Skip to main content

syntax - HoldForm[Operator ##] on some list


Recently in response to this question Mr.Wizard suggested an unusual way to summing numbers. This doesn't seem to be documented.


HoldForm[+##] & @@ RandomInteger[100, 2]

This works fine for Plus and in case of - it generates -ive of product of list elements. I could not find out how to write a close variation of this for Divide or Subtract or other operations.


Can someone please shed some light on this ?



Answer




From prior comments I know that you are interested in forms such as:


a - b - c - d
a / b / c / d

There is no simple short form for these as there is for Plus. To understand this you must understand how Mathematica parses and displays these expressions. Let's look at the first one:


Subtract


HoldForm[a - b - c - d]


a - b - c - d


No surprises. But now FullForm:


HoldForm @ FullForm[a - b - c - d]


Plus[a, Times[-1, b], Times[-1, c], Times[-1, d]]

So our simple expression is not quite so simple in the internal format. Each negative term is actually represented as Times[-1, x]. But what about Box form? This is what is sent to the Front End for display:


HoldForm[a - b - c - d] // ToBoxes



TagBox[RowBox[{"a", "-", "b", "-", "c", "-", "d"}], HoldForm]

We will need a helper utility(1) to see what the Front End sends to the Kernel:


parseString[s_String, prep : (True | False) : True] := 
FrontEndExecute[UndocumentedTestFEParserPacket[s, prep]]

Now:


"a-b-c-d" // parseString



{BoxData[RowBox[{"a", "-", "b", "-", "c", "-", "d"}]], StandardForm}

Divide


The same analysis of the division/fraction case:


HoldForm[a/b/c/d]


a/((b c) d)


This time you may get a bit of a surprise. Let's look at the FullForm:


HoldForm @ FullForm[a/b/c/d]


Times[Times[Times[a, Power[b, -1]], Power[c, -1]], Power[d, -1]]

Once again we see that there is no "division" operator, but rather denominators are represented as Power[x, -1]. Why though is this displayed as a/((b c) d)? Let's look at the box form sent to the Front End:


HoldForm[a/b/c/d] // ToBoxes



TagBox[FractionBox["a", 
RowBox[{RowBox[{"(", RowBox[{"b", " ", "c"}], ")"}], " ", "d"}]], HoldForm]

So our Times/Power expression is converted to this different format during Box conversion even though the internal format contains no "fraction" head. This Box formatting is not prevented by the Hold function. See Returning an unevaluated expression with values substituted in for another example of this.


What about the input format however? Clearly a/b/c/d can be displayed by the Front End as you can simply type that in. What is its Box form?


"a/b/c/d" // parseString


{BoxData[RowBox[{RowBox[{RowBox[{"a", "/", "b"}], "/", "c"}], "/", "d"}]], StandardForm}


Input Syntax


By now you are probably understanding what I meant when I said "it's complicated." You may also see that there is a difference between inputting the equivalent expression, which may be displayed differently, e.g. a/((b c) d), and having Mathematica display a certain form such as a/b/c/d. We can explore both.


Taking things in reverse order, we can use Row to merely display an expression:


Row[{a, b, c, d}, "-"]
Row[{a, b, c, d}, "/"]


a-b-c-d

a/b/c/d


This is not meaningful mathematical input. It is only a display form. Also it is not "intelligent" about mathematical formatting such as negatives:


Row[{a, -b, c, d}, "-"]  (* note -b *)


a--b-c-d

This was the motivation for using e.g. HoldForm[+##] rather than Row in the first place: we wanted the automatic formatting, just not the automatic evaluation.


If you desire a shorthand for entering a valid mathematical expression you could negate after in the case of subtraction:


-+## &[a, -b, c, d]



-a + b - c - d

You'll note this also negates the first term. It isn't clear to me if you want this or not; you could use # - +##2 & if you do not.


For formatting purposes this won't work:


HoldForm[-+##] &[1, -2, 3, 4]


-(1 - 2 + 3 + 4)


You would instead need to negate the terms first:


HoldForm[+##] & @@ -{##} &[1, -2, 3, 4]


-1 + 2 - 3 - 4

Division will not display as a/b/c/d anyway, as already demonstrated, so you are probably better off using Row for that display format. (Or building Box form directly, though I'd rather not make this answer any longer to show how.) For inputting a valid mathematical expression you could use:


#/(1 ##2) &[a, b, c, d]



a/(b c d)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....