Skip to main content

equation solving - Finding Intersections Between Arbitrary Surface and A Line


I have a self-intersecting surface H defined as follows:


M = 0; phi = Pi/2;


b1 = {{-Sqrt[3]/2}, {3/2}};
b2 = {{-Sqrt[3]/2}, {-3/2}};
b3 = {{Sqrt[3]}, {0}};

hx[kx_, ky_] := 1 + Cos[{kx, ky}.b1] + Cos[{kx, ky}.b2]
hy[kx_, ky_] := Sin[{kx, ky}.b1] - Sin[{kx, ky}.b2]
hz[kx_, ky_] :=
M - 2 Sin[
phi] (Sin[{kx, ky}.b1] + Sin[{kx, ky}.b2] + Sin[{kx, ky}.b3])
H[kx_, ky_] =

Flatten[{hx[kx, ky], hy[kx, ky], hz[kx, ky]}, 1] // Simplify;

and I wish to find the number of times a line from the origin to some point {10, 10, 10} intersects with this surface.


What I have tried:




  1. Going off this reference - Graphics3D: Finding intersection of 3d objects and lines - I attempted to define a Region and line as follows:


    R = ParametricRegion[{H[u, v], 1.8 <= u <= 5.5 && -2.2 <= v <= 2.2}, {u,v}]; 
    TheLine = Line[{{0,0,0}, {10,10,10}}];


    and continue with the method given. However, Mathematica does not correctly give me the number of intersections, as it does not identify H as a properly defined Region. Additionally, my arbitrary surface is apparently "not a proper Graphics3D primitive or directive".




  2. To tackle this numerically, I tried populating a table of coordinates for the line and comparing it with values of my surface to see where the difference between coordinates for rows would be least (after ordering rows in ascending order). The line now goes as:


    p1 = {0, 0, 0};
    p2 = {10, 0, 10};
    v = p2 - p1;
    TheLine[t_] := p1 + t v

    However, this method is problematic because I miss several potential points. I read online that this could have worked if the third component of H is a function of the first two: H = {x,y,z(x,y)}. However, this is not the case.





  3. I tried solving the following system of 'equations':


    Solve[{x, y, z} \[Element] R && {x, y, z} \[Element] theLine, {x, y, z}, Reals]

    but this takes forever to run. I doubt this would work.


    Additionally, I don't think that I can solve for a system of equations like https://www.wolfram.com/mathematica/new-in-10/basic-and-formula-regions/surface-intersection.html in my case because a line cannot have a stand-alone equation of the form l(x,y,z) because a line is the intersection of two planes.




Perhaps I am missing something trivial, but none of the other potential solutions on this website seem to work. Therefore I would appreciate insight on any approach that would work! Thanks!




Answer



(I managed to borrow someone else's computer for a few minutes...)


Before anything else: using actual vectors instead of $2\times 1$ matrices will make constructing your parametric equations much easier. Thus:


M = 0; ϕ = π/2;
b1 = {-Sqrt[3]/2, 3/2}; b2 = {-Sqrt[3]/2, -3/2}; b3 = {Sqrt[3], 0};

Set up the parametric equations:


eqs = Thread[{x, y, z} == {1 + Cos[{kx, ky}.b1] + Cos[{kx, ky}.b2], 
Sin[{kx, ky}.b1] - Sin[{kx, ky}.b2],
M - 2 Sin[Ï•] (Sin[{kx, ky}.b1] + Sin[{kx, ky}.b2] +

Sin[{kx, ky}.b3])}];

Now, we can use GroebnerBasis[] to derive the implicit Cartesian equation:


impl = GroebnerBasis[Join[TrigExpand[eqs],
{Cos[(Sqrt[3] kx)/2]^2 + Sin[(Sqrt[3] kx)/2]^2 == 1,
Cos[ky/2]^2 + Sin[ky/2]^2 == 1}], {x, y, z},
{Cos[(Sqrt[3] kx)/2], Sin[(Sqrt[3] kx)/2],
Cos[ky/2], Sin[ky/2]}][[1]] // FullSimplify
(3 + (-4 + x) x + y^2)^2 (-3 + (-2 + x) x + y^2) + ((-1 + x)^2 + y^2) z^2


Deriving the intersection points is then as easy as


Solve[impl == 0, {x, y, z} ∈ InfiniteLine[{{0, 0, 0}, {10, 10, 10}}]] // FullSimplify
{{x -> Root[-27 + 54 #1 - 17 #1^2 - 58 #1^3 + 78 #1^4 - 40 #1^5 + 8 #1^6 &, 1],
y -> Root[-27 + 54 #1 - 17 #1^2 - 58 #1^3 + 78 #1^4 - 40 #1^5 + 8 #1^6 &, 1],
z -> Root[-27 + 54 #1 - 17 #1^2 - 58 #1^3 + 78 #1^4 - 40 #1^5 + 8 #1^6 &, 1]},
{x -> Root[-27 + 54 #1 - 17 #1^2 - 58 #1^3 + 78 #1^4 - 40 #1^5 + 8 #1^6 &, 2],
y -> Root[-27 + 54 #1 - 17 #1^2 - 58 #1^3 + 78 #1^4 - 40 #1^5 + 8 #1^6 &, 2],
z -> Root[-27 + 54 #1 - 17 #1^2 - 58 #1^3 + 78 #1^4 - 40 #1^5 + 8 #1^6 &, 2]}}

N[%]

{{x -> -0.814231, y -> -0.814231, z -> -0.814231},
{x -> 1.30996, y -> 1.30996, z -> 1.30996}}

Show the geometry:


Show[ParametricPlot3D[{1 + Cos[{kx, ky}.b1] + Cos[{kx, ky}.b2], 
Sin[{kx, ky}.b1] - Sin[{kx, ky}.b2],
M - 2 Sin[Ï•] (Sin[{kx, ky}.b1] + Sin[{kx, ky}.b2] +
Sin[{kx, ky}.b3])},
{kx, 1.8, 5.5}, {ky, -2.2, 2.2},
Mesh -> False, PlotStyle -> Opacity[1/2]],

Graphics3D[{Tube[Line[{{0, 0, 0}, {10, 10, 10}}]],
{Red, Sphere[{x, y, z}, 1/12] /. %}}]]

surface and intersection points with a line


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...