Skip to main content

fourier analysis - NFourierTransform of an interpolating function


I have an interpolating function called rs22 - a solution from NDSolve - which is defined from 0 to about 1 ms. rs22 is a function that reaches a non-zero equilibrium value. (only shown here up to 10ns)


NDSolve Solution of rs22



I would like to perform a Fourier transform on this function. I have written down a line of code to do this but it doesn't work at the moment.


Needs["FourierSeries`"](*Yup I have this in my code, thanks for reminding ;)*)

Plot[NFourierTransform[rs22, t, dw,
Method -> {"GlobalAdaptive", Method -> "LevinRule",
"SymbolicProcessing" -> 0}], {dw, -1*^9, 1*^9}, PlotRange -> All,
GridLines -> Automatic]

By definition a Fourier transform integrates from -inf to +inf. Is my interpolating function the problem since it is only defined up to 1ms?


I have also tried using NIntegrate instead but the solution changes with the total integration time which is something I don't want. But then again it seems sensible given the form of the product of the interpolating function and the exponential term: Exp(..)*rs22



xmin = -5*^9; xmax = 5*^9;
dwvec = DeleteCases[Table[dw, {dw, xmin, xmax, (xmax - xmin)/80}]];

output = ParallelTable[
{Δω = dwvec[[j]]
, popint =
NIntegrate[
Exp[I Δω t] rs[2, 2], {t, 0, 1*^-3}
, Method -> {"GlobalAdaptive", Method -> "LevinRule",
"SymbolicProcessing" -> 0}]}

, {j, 1, Length[dwvec]}];

I am at loss as to how to perform this calculation.



Answer



From one of my comments:



You could use Piecewise, something like the Fourier transform of Piecewise[{{r2ss, 0 < t < 10^-9}}, 0], or whatever domain instead of 0 < t < 10^-9 is appropriate.



That is, something like:


NFourierTransform[Piecewise[{{r2ss, 0 < t < 10^-9}}, 0], t, dw, 

Method -> {"GlobalAdaptive", Method -> "LevinRule",
"SymbolicProcessing" -> 0}]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...