Skip to main content

units - UnitConvert works despite wrong dimension - bug or feature?


I am surprised that there are some cases where unit conversion works, even if the input- and output dimensions are clearly different:


UnitConvert[Quantity[1., 1/"Meters"], "Centimeters"]
(* returns 0.01/cm *)

Also, the following (and many, more complicated inputs) work. It seems that when you have a compound unit at the input, and a single unit for the output, Mathematica only converts the specified "dimension" (length, time, ...) and any power of that dimension (length^n, ...):



UnitConvert[Quantity[1., "Amperes"/"Meters"], "Centimters"]
(* returns 0.01 A/cm *)
UnitConvert[Quantity[1., "Meters"*"Kilograms"/"Amperes"], "Pounds"]
(* returns 2.20462 lb m/A *)
UnitConvert[Quantity[1., "Meters"*"Feet"*"Kilograms"/"Amperes"], "Centimeters"]
(* returns 3048 kg cm^2/A *)

While this is a convenient shortcut to simplify compound units, it also seems dangerous, since this behaviour is not specified in the documentation.


Also, I am using units in my calculations to ensure I am not making trivial errors in entering formulas or input values. I need Mathematica to throw an error when it encounters such incompatible unit conversions.


Is this a feature (to be specified as such in future versions) or a bug (likely to be fixed in future versions)? And is there perhaps a way to specify a "strict" behaviour for UnitConvert?




Answer



No idea concerning the interesting behaviour you mention about UnitConvert. However here is a simple workaround for you strict conversion problem (using the function CompatibleUnitQ suited for your need !!)


strictUnitConvert[q1_, q2_] := UnitConvert[q1, q2] /; CompatibleUnitQ[q1, q2];
strictUnitConvert[_, _] := "Error !! Not compatible Units";

Test


strictUnitConvert[Quantity[1., 1/"Meters"], "Centimeters"]
strictUnitConvert[Quantity[1., "Amperes"/"Meters"], "Centimeters"]
strictUnitConvert[Quantity[1., "Meters"*"Kilograms"/"Amperes"], "Pounds"]
strictUnitConvert[Quantity[1., "Meters"*"Feet"*"Kilograms"/"Amperes"], "Centimeters"]


all return



Error !! Not compatible Units



whereas for example :


strictUnitConvert[Quantity[1., "Meters"/"Seconds"], "Centimeters"/"Minutes"]

return




Quantity[6000., ("Centimeters")/("Minutes")]



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...
Post a Comment
Read more

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?
Post a Comment
Read more

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...
Post a Comment
Read more