Skip to main content

programming - Efficient code for the Ten True Sentences puzzle


I am trying to solve Ten True Sentences Puzzle.



Take a look at the following sentences:




  • The number of times the digit 0 appears in this puzzle is _.

  • The number of times the digit 1 appears in this puzzle is _.

  • The number of times the digit 2 appears in this puzzle is _.

  • The number of times the digit 3 appears in this puzzle is _.

  • The number of times the digit 4 appears in this puzzle is _.

  • The number of times the digit 5 appears in this puzzle is _.

  • The number of times the digit 6 appears in this puzzle is _.

  • The number of times the digit 7 appears in this puzzle is _.

  • The number of times the digit 8 appears in this puzzle is _.

  • The number of times the digit 9 appears in this puzzle is _.



Fill these sentences with digits such that all the sentences holds true.



I wrote the following code, but it didn't work.


Do[
  If[Tally[Range[0, 9] ~Join~ x][[All, 2]] == x, Print@x],
  {x, Tuples[Range[0, 9], 10]}] // AbsoluteTiming

How can I imporve my code?


Updated



Compile[{},
   NestWhile[Join[{1, 7, 3, 2}, RandomInteger[10, 6]] &, Range[0,9], 
      Tally[Range[0, 9] ~Join~ #][[All, 2]] != # &], 
   CompilationTarget -> "C", RuntimeOptions -> "Speed"
   ][] // AbsoluteTiming

Answer



Since the finished puzzle will contain exactly 20 numbers, we can assert that the solution for x will satisfy Total[x] == 20. We can therefore consider the IntegerPartitions of 20, which are of length 10, and limited to the numbers 1-9:


parts = IntegerPartitions[20, {10}, Range[1, 9]];

The solution for x must be a permutation of one of these, so the complete candidate set for x is:



can = Flatten[Permutations /@ parts, 1];

There are 92278 of these, sufficiently few to use the OP's code straight away. However, we can also note that the solution must satisfy (x-1).Range[0,9] == 20, so we can further reduce the candidate set:


can = can[[Flatten@Position[(can - 1).Range[0, 9], 20]]];

This leaves just 391 possibilities for x, making the OP's code very fast:


Do[If[Tally[Range[0, 9]~Join~x][[All, 2]] == x, Print@x], {x, can}]
(*  {1,7,3,2,1,1,1,2,1,1}  *)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Adding a thick curve to a regionplot

Suppose we have the following simple RegionPlot: f[x_] := 1 - x^2 g[x_] := 1 - 0.5 x^2 RegionPlot[{y < f[x], f[x] < y < g[x], y > g[x]}, {x, 0, 2}, {y, 0, 2}] Now I'm trying to change the curve defined by $y=g[x]$ into a thick black curve, while leaving all other boundaries in the plot unchanged. I've tried adding the region $y=g[x]$ and playing with the plotstyle, which didn't work, and I've tried BoundaryStyle, which changed all the boundaries in the plot. Now I'm kinda out of ideas... Any help would be appreciated! Answer With f[x_] := 1 - x^2 g[x_] := 1 - 0.5 x^2 You can use Epilog to add the thick line: RegionPlot[{y < f[x], f[x] < y < g[x], y > g[x]}, {x, 0, 2}, {y, 0, 2}, PlotPoints -> 50, Epilog -> (Plot[g[x], {x, 0, 2}, PlotStyle -> {Black, Thick}][[1]]), PlotStyle -> {Directive[Yellow, Opacity[0.4]], Directive[Pink, Opacity[0.4]],
Post a Comment
Read more