Skip to main content

remote access - Executing local functions remotely


The following


Attributes[remoteExecute] = {HoldAllComplete};

remoteExecute[expr_] :=
Module[{compressed,
ubuntuBox = RemoteConnect[ip, "username", "password"]},
compressed = Compress[Unevaluated[expr]];
ToExpression[
RemoteRunProcess[ubuntuBox,
TemplateApply[
"wolframscript -format InputForm -code 'Uncompress[\"``\"]'",
compressed], "StandardOutput"]]]


is able to execute functions remotely, so long as your function isn't locally defined. So for example if ~/only_on_ubuntu_box is a file that exists only on your remote machine, this function will fail for:





How can one get around this limitation?



Answer



If I understand correctly, you have some functions defined locally that are not defined on the remote machine. When you remote evaluate your expression, which includes these functions, the remote evaluation doesn't work properly. So, you want your remote evaluation function to transfer all of the necessary local functions to the remote machine, and then evaluate your expression.


The good news is that this is exactly what CloudEvaluate does, although the remote machine in this case is the WolframCloud and not your remote machine. However, the machinery created to enable CloudEvaluate to work is already present in Wolfram Language. The function that does the heavy lifting for CloudEvaluate is Language`ExtendedFullDefinition. A very simple version using this function would be:


SetAttributes[compressWithDefinitions, HoldFirst];
compressWithDefinitions[expr_] := With[

{def = Language`ExtendedFullDefinition[expr]},

Compress @ Unevaluated[
Language`ExtendedFullDefinition[] = def;
expr
]
]

The compressed string created by this function first loads all necessary definitions needed to evaluate expr, and then evaluates expr.


I will simulate your remote usage by using LocalSubmit, which sends an evaluation to a separate kernel. Here is a function only defined in the local kernel:



g[x_] := x^2

Here are two compress strings that return the downvalues of g when uncompressed:


str1 = Compress @ Unevaluated[DownValues[g]];
str2 = compressWithDefinitions @ DownValues[g];

Now, if we use LocalSubmit with str1 we find that, as expected, the remote kernel has no downvalues for g:


Clear[dv];
With[{s = str1},
LocalSubmit[

Uncompress[s],
HandlerFunctions-><|"TaskFinished"->((dv=#EvaluationResult)&)|>,
HandlerFunctionsKeys->"EvaluationResult"
]
];
Pause[1];
dv


{}




On the other hand, when using str2, the local kernel does have the transferred downvalues for g:


Clear[dv];
With[{s = str2},
LocalSubmit[
Uncompress[s],
HandlerFunctions-><|"TaskFinished"->((dv=#EvaluationResult)&)|>,
HandlerFunctionsKeys->"EvaluationResult"
]
];

Pause[1];
dv


{HoldPattern[g[x_]] :> x^2}



So, I think you should be able to use compressWithDefinitions to achieve your goals.


Note that there are some additional subtleties that can arise if you try to use package functions, where you need to make sure that the compressed string includes contexts when necessary.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...