Skip to main content

modeling - Modelling the effect of a structure on a "tsunami" (hyperbolic wave equation)


So, the hyperbolic wave equation can be quite easily solved in Mathematica like this:


L = 5; 
TMax = 10;
tsunamiEqn =
u /. NDSolve[{
D[u[t, x, y], t, t] == D[u[t, x, y], x, x] + D[u[t, x, y], y, y],
u[0, x, y] == 0.15/E^(x^2 + y^2),

Derivative[1, 0, 0][u][0, x, y] == 0,
u[t, -L, y] == u[t, L, y],
u[t, x, -L] == u[t, x, L]},
u, {t, 0, TMax}, {x, -L, L}, {y, -L, L}][[1]];

One can then plot it or Manipulate it via the following snippet:


Manipulate[
Plot3D[
tsunamiEqn[fac TMax, x, y], {x, -L, L}, {y, -L, L},
PlotRange -> {{-L, L}, {-L, L}, {-0.1, 0.2}},

Mesh -> 10,
PlotStyle -> {LightBlue, Specularity[White, 50]}
],
{fac, 0, 0.9}
]

Now my question is:


How do I include a structure inside this "pond". I would like to see what happens when the wave interacts with a square block or so.


I am drawing a blank right now as to how I would want to include that: A boundary condition? (would seem a little complex)


Here are a few snapshots of this wave travelling: Time=0



Time=0.2 TMax


Time=0.3 TMax



Answer



In the scalar approximation, the obstacle could be modeled by an abrupt change in the wave speed $c$. This speed is unity in your original calculation, and I'm just going to insert its inverse square as a prefactor in front of the second time derivative.


The spatial shape is defined as an elongated box using Boole:


tsunamiEqn = 
u /. NDSolve[{(1/(1 - 0.98*Boole[Abs[x - 3.5] < 1 && Abs[y] < 2]))*
D[u[t, x, y], t, t] ==
D[u[t, x, y], x, x] + D[u[t, x, y], y, y],
u[0, x, y] == 0.15 Exp[-(x^2 + y^2)],

Derivative[1, 0, 0][u][0, x, y] == 0, u[t, -L, y] == u[t, L, y],
u[t, x, -L] == u[t, x, L]},
u, {t, 0, TMax}, {x, -L, L}, {y, -L, L}][[1]];

Now there is a warning because I enlarged the spatial domain without changing the precision or method options, just so I can see the reflection before the waves hit the boundary:


l = Table[
Plot3D[tsunamiEqn[fac TMax, x, y], {x, -L, L}, {y, -L, L},
PlotRange -> {{-L, L}, {-L, L}, {-0.1, 0.2}}, Mesh -> 10,
PlotPoints -> 50,
PlotStyle -> {LightBlue, Specularity[White, 50]}], {fac, 0,

0.9, .09}];

ListAnimate[l]

wave


It's important to increase the number of plot points in the visualization, because the default is too coarse to show the details of the wave properly.


You may also want to manually select a different method, e.g. as I did in this answer, to avoid the warning message in NDSolve.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...

plotting - How to draw some 2D curves in a 3D plot?

I want to plot several 2D curves ( Sin[x] at y=0 , Cos[x] at y=1 ) in a 3D plot, what function should i use? f[x_, y_] := Piecewise[{{0, y 0}, {Sin[x], y == 0}}] g[x_, y_] := Piecewise[{{0, y 1}, {Cos[x], y == 1}}] Plot3D[{f[x, y], g[x, y]}, {x, 0, 10}, {y, 0, 10}] doesn't work. Any ideas? Answer ParametricPlot3D[{{Sin[u], 0, u}, {Cos[u], 1, u}}, {u, 0, 20}, BoxRatios -> 1, PlotRange -> {{-2, 2}, {-.5, 2}, {0, 20}}] === update - general thoughts === I've seen the comments to this question and a few other approaches to the waterfall (or wire) plot are given in this question: Plotting several functions . Also I cannot not mention one of my favorite Mathematica blogs - Archery with this post on the story of discovery of 1st pulsar and an its infamous graphics - code is given in the post: