Skip to main content

modeling - Modelling the effect of a structure on a "tsunami" (hyperbolic wave equation)


So, the hyperbolic wave equation can be quite easily solved in Mathematica like this:


L = 5; 
TMax = 10;
tsunamiEqn =
u /. NDSolve[{
D[u[t, x, y], t, t] == D[u[t, x, y], x, x] + D[u[t, x, y], y, y],
u[0, x, y] == 0.15/E^(x^2 + y^2),

Derivative[1, 0, 0][u][0, x, y] == 0,
u[t, -L, y] == u[t, L, y],
u[t, x, -L] == u[t, x, L]},
u, {t, 0, TMax}, {x, -L, L}, {y, -L, L}][[1]];

One can then plot it or Manipulate it via the following snippet:


Manipulate[
Plot3D[
tsunamiEqn[fac TMax, x, y], {x, -L, L}, {y, -L, L},
PlotRange -> {{-L, L}, {-L, L}, {-0.1, 0.2}},

Mesh -> 10,
PlotStyle -> {LightBlue, Specularity[White, 50]}
],
{fac, 0, 0.9}
]

Now my question is:


How do I include a structure inside this "pond". I would like to see what happens when the wave interacts with a square block or so.


I am drawing a blank right now as to how I would want to include that: A boundary condition? (would seem a little complex)


Here are a few snapshots of this wave travelling: Time=0



Time=0.2 TMax


Time=0.3 TMax



Answer



In the scalar approximation, the obstacle could be modeled by an abrupt change in the wave speed $c$. This speed is unity in your original calculation, and I'm just going to insert its inverse square as a prefactor in front of the second time derivative.


The spatial shape is defined as an elongated box using Boole:


tsunamiEqn = 
u /. NDSolve[{(1/(1 - 0.98*Boole[Abs[x - 3.5] < 1 && Abs[y] < 2]))*
D[u[t, x, y], t, t] ==
D[u[t, x, y], x, x] + D[u[t, x, y], y, y],
u[0, x, y] == 0.15 Exp[-(x^2 + y^2)],

Derivative[1, 0, 0][u][0, x, y] == 0, u[t, -L, y] == u[t, L, y],
u[t, x, -L] == u[t, x, L]},
u, {t, 0, TMax}, {x, -L, L}, {y, -L, L}][[1]];

Now there is a warning because I enlarged the spatial domain without changing the precision or method options, just so I can see the reflection before the waves hit the boundary:


l = Table[
Plot3D[tsunamiEqn[fac TMax, x, y], {x, -L, L}, {y, -L, L},
PlotRange -> {{-L, L}, {-L, L}, {-0.1, 0.2}}, Mesh -> 10,
PlotPoints -> 50,
PlotStyle -> {LightBlue, Specularity[White, 50]}], {fac, 0,

0.9, .09}];

ListAnimate[l]

wave


It's important to increase the number of plot points in the visualization, because the default is too coarse to show the details of the wave properly.


You may also want to manually select a different method, e.g. as I did in this answer, to avoid the warning message in NDSolve.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....