Skip to main content

plotting - PlotRangeClipping not working correctly with small ImageSize and PDF-export


Bug introduced in 8 or earlier and persists through 12.0.0 or later




Although Mathematica has some nice plotting capabilities, there are some things which are annoying me.


I like to export a Graphics to PDF for use in $\LaTeX$. I like to a have an ImageSize of the PDF file, which corresponds to the image size in my document (e.g. 6 cm). I don't like to scale my image in $\LaTeX$.


When exporting to PDF the PlotRangeClipping does not work as expected (especially when having a small ImageSize):


cm=72/2.54;
p1 = Graphics[{EdgeForm[{Red, Thickness[.1]}], FaceForm[], Disk[]},
Frame -> True,

PlotRange -> {{0, 1}, {0, 1}},
PlotRangeClipping -> True,
ImageSize -> 6 cm]
Export["p1.pdf", p1]

p2 = Graphics[{EdgeForm[{Red, Thickness[.1]}], FaceForm[], Disk[]},
Frame -> True,
PlotRange -> {{0, 1}, {0, 1}},
PlotRangeClipping -> True,
ImageSize -> 26 cm]

Export["p2.pdf", p2]

While the PlotRangeClipping for in the second generated file (p2.pdf) is more or less okay (not perfect),


p2.pdf magnified


there are serious problems in p1.pdf:


p1.pdf magnified


Is this a bug?


Is there a way to have an acceptable PlotRangePadding with a small ImageSize?



Answer



The reason why this overhang appears is that the Thickness of the line marking the edge of the Disk is not counted as something that needs to be clipped (although it should). The line itself (the center of the thick red line) is clipped correctly.



But of course the result looks very clumsy, and it can only be eliminated if the line thickness is made as small as the thickness of the Frame. So in order to get a prettier result, you have to mask the overhanging line thickness manually. Here is how you could do it:


p1 = Graphics[{EdgeForm[{Red, Thickness[.1]}], FaceForm[], Disk[]}, 
Frame -> True, PlotRange -> {{0, 1}, {0, 1}}];

Show[p1, With[{d = .2},
Graphics[
{White, FilledCurve[
{
{Line[{{-d, -d}, {-d, 1 + d}, {1 + d, 1 + d}, {1 + d, -d}}]},
{Line[{{0, 0}, {0, 1}, {1, 1}, {1, 0}}]}

}
]}
]
], ImageSize -> 6 cm]

The FilledCurve is a square with a hole in it, like a picture frame with a with border of thickness d = .2 in plot units.


The exported PDF looks like this:


exported pdf


Edit to make it work independently of PlotRange


To make the cropping frame resize automatically with the PlotRange, I went back to the question Changing the background color of a framed plot and saw that there was an answer by István Zachar that also uses FilledCurve and applies Scaled and ImageScaled to the rectangle borders. Using that approach directly still lets some of the red arc peek through in the notebook display, so I combined that approach with my above choice of an extra width d, and that should work for arbitrary PlotRange:



Show[p1, With[{d = .2}, 
Graphics[{White,
FilledCurve[{{Line[
ImageScaled /@ {{-d, -d}, {-d, 1 + d}, {1 + d,
1 + d}, {1 + d, -d}}]}, {Line[
Scaled /@ {{0, 0}, {0, 1}, {1, 1}, {1, 0}}]}}]}]],
ImageSize -> 6 cm]

For more games that you can play with FilledCurve, see e.g. Filling a polygon with a pattern of insets.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....