Skip to main content

Using the value of the variable in the definition of the function



How do I take the current value of n in the second line in order for the answers to be the same in both cases?


n = 2;
f[x_] := x/n;

Print[f[8]];
n = 4;
Print[f[8]];

Now:


4
2

Want:


4

4

Basically, I want the function to be x/2 after my definition. (Please don't suggest defining it as x/2, I need to define a list of functions inside the cycle.)


UPDATE


The question I asked looks oversimplified, so suggested solutions do not really work for me. Here is a more realistic example.


I want to create a list of functions, each acting on a complicated argument:


ft = {};
For[n = 1, n <= 3, n++,
tmp[x_] := x[[1]]/n;
AppendTo[ft, tmp];

];
ft[[1]][{12, 1}]
ft[[2]][{12, 1}]
ft[[3]][{12, 1}]

The generated output is


3
3
3


The desired output is:


12
6
4

I cannot replace := with = since this produces an error.



Answer



First, it is much better to use Table to construct a list instead of using For and AppendTo. Second, in order to inject the value of n into your function definition, you need to use With. Finally, instead of defining tmp 3 times (so that each definition overrides the previous definition), you can define tmp[n] 3 times. Putting this together we have:


ft = Table[
With[{n=n},

tmp[n][x_] := x[[1]]/n;
tmp[n]
],
{n, 3}
]

ft[[1]][{12,1}]
ft[[2]][{12,1}]
ft[[3]][{12,1}]



{tmp[1], tmp[2], tmp[3]}


12


6


4



Address OP question


When you use SetDelayed, this means that the RHS is not evaluated when the definition is created. Example:


n=3;
f[x_] := x/n

DownValues[f]


{HoldPattern[f[x_]] :> x/n}



Notice how the definition has n instead of 3. In order to get the value of n inserted into your definition you need to use Set (although there are many cases where you can't use Set) or you need to use a method to insert the value of n, a common one being With:


With[{n = 3},
f[x_] := x/n
];
DownValues[f]



{HoldPattern[f[x$_]] :> x$/3}



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...