Skip to main content

plotting - How to not include data value outside plot range in the plot



Consider this list plot


ls = Table[Sin[t], {t, 0, 100, 0.1}];
p = ListPlot[ls, PlotRange -> {{0., 0.1}, All}, DataRange -> {0, 1}, Joined -> True]

enter image description here


If we look at the data in the plot, we see that all the data in ls are included in the plot.


ls2 = p[[1, 2, 1, 3, 3, 1]];
Dimensions[ls2]
(* {1001, 2} *)


ListPlot[ls2, Joined -> True]

enter image description here


Sometimes this is really helpful because we can just retrieve the data at a later time from the plots and don't need to regenerate the data again. But sometimes I'm only interested in the range set in the ListPlot, and saving all the data is kindly of wasting of space, especially when I have many plots in a notebook, the notebook size becomes very large and not very responsive.


So are there simple ways to tell ListPlot to not include the data outside the plot range, other than manually select the data before plot?


P.S. Sometimes, ListPlot does drop the data outside the range, see example here.



Answer



I think @rasher's comment is correct and you can plot the points you need by truncating the list. You can make a function that does that. I named mine (ironically) economicListPlot but it took a lot of copy-pasting to account for different values of the options so it could do with a tidy up


economicListPlot[data_ /; VectorQ[data], opts : OptionsPattern[ListPlot]] :=


 Module[{newopts, plotRange1, dataRange1, ind1, ind2},
  With[{
    plotRange = PlotRange /. FilterRules[{opts}, PlotRange], 
    dataRange = DataRange /. FilterRules[{opts}, DataRange]
    },
   If[dataRange === DataRange,



    If[plotRange === PlotRange || plotRange === All || plotRange === Automatic,


     ListPlot[data, Evaluate[opts]],(*no plotrange or datarange defined*)

     newopts = Sequence @@ Cases[{opts}, Except[HoldPattern[PlotRange -> _]]];
     plotRange1 = If[VectorQ@plotRange, plotRange, First@plotRange];
     ind1 = IntegerPart@Max[First@plotRange1, 1];
     ind2 = IntegerPart@Max[Last@plotRange1, 1];
     ListPlot[data[[ind1 ;; ind2]], 
      Evaluate@newopts, 
      PlotRange -> {Automatic, 

        Evaluate@
         Complement[ 
          plotRange, {plotRange1}]}(*plotrange defined only*)]
     ],


    If[plotRange === All || plotRange === Automatic,
     ListPlot[data, Evaluate[opts]],
     newopts = Sequence @@ Cases[{opts}, Except[HoldPattern[PlotRange -> _]]];
     newopts = Sequence @@ Cases[{newopts}, Except[HoldPattern[DataRange -> _]]];

     plotRange1 = If[VectorQ@plotRange, plotRange, First@plotRange];
     dataRange1 = If[VectorQ@dataRange, dataRange, First@dataRange];
     ind1 = Max[Ceiling[(plotRange1[[1]] - dataRange1[[1]])/
         Subtract @@ Reverse@dataRange1 (Length[data])], 1];
     ind2 = Min[Ceiling[
        ind1 + (Subtract @@ Reverse@plotRange1* (Length[data]))/
         Subtract @@ Reverse@dataRange1 ], Length[data]
       ];
     ListPlot[data[[ind1 ;; ind2]], Evaluate@newopts, 
      PlotRange -> {All, 

        Evaluate@Complement[ plotRange, {plotRange1}]}, 
      DataRange -> 
       Evaluate@
        plotRange1](*both plotrange and datarange defined*)
     ]
    ]
   ]
  ]

Anyhow, it does what you want:



    data = Table[Sin[t], {t, 0, 100, 0.1}];
p = ListPlot[data, PlotRange -> {{0., 0.1}, All}, DataRange -> {0, 1},
    Joined -> True];
p2 = economicListPlot[data, PlotRange -> {{0., 0.1}, All}, 
   DataRange -> {0, 1}, Joined -> True];

p2[[1, 2, 1, 3, 3, 1]] // Dimensions
(*{102 , 2}*)

p[[1, 2, 1, 3, 3, 1]] // Dimensions

(*{1001 , 2}*)

and the plots are the "same":


GraphicsRow[{p, p2}]

enter image description here


but if you go to wider plot/data ranges there is some difference (my index gymnastics are a little off) so I'd be cautious on how I'd use this:


Show[ListPlot[data, Joined -> True, PlotRange -> {{1.1, 1.3}, All}, 
  DataRange -> {0, 20}, PlotStyle -> Thickness[.01]], 
 economicListPlot[data, Joined -> True, 

  PlotRange -> {{1.1, 1.3}, All}, DataRange -> {0, 20}, 
  PlotStyle -> Orange]]

discrepancy


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more