Skip to main content

time series - EventSeries v. TimeSeries


I have what technically should be an event series, spike times of a neuron. Here's a subset of the spiking data -


st = {2.60661, 4.39836, 5.01687, 6.09621, 6.62883, 6.93686, 7.31116, 8.14444, 8.56538, 9.11395}

If I whip this into a TimeSeries then I can easily Accumulate[] them to yield a counting function like so:


spikeData = TimeSeries[Table[1,Length[st]],{st}];
accSpikeData = Accumulate[spikeData];
Row[{ListPlot[spikeData, Filling -> Bottom],ListPlot[accSpikeData, Filling -> Bottom]}]


Mathematica graphics


But- If I do the same thing with an EventSeries instead...


spikeData = EventSeries[Table[1, Length[st]], {st}];
accSpikeData = Accumulate[spikeData];
Row[{ListPlot[spikeData, Filling -> Bottom], ListPlot[accSpikeData, Filling -> Bottom]}]

Mathematica graphics


And, indeed, looking at the data-


accSpikeData["Path"]
(* {{2.60661, 1}, {4.39836, Missing[]}, {5.01687, Missing[]}, {6.09621,

Missing[]}, {6.62883, Missing[]}, {6.93686, Missing[]}, {7.31116,
Missing[]}, {8.14444, Missing[]}, {8.56538, Missing[]}} *)

I'm not sure if this is a bug or 'intended behavior'. As I understand EventSeries it is simply a non-interpolating version of TimeSeries, and, of course I can do what I need here with a TimeSeries but was just wondering why even having EventSeries is a thing.



Answer



This is intended behaviour and here is why. Accumulate on TimeSeries or on EventSeries assumes that it accumulates according to every regular step on times. So in case of irregularly sampled TimeSeries it interpolates and in case of irregularly sampled EventSeries it creates Missing[] values. Examples:


In[41]:= data = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
Accumulate[data]

Out[42]= {1, 3, 6, 10, 15}


Create a TimeSeries with irregular time stamps:


In[43]:= ts1 = TimeSeries[data, {{1, 1.5, 3, 3.5, 4}}];

Now Accumulate will cause the values to be interpolated automatically:


In[44]:= Accumulate[ts1]["Path"]

Out[44]= {{1., 1.}, {1.5, 3.}, {3., 11.}, {3.5, 15.}, {4., 20.}}

This is coming from subsampling ts11:



In[49]:= ts11 = TimeSeriesResample[ts1];
Accumulate[ts11]["Path"]

Out[50]= {{1., 1.}, {1.5, 3.}, {2., 5.33333}, {2.5, 8.}, {3., 11.}, {3.5, 15.}, {4., 20.}}

Compare to accumulating the values of ts1 directly:


In[46]:= Accumulate[ts1["Values"]]

Out[46]= {1, 3, 6, 10, 15}


Create another TimeSeries forcing the irregular time stamps to be treated as sequentially regular:


In[47]:= ts2 = TimeSeries[data, {{1, 1.5, 3, 3.5, 4}}, TemporalRegularity -> True];

Now accumulating ts2 gives the expected answer equivalent to accumulating the original data:


In[48]:= Accumulate[ts2]["Values"]

Out[48]= {1, 3, 6, 10, 15}

EventSeries does not interpolate automatically hence Accumulate chokes on Missing[] and gives red flag that something is off. What you need is to Accumulate the values directly or set TemporalRegularity to True upon (re)construction.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Adding a thick curve to a regionplot

Suppose we have the following simple RegionPlot: f[x_] := 1 - x^2 g[x_] := 1 - 0.5 x^2 RegionPlot[{y < f[x], f[x] < y < g[x], y > g[x]}, {x, 0, 2}, {y, 0, 2}] Now I'm trying to change the curve defined by $y=g[x]$ into a thick black curve, while leaving all other boundaries in the plot unchanged. I've tried adding the region $y=g[x]$ and playing with the plotstyle, which didn't work, and I've tried BoundaryStyle, which changed all the boundaries in the plot. Now I'm kinda out of ideas... Any help would be appreciated! Answer With f[x_] := 1 - x^2 g[x_] := 1 - 0.5 x^2 You can use Epilog to add the thick line: RegionPlot[{y < f[x], f[x] < y < g[x], y > g[x]}, {x, 0, 2}, {y, 0, 2}, PlotPoints -> 50, Epilog -> (Plot[g[x], {x, 0, 2}, PlotStyle -> {Black, Thick}][[1]]), PlotStyle -> {Directive[Yellow, Opacity[0.4]], Directive[Pink, Opacity[0.4]],