Skip to main content

plotting - PlotRangeClipping not working correctly with small ImageSize and PDF-export


Bug introduced in 8 or earlier and persists through 12.0.0 or later




Although Mathematica has some nice plotting capabilities, there are some things which are annoying me.


I like to export a Graphics to PDF for use in LATEX. I like to a have an ImageSize of the PDF file, which corresponds to the image size in my document (e.g. 6 cm). I don't like to scale my image in LATEX.


When exporting to PDF the PlotRangeClipping does not work as expected (especially when having a small ImageSize):


cm=72/2.54;
p1 = Graphics[{EdgeForm[{Red, Thickness[.1]}], FaceForm[], Disk[]},
Frame -> True,

PlotRange -> {{0, 1}, {0, 1}},
PlotRangeClipping -> True,
ImageSize -> 6 cm]
Export["p1.pdf", p1]

p2 = Graphics[{EdgeForm[{Red, Thickness[.1]}], FaceForm[], Disk[]},
Frame -> True,
PlotRange -> {{0, 1}, {0, 1}},
PlotRangeClipping -> True,
ImageSize -> 26 cm]

Export["p2.pdf", p2]

While the PlotRangeClipping for in the second generated file (p2.pdf) is more or less okay (not perfect),


p2.pdf magnified


there are serious problems in p1.pdf:


p1.pdf magnified


Is this a bug?


Is there a way to have an acceptable PlotRangePadding with a small ImageSize?



Answer



The reason why this overhang appears is that the Thickness of the line marking the edge of the Disk is not counted as something that needs to be clipped (although it should). The line itself (the center of the thick red line) is clipped correctly.



But of course the result looks very clumsy, and it can only be eliminated if the line thickness is made as small as the thickness of the Frame. So in order to get a prettier result, you have to mask the overhanging line thickness manually. Here is how you could do it:


p1 = Graphics[{EdgeForm[{Red, Thickness[.1]}], FaceForm[], Disk[]}, 
Frame -> True, PlotRange -> {{0, 1}, {0, 1}}];

Show[p1, With[{d = .2},
Graphics[
{White, FilledCurve[
{
{Line[{{-d, -d}, {-d, 1 + d}, {1 + d, 1 + d}, {1 + d, -d}}]},
{Line[{{0, 0}, {0, 1}, {1, 1}, {1, 0}}]}

}
]}
]
], ImageSize -> 6 cm]

The FilledCurve is a square with a hole in it, like a picture frame with a with border of thickness d = .2 in plot units.


The exported PDF looks like this:


exported pdf


Edit to make it work independently of PlotRange


To make the cropping frame resize automatically with the PlotRange, I went back to the question Changing the background color of a framed plot and saw that there was an answer by István Zachar that also uses FilledCurve and applies Scaled and ImageScaled to the rectangle borders. Using that approach directly still lets some of the red arc peek through in the notebook display, so I combined that approach with my above choice of an extra width d, and that should work for arbitrary PlotRange:



Show[p1, With[{d = .2}, 
Graphics[{White,
FilledCurve[{{Line[
ImageScaled /@ {{-d, -d}, {-d, 1 + d}, {1 + d,
1 + d}, {1 + d, -d}}]}, {Line[
Scaled /@ {{0, 0}, {0, 1}, {1, 1}, {1, 0}}]}}]}]],
ImageSize -> 6 cm]

For more games that you can play with FilledCurve, see e.g. Filling a polygon with a pattern of insets.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]