Skip to main content

plotting - How to not include data value outside plot range in the plot



Consider this list plot


ls = Table[Sin[t], {t, 0, 100, 0.1}];
p = ListPlot[ls, PlotRange -> {{0., 0.1}, All}, DataRange -> {0, 1}, Joined -> True]

enter image description here


If we look at the data in the plot, we see that all the data in ls are included in the plot.


ls2 = p[[1, 2, 1, 3, 3, 1]];
Dimensions[ls2]
(* {1001, 2} *)


ListPlot[ls2, Joined -> True]

enter image description here


Sometimes this is really helpful because we can just retrieve the data at a later time from the plots and don't need to regenerate the data again. But sometimes I'm only interested in the range set in the ListPlot, and saving all the data is kindly of wasting of space, especially when I have many plots in a notebook, the notebook size becomes very large and not very responsive.


So are there simple ways to tell ListPlot to not include the data outside the plot range, other than manually select the data before plot?


P.S. Sometimes, ListPlot does drop the data outside the range, see example here.



Answer



I think @rasher's comment is correct and you can plot the points you need by truncating the list. You can make a function that does that. I named mine (ironically) economicListPlot but it took a lot of copy-pasting to account for different values of the options so it could do with a tidy up


economicListPlot[data_ /; VectorQ[data], opts : OptionsPattern[ListPlot]] :=


 Module[{newopts, plotRange1, dataRange1, ind1, ind2},
  With[{
    plotRange = PlotRange /. FilterRules[{opts}, PlotRange], 
    dataRange = DataRange /. FilterRules[{opts}, DataRange]
    },
   If[dataRange === DataRange,



    If[plotRange === PlotRange || plotRange === All || plotRange === Automatic,


     ListPlot[data, Evaluate[opts]],(*no plotrange or datarange defined*)

     newopts = Sequence @@ Cases[{opts}, Except[HoldPattern[PlotRange -> _]]];
     plotRange1 = If[VectorQ@plotRange, plotRange, First@plotRange];
     ind1 = IntegerPart@Max[First@plotRange1, 1];
     ind2 = IntegerPart@Max[Last@plotRange1, 1];
     ListPlot[data[[ind1 ;; ind2]], 
      Evaluate@newopts, 
      PlotRange -> {Automatic, 

        Evaluate@
         Complement[ 
          plotRange, {plotRange1}]}(*plotrange defined only*)]
     ],


    If[plotRange === All || plotRange === Automatic,
     ListPlot[data, Evaluate[opts]],
     newopts = Sequence @@ Cases[{opts}, Except[HoldPattern[PlotRange -> _]]];
     newopts = Sequence @@ Cases[{newopts}, Except[HoldPattern[DataRange -> _]]];

     plotRange1 = If[VectorQ@plotRange, plotRange, First@plotRange];
     dataRange1 = If[VectorQ@dataRange, dataRange, First@dataRange];
     ind1 = Max[Ceiling[(plotRange1[[1]] - dataRange1[[1]])/
         Subtract @@ Reverse@dataRange1 (Length[data])], 1];
     ind2 = Min[Ceiling[
        ind1 + (Subtract @@ Reverse@plotRange1* (Length[data]))/
         Subtract @@ Reverse@dataRange1 ], Length[data]
       ];
     ListPlot[data[[ind1 ;; ind2]], Evaluate@newopts, 
      PlotRange -> {All, 

        Evaluate@Complement[ plotRange, {plotRange1}]}, 
      DataRange -> 
       Evaluate@
        plotRange1](*both plotrange and datarange defined*)
     ]
    ]
   ]
  ]

Anyhow, it does what you want:



    data = Table[Sin[t], {t, 0, 100, 0.1}];
p = ListPlot[data, PlotRange -> {{0., 0.1}, All}, DataRange -> {0, 1},
    Joined -> True];
p2 = economicListPlot[data, PlotRange -> {{0., 0.1}, All}, 
   DataRange -> {0, 1}, Joined -> True];

p2[[1, 2, 1, 3, 3, 1]] // Dimensions
(*{102 , 2}*)

p[[1, 2, 1, 3, 3, 1]] // Dimensions

(*{1001 , 2}*)

and the plots are the "same":


GraphicsRow[{p, p2}]

enter image description here


but if you go to wider plot/data ranges there is some difference (my index gymnastics are a little off) so I'd be cautious on how I'd use this:


Show[ListPlot[data, Joined -> True, PlotRange -> {{1.1, 1.3}, All}, 
  DataRange -> {0, 20}, PlotStyle -> Thickness[.01]], 
 economicListPlot[data, Joined -> True, 

  PlotRange -> {{1.1, 1.3}, All}, DataRange -> {0, 20}, 
  PlotStyle -> Orange]]

discrepancy


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.
Post a Comment
Read more