Skip to main content

output formatting - How to get this grid normal height?


When I execute this


Grid[{{x, x}, {SpanFromAbove, x}, {SpanFromAbove, x}}, 

ItemSize -> {{Automatic},
{Automatic, {1 -> Scaled[0.2], 2 -> Scaled[0.4], 3 -> Scaled[0.4]}}},
Frame -> All,
Alignment -> {Center, Center}, Spacings -> {{2}, {1}}]

I get an extremely tall grid instead of a normal height grid. Is this a bug or am I doing something wrong? Version 10.0.1 Win8.1 64bit



This just keeps getting worse. I am have used a Pane as some have suggested that the grid needs a sized container for it to work with Scaled. I get back a truncated grid. This is really baffling. Any ideas how to get this to work.


Pane[
Grid[{{x, x}, {SpanFromAbove, x}, {SpanFromAbove, x}},

ItemSize -> {{{Scaled[0.5]}},
{Automatic, {1 -> Scaled[0.2], 2 -> Scaled[0.4], 3 -> Scaled[0.4]}}},
Frame -> All, Alignment -> {Center, Center}, Spacings -> {{1}, {1}}],
ImageSize -> {432, 216}]

Mathematica graphics


It gives a cut off grid. ??? I can just make out the top of the "x" in the first column. It shouldn't be this difficult to have a grid a prescribed size and scale some rows within it. I must be doing something wrong.



Answer



My advice, unless it is really basic problem, do not use SpanFrom~. Usually you will face "issues" like that. Next time try with nested Grids.


Like I've said, the whole layout management is broken and everyone who tried do something more complex than simple grid with automatic options will agree.



This is just another example, your case works if vertical heights sum up to: .5...


Framed[
Grid[{
{x, x},
{SpanFromAbove, x},
{SpanFromAbove, x}},
ItemSize -> {
{{Scaled@.499}}, (*specX*)
{Scaled@.1, Scaled@.2, Scaled@.2} (*specY*)
}, Frame -> All, Alignment -> {Center, Center}, Spacings -> {0, 0}]

,
ImageSize -> {432, 216}, FrameMargins -> 0, Alignment -> {Left, Top}]


enter image description here



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

calculus and analysis - Integral of the Sinc product

Let us consider the following integral $$ B_n = \int_0^\infty \prod_{k=1,3,5,\dots}^n\frac{\sin (x/k)}{x/k}dx $$ By definition, Sinc[x] == Sin[x]/x , therefore B[n_?OddQ] := Integrate[Product[Sinc[x/k], {k, 1, n, 2}], {x, 0, Infinity}] B /@ Range[1, 13, 2] {Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2} OK, everything is fine. But... B[15] 467807924713440738696537864469 Pi/935615849440640907310521750000 What's going on? Answer As Eckhard wrote in comments B[n] is the n-th Borwein integral . (The letter B was not accidental :) ) This funny properties of Borwein integrals is related to the Fourier transform of Sinc function FourierTransform[Sinc[x], x, k] 1/2 Sqrt[Pi/2] (Sign[1 - k] + Sign[1 + k]) Plot[%, {k, -2, 2}, Filling -> 0] which is the box function. The result is $\pi/2$ while the sum $$ 1/3+1/5+\dots+1/n $$ B_n = \frac{\pi}{2} - \pi \bigg(\sum_{k=3,5,\ldots}^n\frac{1}{k} -1\biggr)^\frac{n-1}{2}\prod_{k=3,5,\dots}^n\frac{k}{k-1}. $$ For $n=15$ it is equal to $$ \frac{46780...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...