Skip to main content

evaluation - Expectation of a family of random variables


I did some search here, but seems that no one asked about this.


I want to define a family of independent and identically distributed random variables, $x_1,...,x_n$, and then calculates the expected value of some expressions like $\sum_{i,j=1}^nx_ix_j$. The result would be some function depending on $n$. Is there a way to do this?



Answer



Here is a general solution for any distribution whose moments exist ...


Notation Define the power sum $s_r$:



$$s_r=\sum _{i=1}^n X_i^r$$


The Problem


Let $\left(X_1,\ldots,X_n\right)$ denote $n$ iid random variables. This is the same problem as drawing a random sample of size $n$ from a population random variable $X$. The problem is to find:


$$E\Big(\sum_{i,j=1}^n X_i X_j\Big) = E\Big [\Big (\sum_{i=1}^n X_i\Big)^2\Big ] = E\Big [s_1^2\Big]$$


This is a problem known as finding moments of moments: they can be very difficult to solve by hand, but quite easy to solve with the help of a computer algebra system, for any arbitrary symmetric power sum. In this instance, we seek the expectation of $s_1^2$ ... i.e. the 1st raw moment of $s_1^2$ ... so the solution (expressed ToRaw moments of the population) is:


enter image description here


where RawMomentToRaw is a function from the mathStatica package for Mathematica, and where $\acute{\mu }_1$ and $\acute{\mu }_2$ denote the 1st and 2nd raw moments of random variable $X$, whatever its distribution (assuming they exist). All done.


More detail


There is an extensive discussion of moments of moments in Chapter 7 of our book:




  • Rose and Smith, "Mathematical Statistics with Mathematica", Springer, NY


A free download of the chapter is available here:


http://www.mathstatica.com/book/Rose_and_Smith_2002edition_Chapter7.pdf





Example 1: The Normal Distribution


If $X \sim N(\mu, \sigma^2)$, then: $$\acute{\mu }_1 = E[X] = \mu \quad \text{ and } \quad \acute{\mu }_2 = E[X^2] = \mu^2 + \sigma^2 $$


Substituting in $\acute{\mu }_1$ and $\acute{\mu }_2$ in Out[1] yields the solution: $$E\Big(\sum_{i,j=1}^n X_i X_j\Big) = n \left(n \mu ^2 + \sigma ^2\right)$$


Simple check: The Normal case with $n = 3$



In the case of $n = 3$, the joint pdf of $(X_1, X_2, X_3)$ is say $f(x_1, x_2, x_3)$:


enter image description here


The sum of products we are interested in is:


enter image description here


and the desired expectation is:


enter image description here


which matches perfectly the general $n$-Normal solution derived above, but with $n = 3$.




Example 2: The Uniform Distribution


If $X \sim Uniform(a,b)$ (as considered in both other answers), then: $$\acute{\mu }_1 = E[X] = \frac{a+b}{2} \quad \text{ and } \quad \acute{\mu }_2 = E[X^2] = \frac{1}{3} \left(a^2+a b+b^2\right)$$



Substituting in $\acute{\mu }_1$ and $\acute{\mu }_2$ in Out[1] yields the solution: $$E\Big(\sum_{i,j=1}^n X_i X_j\Big) =\frac{1}{3} n \left(a^2+a b+b^2\right)+\frac{1}{4} (n-1) n (a+b)^2$$


Again, this is different to the other answers posted - and much more complicated. Again, it is easy to perform a quick check:


Simple check: The Uniform case with $n = 3$


In the case of $n = 3$, the joint pdf of $(X_1, X_2, X_3)$ is say $g(x_1, x_2, x_3)$:


enter image description here


and the desired expectation is:


enter image description here


which matches perfectly our general $n$-Uniform solution derived above, with $n = 3$.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

front end - keyboard shortcut to invoke Insert new matrix

I frequently need to type in some matrices, and the menu command Insert > Table/Matrix > New... allows matrices with lines drawn between columns and rows, which is very helpful. I would like to make a keyboard shortcut for it, but cannot find the relevant frontend token command (4209405) for it. Since the FullForm[] and InputForm[] of matrices with lines drawn between rows and columns is the same as those without lines, it's hard to do this via 3rd party system-wide text expanders (e.g. autohotkey or atext on mac). How does one assign a keyboard shortcut for the menu item Insert > Table/Matrix > New... , preferably using only mathematica? Thanks! Answer In the MenuSetup.tr (for linux located in the $InstallationDirectory/SystemFiles/FrontEnd/TextResources/X/ directory), I changed the line MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog"] to read MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog", MenuKey["m", Modifiers-...

How to thread a list

I have data in format data = {{a1, a2}, {b1, b2}, {c1, c2}, {d1, d2}} Tableform: I want to thread it to : tdata = {{{a1, b1}, {a2, b2}}, {{a1, c1}, {a2, c2}}, {{a1, d1}, {a2, d2}}} Tableform: And I would like to do better then pseudofunction[n_] := Transpose[{data2[[1]], data2[[n]]}]; SetAttributes[pseudofunction, Listable]; Range[2, 4] // pseudofunction Here is my benchmark data, where data3 is normal sample of real data. data3 = Drop[ExcelWorkBook[[Column1 ;; Column4]], None, 1]; data2 = {a #, b #, c #, d #} & /@ Range[1, 10^5]; data = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {10^6, 4}]; Here is my benchmark code kptnw[list_] := Transpose[{Table[First@#, {Length@# - 1}], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list kptnw2[list_] := Transpose[{ConstantArray[First@#, Length@# - 1], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list OleksandrR[list_] := Flatten[Outer[List, List@First[list], Rest[list], 1], {{2}, {1, 4}}] paradox2[list_] := Partition[Riffle[list[[1]], #], 2] & /@ Drop[list, 1] RM[list_] := FoldList[Transpose[{First@li...

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...