Skip to main content

evaluation - Scheduled tasks and dynamic updating


Here is an example:


x = 0; Dynamic[x]

now please run:


SessionSubmit[x = 1; Pause[10];]


Problems:




  • Annoying one: Dynamic[x] is not updated before Pause is finished




  • Serious one: if Pause or whatever that follows x=1 is longer than DynamicEvaluationTimeout (6sec) then the FrontEnd will become unresponsive.


    This means that by doing a very standard thing and not requiring any fancy result you will get your FE stuck just because you modified a tracked variable within a scheduled task.





Diagnosis:


It looks like scheduled evaluations are or behave as wrapped with PreemptProtect.


One can see via LinkSnooper that soon after x=1 the Kernel tells the FrontEnd to update dynamic object. FrontEnd, using preemptive link, asks for the content of Dynamic[x] but the response is delayed till pause is finished. That delay is what causes problems.


One should note that in case x=1;Pause[10] evaluated as a normal code line it does not happen because preemptive link calculations can interrupt main link calculations. There is no documentation about what should happen when the long calculation is initiated from a scheduled task as opposed to a main link request.


Questions:




  • is that behavior expected? (not being able to interrupt a scheduled task)





  • is there a workaround? For simple cases one could do SessionSubmit[x = 1; SessionSubmit@Pause[10];] but that does not scale at all.




  • at the end I could live with waiting till whole task is finished but I can not accept that the FrontEnd stalls. To prevent it I'd need to make x=1 not to trigger updating at all till the scheduled evaluation is finished. That way FE won't ask back to early and won't get stuck.





Answer





  • is that behavior expected? (not being able to interrupt a scheduled task)




Yes, as ihojnicki reminded us: sheduled tasks are preemptive.




  • is there a workaround?



There is a workaround I am using for some time so I decided to share it.


The problem appears in a notebook based FrontEnd with Dynamic interactivity enabled, fortunately because the workaround requires being able to launch dialogs and use Dynamics.



The solution is the same as here 112332. Instead of a scheduled evaluation we schedule a launch of a dialog which will trigger a main link evaluation of a desired procedure.


Here is a function:


MainLinkSubmit::usage = "MainLinkKSubmit[procedure] allows you to submit a non preemptive call from a preemptive one "<>
"(e.g. from scheduled task). Notebooks based front end environment is required.";

MainLinkSubmit // Attributes = {HoldAll};

MainLinkSubmit[procedure_] /; TrueQ @ $Notebooks := MessageDialog[
Dynamic[
NotebookClose[]; procedure

, SynchronousUpdating->False
]
, CellContext -> $
Context
, Visible -> False
];

And here is an example:


x = 0; Dynamic[x]



SessionSubmit @ ScheduledTask[
MainLinkSubmit[x = 1; Pause[1]; x = 2; Pause[1]; x = 3]
, {2}
]

FYI, this function is included in a prototype of my utilities package: https://github.com/kubaPod/Meh


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....