Skip to main content

syntax - HoldForm[Operator ##] on some list


Recently in response to this question Mr.Wizard suggested an unusual way to summing numbers. This doesn't seem to be documented.


HoldForm[+##] & @@ RandomInteger[100, 2]

This works fine for Plus and in case of - it generates -ive of product of list elements. I could not find out how to write a close variation of this for Divide or Subtract or other operations.


Can someone please shed some light on this ?



Answer




From prior comments I know that you are interested in forms such as:


a - b - c - d
a / b / c / d

There is no simple short form for these as there is for Plus. To understand this you must understand how Mathematica parses and displays these expressions. Let's look at the first one:


Subtract


HoldForm[a - b - c - d]


a - b - c - d


No surprises. But now FullForm:


HoldForm @ FullForm[a - b - c - d]


Plus[a, Times[-1, b], Times[-1, c], Times[-1, d]]

So our simple expression is not quite so simple in the internal format. Each negative term is actually represented as Times[-1, x]. But what about Box form? This is what is sent to the Front End for display:


HoldForm[a - b - c - d] // ToBoxes



TagBox[RowBox[{"a", "-", "b", "-", "c", "-", "d"}], HoldForm]

We will need a helper utility(1) to see what the Front End sends to the Kernel:


parseString[s_String, prep : (True | False) : True] := 
FrontEndExecute[UndocumentedTestFEParserPacket[s, prep]]

Now:


"a-b-c-d" // parseString



{BoxData[RowBox[{"a", "-", "b", "-", "c", "-", "d"}]], StandardForm}

Divide


The same analysis of the division/fraction case:


HoldForm[a/b/c/d]


a/((b c) d)


This time you may get a bit of a surprise. Let's look at the FullForm:


HoldForm @ FullForm[a/b/c/d]


Times[Times[Times[a, Power[b, -1]], Power[c, -1]], Power[d, -1]]

Once again we see that there is no "division" operator, but rather denominators are represented as Power[x, -1]. Why though is this displayed as a/((b c) d)? Let's look at the box form sent to the Front End:


HoldForm[a/b/c/d] // ToBoxes



TagBox[FractionBox["a", 
RowBox[{RowBox[{"(", RowBox[{"b", " ", "c"}], ")"}], " ", "d"}]], HoldForm]

So our Times/Power expression is converted to this different format during Box conversion even though the internal format contains no "fraction" head. This Box formatting is not prevented by the Hold function. See Returning an unevaluated expression with values substituted in for another example of this.


What about the input format however? Clearly a/b/c/d can be displayed by the Front End as you can simply type that in. What is its Box form?


"a/b/c/d" // parseString


{BoxData[RowBox[{RowBox[{RowBox[{"a", "/", "b"}], "/", "c"}], "/", "d"}]], StandardForm}


Input Syntax


By now you are probably understanding what I meant when I said "it's complicated." You may also see that there is a difference between inputting the equivalent expression, which may be displayed differently, e.g. a/((b c) d), and having Mathematica display a certain form such as a/b/c/d. We can explore both.


Taking things in reverse order, we can use Row to merely display an expression:


Row[{a, b, c, d}, "-"]
Row[{a, b, c, d}, "/"]


a-b-c-d

a/b/c/d


This is not meaningful mathematical input. It is only a display form. Also it is not "intelligent" about mathematical formatting such as negatives:


Row[{a, -b, c, d}, "-"]  (* note -b *)


a--b-c-d

This was the motivation for using e.g. HoldForm[+##] rather than Row in the first place: we wanted the automatic formatting, just not the automatic evaluation.


If you desire a shorthand for entering a valid mathematical expression you could negate after in the case of subtraction:


-+## &[a, -b, c, d]



-a + b - c - d

You'll note this also negates the first term. It isn't clear to me if you want this or not; you could use # - +##2 & if you do not.


For formatting purposes this won't work:


HoldForm[-+##] &[1, -2, 3, 4]


-(1 - 2 + 3 + 4)


You would instead need to negate the terms first:


HoldForm[+##] & @@ -{##} &[1, -2, 3, 4]


-1 + 2 - 3 - 4

Division will not display as a/b/c/d anyway, as already demonstrated, so you are probably better off using Row for that display format. (Or building Box form directly, though I'd rather not make this answer any longer to show how.) For inputting a valid mathematical expression you could use:


#/(1 ##2) &[a, b, c, d]



a/(b c d)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...