Skip to main content

time series - EventSeries v. TimeSeries


I have what technically should be an event series, spike times of a neuron. Here's a subset of the spiking data -


st = {2.60661, 4.39836, 5.01687, 6.09621, 6.62883, 6.93686, 7.31116, 8.14444, 8.56538, 9.11395}

If I whip this into a TimeSeries then I can easily Accumulate[] them to yield a counting function like so:


spikeData = TimeSeries[Table[1,Length[st]],{st}];
accSpikeData = Accumulate[spikeData];
Row[{ListPlot[spikeData, Filling -> Bottom],ListPlot[accSpikeData, Filling -> Bottom]}]


Mathematica graphics


But- If I do the same thing with an EventSeries instead...


spikeData = EventSeries[Table[1, Length[st]], {st}];
accSpikeData = Accumulate[spikeData];
Row[{ListPlot[spikeData, Filling -> Bottom], ListPlot[accSpikeData, Filling -> Bottom]}]

Mathematica graphics


And, indeed, looking at the data-


accSpikeData["Path"]
(* {{2.60661, 1}, {4.39836, Missing[]}, {5.01687, Missing[]}, {6.09621,

Missing[]}, {6.62883, Missing[]}, {6.93686, Missing[]}, {7.31116,
Missing[]}, {8.14444, Missing[]}, {8.56538, Missing[]}} *)

I'm not sure if this is a bug or 'intended behavior'. As I understand EventSeries it is simply a non-interpolating version of TimeSeries, and, of course I can do what I need here with a TimeSeries but was just wondering why even having EventSeries is a thing.



Answer



This is intended behaviour and here is why. Accumulate on TimeSeries or on EventSeries assumes that it accumulates according to every regular step on times. So in case of irregularly sampled TimeSeries it interpolates and in case of irregularly sampled EventSeries it creates Missing[] values. Examples:


In[41]:= data = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
Accumulate[data]

Out[42]= {1, 3, 6, 10, 15}


Create a TimeSeries with irregular time stamps:


In[43]:= ts1 = TimeSeries[data, {{1, 1.5, 3, 3.5, 4}}];

Now Accumulate will cause the values to be interpolated automatically:


In[44]:= Accumulate[ts1]["Path"]

Out[44]= {{1., 1.}, {1.5, 3.}, {3., 11.}, {3.5, 15.}, {4., 20.}}

This is coming from subsampling ts11:



In[49]:= ts11 = TimeSeriesResample[ts1];
Accumulate[ts11]["Path"]

Out[50]= {{1., 1.}, {1.5, 3.}, {2., 5.33333}, {2.5, 8.}, {3., 11.}, {3.5, 15.}, {4., 20.}}

Compare to accumulating the values of ts1 directly:


In[46]:= Accumulate[ts1["Values"]]

Out[46]= {1, 3, 6, 10, 15}


Create another TimeSeries forcing the irregular time stamps to be treated as sequentially regular:


In[47]:= ts2 = TimeSeries[data, {{1, 1.5, 3, 3.5, 4}}, TemporalRegularity -> True];

Now accumulating ts2 gives the expected answer equivalent to accumulating the original data:


In[48]:= Accumulate[ts2]["Values"]

Out[48]= {1, 3, 6, 10, 15}

EventSeries does not interpolate automatically hence Accumulate chokes on Missing[] and gives red flag that something is off. What you need is to Accumulate the values directly or set TemporalRegularity to True upon (re)construction.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...