Skip to main content

modeling - Modelling the effect of a structure on a "tsunami" (hyperbolic wave equation)


So, the hyperbolic wave equation can be quite easily solved in Mathematica like this:


L = 5; 
TMax = 10;
tsunamiEqn =
u /. NDSolve[{
D[u[t, x, y], t, t] == D[u[t, x, y], x, x] + D[u[t, x, y], y, y],
u[0, x, y] == 0.15/E^(x^2 + y^2),

Derivative[1, 0, 0][u][0, x, y] == 0,
u[t, -L, y] == u[t, L, y],
u[t, x, -L] == u[t, x, L]},
u, {t, 0, TMax}, {x, -L, L}, {y, -L, L}][[1]];

One can then plot it or Manipulate it via the following snippet:


Manipulate[
Plot3D[
tsunamiEqn[fac TMax, x, y], {x, -L, L}, {y, -L, L},
PlotRange -> {{-L, L}, {-L, L}, {-0.1, 0.2}},

Mesh -> 10,
PlotStyle -> {LightBlue, Specularity[White, 50]}
],
{fac, 0, 0.9}
]

Now my question is:


How do I include a structure inside this "pond". I would like to see what happens when the wave interacts with a square block or so.


I am drawing a blank right now as to how I would want to include that: A boundary condition? (would seem a little complex)


Here are a few snapshots of this wave travelling: Time=0



Time=0.2 TMax


Time=0.3 TMax



Answer



In the scalar approximation, the obstacle could be modeled by an abrupt change in the wave speed $c$. This speed is unity in your original calculation, and I'm just going to insert its inverse square as a prefactor in front of the second time derivative.


The spatial shape is defined as an elongated box using Boole:


tsunamiEqn = 
u /. NDSolve[{(1/(1 - 0.98*Boole[Abs[x - 3.5] < 1 && Abs[y] < 2]))*
D[u[t, x, y], t, t] ==
D[u[t, x, y], x, x] + D[u[t, x, y], y, y],
u[0, x, y] == 0.15 Exp[-(x^2 + y^2)],

Derivative[1, 0, 0][u][0, x, y] == 0, u[t, -L, y] == u[t, L, y],
u[t, x, -L] == u[t, x, L]},
u, {t, 0, TMax}, {x, -L, L}, {y, -L, L}][[1]];

Now there is a warning because I enlarged the spatial domain without changing the precision or method options, just so I can see the reflection before the waves hit the boundary:


l = Table[
Plot3D[tsunamiEqn[fac TMax, x, y], {x, -L, L}, {y, -L, L},
PlotRange -> {{-L, L}, {-L, L}, {-0.1, 0.2}}, Mesh -> 10,
PlotPoints -> 50,
PlotStyle -> {LightBlue, Specularity[White, 50]}], {fac, 0,

0.9, .09}];

ListAnimate[l]

wave


It's important to increase the number of plot points in the visualization, because the default is too coarse to show the details of the wave properly.


You may also want to manually select a different method, e.g. as I did in this answer, to avoid the warning message in NDSolve.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...