Skip to main content

plotting - How to not include data value outside plot range in the plot



Consider this list plot


ls = Table[Sin[t], {t, 0, 100, 0.1}];
p = ListPlot[ls, PlotRange -> {{0., 0.1}, All}, DataRange -> {0, 1}, Joined -> True]

enter image description here


If we look at the data in the plot, we see that all the data in ls are included in the plot.


ls2 = p[[1, 2, 1, 3, 3, 1]];
Dimensions[ls2]
(* {1001, 2} *)


ListPlot[ls2, Joined -> True]

enter image description here


Sometimes this is really helpful because we can just retrieve the data at a later time from the plots and don't need to regenerate the data again. But sometimes I'm only interested in the range set in the ListPlot, and saving all the data is kindly of wasting of space, especially when I have many plots in a notebook, the notebook size becomes very large and not very responsive.


So are there simple ways to tell ListPlot to not include the data outside the plot range, other than manually select the data before plot?


P.S. Sometimes, ListPlot does drop the data outside the range, see example here.



Answer



I think @rasher's comment is correct and you can plot the points you need by truncating the list. You can make a function that does that. I named mine (ironically) economicListPlot but it took a lot of copy-pasting to account for different values of the options so it could do with a tidy up


economicListPlot[data_ /; VectorQ[data], opts : OptionsPattern[ListPlot]] :=


Module[{newopts, plotRange1, dataRange1, ind1, ind2},
With[{
plotRange = PlotRange /. FilterRules[{opts}, PlotRange],
dataRange = DataRange /. FilterRules[{opts}, DataRange]
},
If[dataRange === DataRange,



If[plotRange === PlotRange || plotRange === All || plotRange === Automatic,


ListPlot[data, Evaluate[opts]],(*no plotrange or datarange defined*)

newopts = Sequence @@ Cases[{opts}, Except[HoldPattern[PlotRange -> _]]];
plotRange1 = If[VectorQ@plotRange, plotRange, First@plotRange];
ind1 = IntegerPart@Max[First@plotRange1, 1];
ind2 = IntegerPart@Max[Last@plotRange1, 1];
ListPlot[data[[ind1 ;; ind2]],
Evaluate@newopts,
PlotRange -> {Automatic,

Evaluate@
Complement[
plotRange, {plotRange1}]}(*plotrange defined only*)]
],


If[plotRange === All || plotRange === Automatic,
ListPlot[data, Evaluate[opts]],
newopts = Sequence @@ Cases[{opts}, Except[HoldPattern[PlotRange -> _]]];
newopts = Sequence @@ Cases[{newopts}, Except[HoldPattern[DataRange -> _]]];

plotRange1 = If[VectorQ@plotRange, plotRange, First@plotRange];
dataRange1 = If[VectorQ@dataRange, dataRange, First@dataRange];
ind1 = Max[Ceiling[(plotRange1[[1]] - dataRange1[[1]])/
Subtract @@ Reverse@dataRange1 (Length[data])], 1];
ind2 = Min[Ceiling[
ind1 + (Subtract @@ Reverse@plotRange1* (Length[data]))/
Subtract @@ Reverse@dataRange1 ], Length[data]
];
ListPlot[data[[ind1 ;; ind2]], Evaluate@newopts,
PlotRange -> {All,

Evaluate@Complement[ plotRange, {plotRange1}]},
DataRange ->
Evaluate@
plotRange1](*both plotrange and datarange defined*)
]
]
]
]

Anyhow, it does what you want:



    data = Table[Sin[t], {t, 0, 100, 0.1}];
p = ListPlot[data, PlotRange -> {{0., 0.1}, All}, DataRange -> {0, 1},
Joined -> True];
p2 = economicListPlot[data, PlotRange -> {{0., 0.1}, All},
DataRange -> {0, 1}, Joined -> True];

p2[[1, 2, 1, 3, 3, 1]] // Dimensions
(*{102 , 2}*)

p[[1, 2, 1, 3, 3, 1]] // Dimensions

(*{1001 , 2}*)

and the plots are the "same":


GraphicsRow[{p, p2}]

enter image description here


but if you go to wider plot/data ranges there is some difference (my index gymnastics are a little off) so I'd be cautious on how I'd use this:


Show[ListPlot[data, Joined -> True, PlotRange -> {{1.1, 1.3}, All}, 
DataRange -> {0, 20}, PlotStyle -> Thickness[.01]],
economicListPlot[data, Joined -> True,

PlotRange -> {{1.1, 1.3}, All}, DataRange -> {0, 20},
PlotStyle -> Orange]]

discrepancy


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...