a solution. Of course, the method is quite a bit more brittle, and initial (even rough) estimates must be provided of the positions of the points of tangency. It is fiddly, but it works nonetheless :-)


Clear[doubleTangentNumeric]

doubleTangentNumeric[

f_,
range_ /; VectorQ[range, NumericQ] && Dimensions[range] == {2},
initval_ /; VectorQ[initval, NumericQ] && Dimensions[initval] == {2}
] := Module[
{x1, x2, a, b, y, sol},
y[x_] := a x + b;
(* This is the BIG CHANGE; using a numerical solver rather than Solve or Reduce *)
sol = FindRoot[
{f[x1] == y[x1],
f[x2] == y[x2],

f'[x1] == y'[x1],
f'[x2] == y'[x2]},
{{x1, initval[[1]]},
{x2, initval[[2]]},
{a, 1}, {b, 1}},
WorkingPrecision -> 30, MaxIterations -> 1000
];
Plot[
{f[x], y[x] /. sol},
Evaluate@Flatten@{x, range},

PlotLegends -> {"function", "tangent"},

(* Replaced First@sol with sol, since only one solution is returned by FindRoot *)
Epilog -> {
ReplaceRepeated[{PointSize[0.02],
Tooltip[Point[{#, f[#]}], Round[{#, f[#]}, 0.01]] & /@ {x1, x2}}, N@sol],
Inset[
"a = " <> ToString[N[a /. sol]] <> "\nb = " <> ToString[N[b /. sol]],
Scaled[{0.8, 0.8}], Alignment -> Left]
}

]
]

We can now try it on the function from your comment:


f = Log[1 - #1] (1 - #1) + (3125 Log[#1] #1)/31249 + (73666 (1 - #1) #1)/66911 &;

doubleTangentNumeric[f, {0, 1}, {0.1, 0.9}]

numerical results


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...