Skip to main content

modeling - Modelling the effect of a structure on a "tsunami" (hyperbolic wave equation)


So, the hyperbolic wave equation can be quite easily solved in Mathematica like this:


L = 5; 
TMax = 10;
tsunamiEqn =
u /. NDSolve[{
D[u[t, x, y], t, t] == D[u[t, x, y], x, x] + D[u[t, x, y], y, y],
u[0, x, y] == 0.15/E^(x^2 + y^2),

Derivative[1, 0, 0][u][0, x, y] == 0,
u[t, -L, y] == u[t, L, y],
u[t, x, -L] == u[t, x, L]},
u, {t, 0, TMax}, {x, -L, L}, {y, -L, L}][[1]];

One can then plot it or Manipulate it via the following snippet:


Manipulate[
Plot3D[
tsunamiEqn[fac TMax, x, y], {x, -L, L}, {y, -L, L},
PlotRange -> {{-L, L}, {-L, L}, {-0.1, 0.2}},

Mesh -> 10,
PlotStyle -> {LightBlue, Specularity[White, 50]}
],
{fac, 0, 0.9}
]

Now my question is:


How do I include a structure inside this "pond". I would like to see what happens when the wave interacts with a square block or so.


I am drawing a blank right now as to how I would want to include that: A boundary condition? (would seem a little complex)


Here are a few snapshots of this wave travelling: Time=0



Time=0.2 TMax


Time=0.3 TMax



Answer



In the scalar approximation, the obstacle could be modeled by an abrupt change in the wave speed $c$. This speed is unity in your original calculation, and I'm just going to insert its inverse square as a prefactor in front of the second time derivative.


The spatial shape is defined as an elongated box using Boole:


tsunamiEqn = 
u /. NDSolve[{(1/(1 - 0.98*Boole[Abs[x - 3.5] < 1 && Abs[y] < 2]))*
D[u[t, x, y], t, t] ==
D[u[t, x, y], x, x] + D[u[t, x, y], y, y],
u[0, x, y] == 0.15 Exp[-(x^2 + y^2)],

Derivative[1, 0, 0][u][0, x, y] == 0, u[t, -L, y] == u[t, L, y],
u[t, x, -L] == u[t, x, L]},
u, {t, 0, TMax}, {x, -L, L}, {y, -L, L}][[1]];

Now there is a warning because I enlarged the spatial domain without changing the precision or method options, just so I can see the reflection before the waves hit the boundary:


l = Table[
Plot3D[tsunamiEqn[fac TMax, x, y], {x, -L, L}, {y, -L, L},
PlotRange -> {{-L, L}, {-L, L}, {-0.1, 0.2}}, Mesh -> 10,
PlotPoints -> 50,
PlotStyle -> {LightBlue, Specularity[White, 50]}], {fac, 0,

0.9, .09}];

ListAnimate[l]

wave


It's important to increase the number of plot points in the visualization, because the default is too coarse to show the details of the wave properly.


You may also want to manually select a different method, e.g. as I did in this answer, to avoid the warning message in NDSolve.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...