Skip to main content

boxes - Customizing display of partial differential equations


I am manipulating partial differential equations symbolically, and would like to get the easily readable form $\rho \frac{\partial v}{\partial t}$, leaving variables implicit.


Based on suggestions from How to make traditional output for derivatives I started out with


Derivative /: 
MakeBoxes[Derivative[α__][f1_][vars__Symbol], TraditionalForm] :=
Module[{bb, dd, sp},
MakeBoxes[dd, _] ^=

If[Length[{α}] == 1, "\[DifferentialD]", "∂"];
MakeBoxes[sp, _] ^= "\[ThinSpace]";
bb /: MakeBoxes[bb[x__], _] := RowBox[Map[ToBoxes[#] &, {x}]];
TemplateBox[{ToBoxes[bb[dd^Plus[α], f1]],
ToBoxes[Apply[bb,
Riffle[Map[bb[dd, #] &,
Select[({vars}^{α}), (# =!= 1 &)]], sp]]],
ToBoxes[Derivative[α][f1][vars]]}, "ShortFraction",
DisplayFunction :> (FractionBox[#1, #2] &),
InterpretationFunction :> (#3 &),

Tooltip -> Automatic]]

When functions appear outside of partial derivatives, they still appear as $v(t,x)$. Trying to fix this, I tried


supressVariable[f_Symbol] := 
f /: MakeBoxes[f[t, x], TraditionalForm] :=
InterpretationBox[ToBoxes[f], f[t, x]]
SetAttributes[supressVariable, Listable]
supressVariable[{v, ρ, p, f}];

This works fine for both



f[t, x] v[t, x] == 0 // TraditionalForm

and


ρ[t, x]*Derivative[0, 1][v][t, x] + 
v[t, x]*Derivative[0, 1][ρ][t, x] +
Derivative[1, 0][ρ][t, x] == 0 // TraditionalForm

producing nicely readable equations. However, the simple


f[t, x] == 0 // TraditionalForm


gives error message



An unknown box name (ToBoxes) was sent as the BoxForm for the expression. Check the format rules for the expression



and I don't know what to do with this. Can anybody help me out?



Answer



It seems to me that using MakeBoxes in this case is overkill. How about this simpler definition?


supressVariable[f_Symbol] := 
Format[f[t, x], TraditionalForm] := Interpretation[f, f[t, x]]


SetAttributes[supressVariable, Listable]
supressVariable[{v, ρ, p, f}];

This doesn't encounter the issue you faced, because the symbol f is passed directly to Interpretation (no need to wrap it in ToBoxes at all).


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.