Skip to main content

evaluation - Side-effecting an array in an association?


I'm working on some classical data structures (stack, queue, etc.) and want to mimic oo style in MMA. As a first attempt, I want to store an array in an Association, like this:


q = <|elems -> ConstantArray[Null, 4]|>


<|elems -> {Null, Null, Null, Null}|>

Later, I want to side-effect my array, like this


q[elems][[2]] = 42;



Set::setps: q[elems] in the part assignment is not a symbol. >>



Ahh, yes, of course, I need a symbol... Next attempt is this:


q = Module[{storage = ConstantArray[Null, 4]},
<|elems -> Hold[storage]|>]


<|elems -> Hold[storage$1987]|>


In[4]:= ReleaseHold[q[elems]][[2]] = 42


During evaluation of In[4]:= Set::setps: ReleaseHold[q[elems]] in the part assignment is not a symbol. >>


 42

Oh, yeah, that's not going to work.


I could do the following, but it's going to copy the array every time and defeat the purpose of implementing classical algorithms (that being "efficiency"):


q = <|elems -> ConstantArray[Null, 4]|>;

SetAttributes[setQ, HoldFirst];
setQ[q_, slot_, item_] :=
Module[{newElems = q[elems]},
newElems[[slot]] = item;
q[elems] = newElems;
q[elems]];
setQ[q, 2, 42]


{Null, 42, Null, Null}


It looks like I need some kind of variant of Part that doesn't evaluate a held symbol on its left-hand side -- a PartHoldFirst. I don't see a way to do this with stuff I know.



Answer



Maybe I don't understand what you're trying to do, but...


q = <|elems -> ConstantArray[Null, 4]|>

q[[1, 2]] = 42;

q



<|elems -> {Null, 42, Null, Null}|>

q[[Key[elems], 4]] = 99;


<|elems -> {Null, 42, Null, 99}|>

So whether you set by position or Key it works.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...