Skip to main content

parallelization - Writing data to a common file during parallel processing


I am executing a loop, and in each loop I have to store a parameter in a file. It is like


file = FileNameJoin[{NotebookDirectory[], "info.txt"}];

OpenWrite[file];
Do[out = Prime[i]; WriteString[file, i, "\t", out, "\n"], {i, 1, 10}]
Close[file]

It stores the values perfectly. But when I use Parallelize[], it produce only partial output.


file = FileNameJoin[{NotebookDirectory[], "infop.txt"}];
OpenWrite[file];
Do[out = Prime[i]; WriteString[file, i, "\t", out, "\n"], {i, 1, 10}]
Close[file]


It produces only 4-5 sets out of 10 (They are in random ordering, but that is not a problem). Although when I use Print[], it shows all the sets.


Parallelize[Do[out = Prime[i]; Print[i , "\t", out], {i, 1, 10}]]

The loop I am using for work is pretty big and I may have to check the info.txt file several times to know the status while the code is running. Is there any way to write the data (as the code is running) in a common file while using parallel processing.



Answer



Interaction between parallel kernels


This is a common parallelisation problem. Without proper blocking you'll produce such results, but with blocking you loose all your parallelisation. So you've to come up with a solution with at least interaction between the parallel sub-kernels as possible. The less interaction, the faster things will go.


A solution is to use a shared variable to communicate results found to the master kernel:


file = FileNameJoin[{$TemporaryDirectory, "info.txt"}];
OpenWrite[file];


SetSharedVariable[list]
list = {};
ParallelDo[out = Prime[i]; AppendTo[list, {i, out}], {i, 1, 10}]

list = Sort[list]; (* only if you care about order *)

WriteString[file, #[[1]], "\t", #[[2]], "\n"] & /@ list;

Close[file]


If you want to, you could aggregate this into a function, but then you've to take care about the distributed definition of your function to the parallel kernels. Not if you define your function in the current context, because those are distributed automatically.


Edit:


I do now parallelisation for years (not necessarily in Mma) and suffered a lot to get things real going, but what I learned from my experiences is:



  1. Explore all serial ways to speed things up, before you go parallel

  2. If you go parallel beware of synchronisation, because this is killing parallelism


Edit 2:


This is maybe not the most elegant solution to merge files in a directory, but it does the job. Imagine you have several files with data in it in a flat directory. For instance:




  • /tmp/test/test1.txt -> "Hello"

  • /tmp/test/test2.txt -> "World"


You can read all the files in the directory into a list:


strList = Read /@ OpenRead /@ (SetDirectory["/tmp/test"]; 
FileNameJoin[{"/tmp/test", #}] & /@ FileNames[]);

And now you can OpenWrite and write to that channel mapping over strList and you're done.


This is all, if you don't want to leave your tool (like me; probably emacs affected ;) )



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...